New Evidence that AV Node Slow Pathway Conduction Directly Influences Fast Pathway Function
J. CHRISTOPH GELLER M.D.
Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Cardiac Bioelectricity Research and Training Center, Case Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorLEE A. BIBLO M.D.
Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Cardiac Bioelectricity Research and Training Center, Case Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
MARK D. CARLSON M.D.
Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Cardiac Bioelectricity Research and Training Center, Case Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, Ohio
Mark D. Carlson, M.D., Division of Cardiology, University Hospital 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106. Fax: 216-844-8216.Search for more papers by this authorJ. CHRISTOPH GELLER M.D.
Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Cardiac Bioelectricity Research and Training Center, Case Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorLEE A. BIBLO M.D.
Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Cardiac Bioelectricity Research and Training Center, Case Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, Ohio
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
MARK D. CARLSON M.D.
Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Cardiac Bioelectricity Research and Training Center, Case Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, Ohio
Mark D. Carlson, M.D., Division of Cardiology, University Hospital 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106. Fax: 216-844-8216.Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Interaction Between the Slow and Fast Pathway. Introduction: Shortening of the AV node fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) following successful slow pathway ablation may be a nonspecific effect of energy application at the AV junction or may be due to elimination of a direct effect of slow pathway conduction on the fast pathway.
Methods and Results: Twenty-six consecutive patients (20 women and 6 men; mean age 45 ± 3 years) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia who underwent successful slow pathway ablation (defined as complete elimination of dual AV node physiology) were studied. The fast pathway ERP (at a drive train cycle length of 600 msec) was determined prior to ablation (baseline) and following unsuccessful and successful ablation attempts. Successful slow pathway ablation shortened the fast pathway ERP significantly (317 ± 9 msec; P < 0.001) compared to baseline (386 ± 12 msec), whereas unsuccessful ablations bad no effect (376 ± 11 msec). Sinus cycle length, the AH interval, and blood pressure were unchanged following successful ablation. Shortening of the fast pathway ERP did not correlate with the number of energy applications or with two measures of the proximity between the slow and the fast pathway.
Conclusion: These results support the hypothesis that shortening of the fast pathway ERP following slow pathway ablation is due to elimination of a direct effect of slow pathway conduction on fast pathway function rather than a nonspecific effect of repeated energy delivery at the AV junction.
References
- 1 Kay GN, Epstein AD, Dailey SM, et al: Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit. Circulation 1992; 85: 1675–1688.
- 2 Lindsay BD, Chung MK, Gamache MC, et al: Therapeutic end points for the treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia by catheter-guided radiofrequency current. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 733–740.
- 3 Natale A, Wathen M, Wolfe K, et al: Comparative atrioventricular node properties after radiofrequency ablation and operative therapy of atrioventricular node reentry. PACE 1993; 16: 971–977.
- 4 Natale A, Klein G, Yee R: Shortening of fast pathway refractoriness after slow pathway ablation. Effects of autonomic blockade. Circulation 1994; 89: 1103–1108.
- 5 Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, et al: Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow pathway conduction. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 313–318.
- 6 Li HG, Klein GJ, Stites HW, et al: Elimination of slow pathway conduction: An accurate indicator of clinical success after radiofrequency atrioventricular node modification. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1849–1853.
- 7 Ross DL, Johnson DC, Denniss AR, et al: Curative surgery for atrioventricular junctional (“AV nodal”) reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6: 1383–1392.
- 8 Lo HM, Lin FY, Tseng CD, et al: Selective surgical ablation of the slow atrioventricular nodal pathway by posterior perinodal dissection. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 1457–1459.
- 9 Moulton K, Miller B, Scott J, et al: Radiofrequency catheter ablation for AV nodal reentry: A technique for rapid transection of the slow AV nodal pathway. PACE 1993; 16: 760–768.
- 10 Wathan M, Natale A, Wolfe K, et al: An anatomically guided approach to atrioventricular node slow pathway ablation. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 886–889.
- 11 Jazayeri MR, Hempe SL, Sra JS, et al: Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation 1992; 85: 1318–1328.
- 12 Haissaguerre M, Gaita F, Fischer B, et al: Elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using discrete slow pathway potentials to guide application of radiofrequency energy. Circulation 1992; 85: 2162–2175.
- 13 Wu D, Yeh SJ, Wang CC, et al: Nature of dual atrioventricular node pathways and the tachycardia circuit as defined by radiofrequency technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 884–895.
- 14 Wu D, Yeh SJ, Wang CC, et al: A simple technique for selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 1612–1621.
- 15
Takahashi A,
Iesaka Y,
Igawa M, et al: Atrioventricular nodal physiology after slow pathway ablation.
PACE
1994; 7: 2137–2142.
10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb03815.x Google Scholar
- 16 Jazayeri MR, Akhtar M: Electrophysiologic behavior of atrioventricular node after selective fast or slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. PACE 1993; 16: 623–628.
- 17 Mitrani RD, Klein LS, Hackett FK, et al: Radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia: Comparison between fast (anterior) and slow (posterior) pathway ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 432–441.
- 18 Shen WK, Munger TM, Stanton MS, et al: Effects of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 8: 627–638.
- 19
Geller JC,
Biblo LA,
Carlson MD: Atrioventricular node “slow pathway” conduction time is due to the length of the pathway. (Abstract) J Am Coll Cardiol
1995; 25: 359A.
10.1016/0735-1097(95)92948-5 Google Scholar
- 20 Goldreyer BN, Bigger JT: Spontaneous and induced re-entrant tachycardia. Ann Intern Med 1969; 70: 87–98.
- 21 Bigger JT, Goldreyer BN: The mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1970; 42: 673–688.
- 22 Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra RC, et al: Demonstration of dual A-V nodal pathway in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1973; 48: 549–555.
- 23 Rosen KM, Mehta A, Miller RA: Demonstration of dual atrioventricular nodal pathways in man. Am J Cardiol 1974; 33: 291–294.
- 24 Ueng KC, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al: Dimension and related anatomical distance of Koch's triangle in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 7: 1017–1023.
- 25 Bonke F, Allessie MA, Kirchhof C, et al: Investigation of the conduction properties of the sinus node. In DP Zipes, J Jalife, eds: Cardiac Arrhythmias. Grune & Stratton, New York , 1985, pp. 73–79.
- 26 Nath S, Lynch C, Whayne JG, et al: Cellular electrophysiological effects of hyperthermia on isolated guinea pig papillary muscle. Implications for catheter ablation. Circulation 1993; 88: 1826–1831.
- 27 Weidmann S: Effect of current flow on the membrane potential of cardiac muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 1951; 115: 227–236.
- 28 Cranefield PF, Hoffman BF: Propagated repolarization in heart muscle. J Gen Physiol 1958; 41: 633–649.
- 29 Antzelevitch C: Electrotonus and reflection. In MR Rosen, MJ Janse, AL Wit, eds: Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Textbook. Futura Publishing Company Inc., Mount Kisco , 1990, pp. 491–516.
- 30 Strickberger SA, Daoud E, Niebauer M, et al: Effects of partial and complete ablation: of the slow pathway on fast pathway properties in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1994; 5: 645–649.
- 31 Strickberger SA, Weiss R, Daoud EG, et al: Ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation before and after slow pathway ablation. Effects of autonomic blockade and adrenergic stimulation. Circulation 1996; 94: 1023–1026.
- 32 Lesh MD, Gibb WJ, Epstein LM: Electrotonic interaction between dual AV nodal pathways: Evidence from RF ablation and a computer model. (Abstract) Circulation 1992; 86(Suppl I): I–130.
- 33 Spach MS, Miller WT, Geselowitz DB, et al: The discontinuous nature of propagation in normal canine cardiac muscle. Evidence for recurrent discontinuities of intracellular resistance that affect the membrane currents. Circ Res 1981; 48: 39–54.
- 34 Rohr S, Salzberg BM: Characterization of impulse propagation at the microscopic level across geometrically defined expansions of excitable tissue: Multiple site optical recording of transmembrane voltage (MSORTV) in patterned growth heart cell cultures. J Gen Physiol 1994; 104: 287–309.
- 35 Quan W, Rudy Y: Unidirectional block and reentry of cardiac excitation: A model study. Circ Res 1990; 66: 367–382.
- 36 Biehl M, Keelan ET, Underwood RD, et al: Temporal changes in atrioventricular nodal refractoriness post slow pathway ablation. Circulation 1995; 92(Suppl I): 1–213.
- 37 Krahn A, Klein G, Sheahan R, et al: Time-dependent effects of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway refractoriness in AV node reentry. Circulation 1995; 92(Suppl I): I–14.
Citing Literature
