Volume 29, Issue 2 pp. 117-123

Sheathless Implantation of Permanent Coronary Sinus-LV Pacing Leads

PETER HOFFMEISTER

PETER HOFFMEISTER

Cardiac Pacing, Electrophysiology, and Arrhythmia Section, Caritas Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
G. MUQTADA CHAUDHRY

G. MUQTADA CHAUDHRY

Cardiac Pacing, Electrophysiology, and Arrhythmia Section, Caritas Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
MICHAEL V. ORLOV

MICHAEL V. ORLOV

Cardiac Pacing, Electrophysiology, and Arrhythmia Section, Caritas Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
GUNJAN SHUKLA

GUNJAN SHUKLA

Cardiac Pacing, Electrophysiology, and Arrhythmia Section, Caritas Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
CHARLES I. HAFFAJEE

CHARLES I. HAFFAJEE

Cardiac Pacing, Electrophysiology, and Arrhythmia Section, Caritas Saint Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 February 2006
Citations: 2
Address for reprints: Charles Haffajee, M.D., Cardiac Pacing, Electrophysiology, and Arrhythmia Section, 736 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02135-2997, USA. Fax: (617) 789-5029; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background: Implantation of CS-LV pacing leads is usually accomplished through specialized sheaths with additional use of contrast venography and other steps. Direct implantation at a target pacing site could provide a simplified procedure with appropriate leads.

Methods: A progressive CS-LV lead implant protocol was used, with initial attempts made to place the lead directly using only fluoroscopy and lead stylet or wire manipulation. Coronary sinus (CS) sheaths were only used later if direct lead placement failed.

Results: There were 105 attempted implants with 96% (101/105) success. Leads were implanted sheathlessly in 69% (70/101) cases. Pacing parameters and final lead position did not differ significantly between implants that did or did not require sheaths for implants. Three peri-procedural complications occurred in implants where sheaths were used. In 33% (33/101) of implants, the leads were placed without the use of sheaths or contrast venography in 20 minutes or less.

Conclusions: Direct placement of the CS-LV pacing lead without sheaths can be accomplished successfully in a majority of implants and in ≤20 minutes in a third, without inferior pacing parameters. This may provide for shorter or less technically difficult or expensive procedures with low risk.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.