Acute and Long-Term Results of Slow Pathway Ablation in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia—An Analysis of the Predictive Factors for Arrhythmia Recurrence
HEIDI LUISE ESTNER
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorGJIN NDREPEPA
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorJUN DONG
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorISABEL DEISENHOFER
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorJUERGEN SCHREIECK
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMICHAEL SCHNEIDER
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorANDREAS PLEWAN
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMARTIN KARCH
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorSONJA WEYERBROCK
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorDIANA WADE
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorBERNHARD ZRENNER
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCLAUS SCHMITT
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHEIDI LUISE ESTNER
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorGJIN NDREPEPA
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorJUN DONG
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorISABEL DEISENHOFER
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorJUERGEN SCHREIECK
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMICHAEL SCHNEIDER
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorANDREAS PLEWAN
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorMARTIN KARCH
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorSONJA WEYERBROCK
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorDIANA WADE
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorBERNHARD ZRENNER
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCLAUS SCHMITT
Deutsches Herzzentrum München and 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Backqround: Predictors of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) recurrence after radiofrequency ablation including the importance of residual slow pathway conduction are not known. The aim of this study was to report the acute and long-term results of slow pathway ablation in a large series of consecutive patients with AVNRT and to analyze the potential predictors of arrhythmia recurrence with a particular emphasis on the residual slow pathway conduction after ablation.
Methods: The study included 506 consecutive patients with AVNRT (mean age 52.6 ± 16 years, 315 women) who underwent slow pathway ablation using a combined electrophysiological and anatomical approach. The end point of ablation procedure was noninducibility of the arrhythmia. The primary end point of the study was the recurrence of AVNRT.
Results: Acute success was achieved in 500 patients (98.8%). After ablation, 471 patients (93%) were followed up for a mean of 903 ± 692 days. Of the 465 patients with successful ablation, 24 patients (5.2%) developed AVNRT recurrences during the follow-up. No significant differences in the cumulative rates of AVNRT recurrence were observed in groups with or without electrophysiological evidence of residual slow pathway conduction (P = 0.25, log-rank test). Multivariate analysis identified only age as an independent predictor of AVNRT recurrence (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.94–0.99, P = 0.004) with younger patients being at an increased risk for arrhythmia recurrence.
Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that only younger age, but not other clinical or electrophysiological parameters including residual slow pathway conduction predicted an increased risk for AVNRT recurrence after slow pathway radiofrequency ablation.
References
- 1 Jackman WM, Nakagawa H, Heidbüchel H, et al. Three forms of atrioventricular nodal (junctional) re-entrant tachycardia: Differential diagnosis, electrophysiological characteristics, and implications for anatomy of the re-entrant circuit. In: DP Zipes, J Jalife (eds.): Cardiac Electrophysiology. From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia , PA , W.B. Saunders, 1995, pp. 620–637.
- 2 Haissaguerre M, Gaita F, Fischer B, et al. Elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using discrete slow potentials to guide application of radiofrequency energy. Circulation 1992; 85: 2162–2175.
- 3 Kottkamp H, Hindricks G, Willems S, et al. An anatomically and electrogram-guided stepwise approach for effective and safe catheter ablation of the fast pathway for elimination of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 974–981.DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00509-O
- 4 Jazayeri MR, Hempe SL, Sra JS, et al. Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation 1992; 85: 1318–1328.
- 5
Baker P,
Wilson F,
Johnston F.
The mechanism of auricular paroxysmal tachycardia.
Am Heart J
1943; 26: 435–445.
10.1016/S0002-8703(43)90147-4 Google Scholar
- 6 Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra RC, et al. Demonstration of dual A-V nodal pathways in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation 1973; 48: 549–555.
- 7 Mendez C, Moe GK. Demonstration of a dual A-V nodal conduction system in the isolated rabbit heart. Circ Res 1966; 19: 378–393.
- 8 Kay GN, Epstein AE, Dailey SM, et al. Selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Evidence for involvement of perinodal myocardium within the reentrant circuit. Circulation 1992; 85: 1675–1688.
- 9 Wu D, Yeh SJ, Wang CC, et al. Nature of dual atrioventricular node pathways and the tachycardia circuit as defined by radiofrequency ablation technique. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 884–895.
- 10 Lee MA, Morady F, Kadish A, et al. Catheter modification of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy for control of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Circulation 1991; 83: 827–835.
- 11 Mitrani RD, Klein LS, Hackett FK, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia: Comparison between fast (anterior) and slow (posterior) pathway ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 432–441.
- 12 Li HG, Klein GJ, Stites HW, et al. Elimination of slow pathway conduction: An accurate indicator of clinical success after radiofrequency atrioventricular node modification. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1849–1853.
- 13 Manolis AS, Wang PJ, Estes NA 3rd. Radiofrequency ablation of slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Do arrhythmia recurrences correlate with persistent slow pathway conduction or site of successful ablation? Circulation 1994; 90: 2815–2819.
- 14 Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, et al. Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry, by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 313–318.
- 15 Clague JR, Dagres N, Kottkamp H, et al. Targeting the slow pathway for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: Initial results and long-term follow-up in 379 consecutive patients. Eur Heart J 2001; 22: 82–88.
- 16 Baker JH 2nd, Plumb VJ, Epstein AE, et al. Predictors of recurrent atrioventricular nodal reentry after selective slow pathway ablation. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 765–769.
- 17 Lindsay BD, Chung MK, Gamache MC, et al. Therapeutic end points for the treatment of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia by catheter-guided radiofrequency current. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 733–740.
- 18 Wang CC, Yeh SJ, Wen MS, et al. Late clinical and electrophysiologic outcome of radiofrequency ablation therapy by the inferior approach in atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 219–226.DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90471-5
- 19 Schwacke H, Brandt A, Rameken M, et al. Long-term outcome of AV node modulation in 387 consecutive patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Z Kardiol 2002; 91: 389–395.DOI: 10.1007/s00392-002-0792-4
- 20 Weismuller P, Kuly S, Brandts B, et al. Is electrical stimulation during administration of catecholamines required for the evaluation of success after ablation of atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardias? J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 689–694.DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01798-3
- 21 Chen SA, Wu TJ, Chiang CE, et al. Recurrent tachycardia after selective ablation of slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 131–137.
- 22 Calkins H, Prystowsky E, Berger RD, et al. Recurrence of conduction following radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures: Relationship to ablation target and electrode temperature. The Atakr Multicenter Investigators Group. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 7: 704–712.
- 23 Engelstein ED, Stein KM, Markowitz SM, et al. Posterior fast atrioventricular node pathways: Implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1098–1105.DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00609-5
- 24 Kalbfleisch SJ, Strickberger SA, Williamson B, et al. Randomized comparison of anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches to ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 716–723.
- 25 Tai CT, Chen SA, Chiang CE, et al. Multiple anterograde atrioventricular node pathways in patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 725–731.DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00217-3
- 26 Hsieh MH, Chen SA, Tai CT, et al. Absence of junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation 1998; 98: 2296–2300.
- 27 McGuire MA, Robotin M, Yip AS, et al. Electrophysiologic and histologic effects of dissection of the connections between the atrium and posterior part of the atrioventricular node. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 693–701.
- 28 Sheahan RG, Klein GJ, Yee R, et al. Atrioventricular node reentry with ‘smooth’ AV node function curves: A different arrhythmia substrate? Circulation 1996; 93: 969–972.
- 29 Hariman RJ, Gomes JA, El-Sherif N. Catecholamine-dependent trioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation 1983; 67: 681–686.
- 30 Wu D, Denes P, Dhingra R, et al. Determinants of fast- and slow-pathway conduction in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. Circ Res 1975; 36: 782–790.
- 31 Haines DE. The biophysics and pathophysiology of lesion formation during radiofrequency ablation. In: DP Zipes, J Jalife (eds.): Cardiac Electrophysiology. From Cell to Bedside, 2nd Ed. Philadelphia , PA , W.B. Saunders, 1995, pp. 1442–1452.
- 32 Langberg JJ, Leon A, Borganelli M, et al. A randomized, prospective comparison of anterior and posterior approaches to radiofrequency catheter ablation of trioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Circulation 1993; 87: 1551–1556.
- 33 Hummel JD, Strickberger SA, Williamson BD, et al. Effect of residual slow pathway function on the time course of recurrences of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia after radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 628–630.DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80634-1
- 34 Van Hare GF, Chiesa NA, Campbell RM, et al. For the pediatric electrophysiology society. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: Effect of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2002; 13: 203–209.DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00203.x
- 35 Blaufox AD, Rhodes JF, Fishberger SB. Age related changes in dual AV nodal physiology. PACE 2000; 23(4 Pt 1): 477–480.
- 36 Waki K, Kim JS, Becker AE. Morphology of the human atrioventricular node is age dependent: A feature of potential clinical significance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2000; 11: 1144–1151.
- 37 Umetani K, Singer DH, McCraty R, et al. Twenty-four hour time domain heart rate variability and heart rate: Relations to age and gender over nine decades. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 593–601.DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00554-8
- 38 Bonnemeier H, Richardt G, Potratz J, et al. Circadian profile of cardiac autonomic nervous modulation in healthy subjects: Differing effects of aging and gender on heart rate variability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003; 14: 791–799.
- 39 Salata JJ, Gill RM, Gilmour RF Jr, et al. Effects of sympathetic tone on vagally induced phasic changes in heart rate and atrioventricular node conduction in the anesthetized dog. Circ Res 1986; 58: 584–594.
- 40 Hatzinikolaou H, Rodriguez LM, Smeets JL, et al. Isoprenaline and inducibility of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia. Heart 1998; 79: 165–168.
- 41 Mann DE, Kelly PA, Adler SW, et al. Palpitations occur frequently following radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia, but do not predict pathway recurrence. PACE 1993; 16: 1645–1649.
- 42 Grossman DS, Cohen TJ, Goldner B, et al. Pseudorecurrence of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 516–519.DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90625-4