Volume 28, Issue s1 pp. S19-S23

Influence of Different Atrioventricular and Interventricular Delays on Cardiac Output During Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

LUCIE RIEDLBAUCHOVÁ

LUCIE RIEDLBAUCHOVÁ

Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
JOSEF KAUTZNER

JOSEF KAUTZNER

Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
PETR FRÍDL

PETR FRÍDL

Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 January 2005
Citations: 33
Address for reprints: Josef Kautzner, M.D., Ph.D., F.E.S.C., Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Vídeňská 1958/9, 140 21 Praha 4, Czech Republic. Fax: +420 24172 8225; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Restoration of the atrioventricular (AVD) and interventricular (VVD) delays increases the hemodynamic benefit conferred by biventricular (BiV) stimulation. This study compared the effects of different AVD and VVD on cardiac output (CO) during three stimulation modes: BiV-LV = left ventricle (LV) preceding right ventricle (RV) by 4 ms; BiV-RV = RV preceding LV by 4 ms; LVP = single-site LV pacing. We studied 19 patients with chronic heart failure due to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, QRS ≥ 150 ms, mean LV end-diastolic diameter = 78 ± 7 mm, and mean LV ejection fraction = 21 ± 3%. CO was estimated by Doppler echocardiographic velocity time integral formula with sample volume placed in the LV outflow tract. Sets of sensed-AVDs (S-AVD) 90–160 ms, paced-AVDs (P-AVD) 120–160 ms, and VVDs 4–20 ms were used. BiV-RV resulted in lower CO than BiV-LV. S-AVD 120 ms and P-AVD 140 ms caused the most significant increase in CO for all three pacing modes. LVP produced a similar increase in CO as BiV stimulation; however, AV sequential pacing was associated with a nonsignificantly higher CO during LVP than with BiV stimulation. CO during BiV stimulation was the highest when LV preceded RV, and VVD ranged between 4 and 12 ms. The most negative effect on CO was observed when RV preceded LV by 4 ms. Hemodynamic improvement during BiV stimulation was dependent both on optimized AVD and VVD. LV preceding RV by 4–12 ms was the most optimal. Advancement of the RV was not beneficial in the majority of patients.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.