Volume 14, Issue 1 pp. 7-12
Full Access

Safety of External Cardioversion/Defibrillation in Patients with Internal Defibrillation Patches and No Device

SERGIO L. PINSKI

SERGIO L. PINSKI

Section of Electrophysiology and Pacemakers, Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
ANITA Z. ARNOLD

ANITA Z. ARNOLD

Section of Electrophysiology and Pacemakers, Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
MATTHEW MICK

MATTHEW MICK

Section of Electrophysiology and Pacemakers, Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
JAMES D. MALONEY

JAMES D. MALONEY

Section of Electrophysiology and Pacemakers, Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Search for more papers by this author
RICHARD G. TROHMAN

Corresponding Author

RICHARD G. TROHMAN

Section of Electrophysiology and Pacemakers, Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

Address for reprints: Richard G. Trohman, M.D., Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, One Clinic Center, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. Fax: (216) 444-0456.Search for more papers by this author
First published: January 1991
Citations: 16

Abstract

Placement of prophylactic epicardial defibrillation patches at time of open-heart surgery in patients at risk for postoperative arrhythmias has been strongly questioned. Concern has centered on the ability to safely perform subsequent external defibrillation if needed. From 61 patients who were treated with a two-stage strategy we identified 17 who, while wearing epicardial patches and no generator, received external cardioversion/defibrillation for 20 episodes of hemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmias. All the patients had one small and one large patch. Eighteen of the episodes were induced during electrophysiological testing (with transthoracic shocks delivered via pad electrodes oriented in an apex-posterior configuration) and two were spontaneous. The episodes occurred at 21 ± 27 days from patch implant. Thirteen episodes (65%) were converted with one shock at an energy level of 185 ± 65 J. Seven (35%) required a second shock at 351 ± 22 J. The accumulated energy requirement was 286 ± 205 J. No adverse outcomes were noted. The number of episodes requiring more than one shock and the energy requirements were not different from those in a control group of 20 similar arrhythmias treated with the same equipment. Under these conditions, external cardioversion/ defibrillation in patients with one large and one small epicardial defibrillation patch was uniformly successful. Further data is needed in the out-of-hospital setting and on the results of external defibrillation in patients with two large patches.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.