Understanding Consumer Confidence in the Safety of Food: Its Two-Dimensional Structure and Determinants
Corresponding Author
Janneke De Jonge
*Address correspondence to Janneke de Jonge, Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands; tel: +31 317 486124; fax: +31 317 484361; [email protected].Search for more papers by this authorHans Van Trijp
Search for more papers by this authorReint Jan Renes
Search for more papers by this authorLynn Frewer
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Janneke De Jonge
*Address correspondence to Janneke de Jonge, Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands; tel: +31 317 486124; fax: +31 317 484361; [email protected].Search for more papers by this authorHans Van Trijp
Search for more papers by this authorReint Jan Renes
Search for more papers by this authorLynn Frewer
Search for more papers by this authorThe random error variance can be calculated by the formula: Var(Xrandom) = Var(Xobserved) − reliability * Var(Xobserved).
Abstract
Understanding of the determinants of consumer confidence in the safety of food is important if effective risk management and communication are to be developed. In the research reported here, we attempt to understand the roles of consumer trust in actors in the food chain and regulators, consumer recall of food safety incidents, consumer perceptions regarding the safety of particular product groups, personality characteristics, and sociodemographics, as potential determinants of consumer confidence in the safety of food. Consumer confidence in the safety of food was conceptualized as consisting of two distinct dimensions, namely, “optimism” and “pessimism.” On the basis of a representative sample of 657 Dutch consumers, structural equation modeling was applied to simultaneously estimate the effect of the determinants on both “optimism” and “pessimism.” The results indicated that, to a considerable extent, both optimism and pessimism about the safety of food arise from consumer trust in regulators and actors in the food chain and the perceived safety of meat and fish rather than other product categories. In addition, support was found for the notion that optimism and pessimism are conceptually distinct, as these dimensions of confidence were partly influenced by different determinants. The results of this study imply that consumer confidence in the safety of food could be enhanced by improving both consumer trust in societal actors, and consumer safety perceptions of particular product groups.
REFERENCES
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
- Barnett, J., & Breakwell, G. M. (2001). Risk perception and experience: Hazard personality profiles and individual differences. Risk Analysis, 21, 171–177.
- Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., & Kunreuther, H. (2000). Determinants of priority for risk reduction: The role of worry. Risk Analysis, 20, 413–427.
-
Baumgartner, H., &
Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review.
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 139–161.
10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0 Google Scholar
- Berg, L. (2004). Trust in food in the age of mad cow disease: A comparative study of consumers' evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain and Norway. Appetite, 42, 21–32.
- Berg, L., Kjaernes, U., Ganskau, E., Minina, V., Voltchkova, L., Halkier, B., & Holm, L. (2005). Trust in food safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway. European Societies, 7, 103–129.
- Bouyer, M., Bagdassarian, S., Chaabanne, S., & Mullet, E. (2001). Personality correlates of risk perception. Risk Analysis, 21, 457–465.
-
Bredahl, L. (2001). Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods—Results of a cross-national survey.
Journal of Consumer Policy, 24, 23–61.
10.1023/A:1010950406128 Google Scholar
- Buzby, J. C. (2001). Effects of food safety perceptions on food demand and global trade. In A. Regmi (Ed.), Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade (pp. 55–66). Washington , DC : U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Economic Research Service.
- Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2005). Statistisch Jaarboek 2005. Voorburg , The Netherlands .
- Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.
- Cvetkovich, G., Siegrist, M., Murray, R., & Tragesser, S. (2002). New information and social trust: Asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers. Risk Analysis, 22, 359–367.
-
De Jonge, J.,
Frewer, L.,
Van Trijp, H.,
Renes, R. J.,
De Wit, W., &
Timmers, J. (2004). Monitoring consumer confidence in food safety: An exploratory study.
British Food Journal, 106, 837–849.
10.1108/00070700410561423 Google Scholar
- De Jonge, J., Van Trijp, H. C. M., Van der Lans, I. A., Renes, R.-J., & Frewer, L. J. (submitted). How trust in institutions and organisations builds general consumer confidence in the safety of food.
- Dosman, D. M., Adamowicz, W. L., & Hrudey, S. E. (2001). Socioeconomic determinants of health- and food safety-related risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 21, 307–317.
- Fife-Schaw, C., & Rowe, G. (1996). Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: A psychometric study. Risk Analysis, 16, 487–500.
- Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127–152.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
-
Frewer, L. J. (2001). Environmental risk, public trust and perceived exclusion from risk management.
Environmental Risks: Perception, Evaluation and Management, 9, 221–248.
10.1016/S0196-1152(01)80030-2 Google Scholar
- Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1996). What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Analysis, 16, 473–485.
- Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., & Marsh, R. (2002). The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis, 22, 701–711.
- Frewer, L. J., Shepherd, R., & Sparks, P. (1994). The interrelationship between perceived knowledge, control and risk associated with a range of food-related hazards targeted at the individual, other people and society. Journal of Food Safety, 14, 19–39.
- Gebhardt, W. A., & Brosschot, J. F. (2002). Desirability of control: Psychometric properties and relationships with locus of control, personality, coping, and mental and somatic complaints in three Dutch samples. European Journal of Personality, 16, 423–438.
- Green, J. M., Draper, A. K., & Dowler, E. A. (2003). Short cuts to safety: Risk and “rules of thumb” in accounts of food choice. Health, Risk and Society, 5, 33–52.
- Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., Dunwoody, S., & Giese, J. (2004). Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychology, 6, 23–61.
- Grunert, K. G. (2002). Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 13, 275–285.
- Halkier, B., & Holm, L. (2006). Shifting responsibilities for food safety in Europe: An introduction. Appetite, 47, 127–133.
- Hansen, J., Holm, L., Frewer, L., Robinson, P., & Sandøe, P. (2003). Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite, 41, 111–121.
- Henson, S., & Northen, J. (2000). Consumer assessment of the safety of beef at the point of purchase: A pan-European study. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51, 90–105.
-
Johnson, B. B. (1999). Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust.
Journal of Risk Research, 2, 325–354.
10.1080/136698799376763 Google Scholar
- Kirk, S. F. L., Greenwood, D., Cade, J. E., & Pearman, A. D. (2002). Public perception of a range of potential food risks in the United Kingdom. Appetite, 38, 189–197.
- Lang, J. T., & Hallman, W. K. (2005). Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Risk Analysis, 25, 1241–1252.
- Laros, F. J. M., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2004). Importance of fear in the case of genetically modified food. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 889–908.
- Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458.
- Liu, S., Huang, J.-C., & Brown, G. L. (1998). Information and risk perception: A dynamic adjustment process. Risk Analysis, 18, 689–699.
- Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.
- MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.
- McCarthy, M., & Henson, S. (2005). Perceived risk and risk reduction strategies in the choice of beef by Irish consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 16, 435–445.
- Metlay, D. (1999). Institutional trust and confidence: A journey into a conceptual quagmire. In G. Cvetkovich & R. E. Löfstedt (Eds.), Social Trust and the Management of Risk (pp. 100–116). London : Earthscan.
- Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzger, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 487–495.
-
Miles, S.,
Brennan, M.,
Kuznesof, S.,
Ness, M.,
Ritson, C., &
Frewer, L. J. (2004). Public worry about specific food safety issues.
British Food Journal, 106, 9–22.
10.1108/00070700410515172 Google Scholar
- Miles, S., & Frewer, L. J. (2001). Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 47–61.
-
Mitchell, V.-W. (1998). A role for consumer risk perceptions in grocery retailing.
British Food Journal, 100, 171–183.
10.1108/00070709810207856 Google Scholar
-
Mitchell, V.-W., &
Boustani, P. (1994). A preliminary investigation into pre- and post-purchase risk perception and reduction.
European Journal of Marketing, 28, 56–71.
10.1108/03090569410049181 Google Scholar
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. (2006). Our Food, Our Health. Healthy Diet and Safe Food in the Netherlands (No. 270555009). Bilthoven , The Netherlands .
- O'Rourke, R. (2001). European Food Law, 2nd ed. Bembridge : Palladian Law Publishing Ltd.
- Pennings, J. M. E., Wansink, B., & Meulenberg, M. T. G. (2002). A note on modeling consumer reactions to a crisis: The case of the mad cow disease. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 91–100.
- Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17, 43–54.
- Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23(5), 961–972.
- Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2004). Trust, the asymmetry principle, and the role of prior beliefs. Risk Analysis, 24, 1475–1486.
- Poppe, C., & Kjærnes, U. (2003). Trust in Food in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Oslo : National Institute for Consumer Research.
- Saba, A., & Messina, F. (2003). Attitudes towards organic foods and risk/benefit perception associated with pesticides. Food Quality and Preference, 14, 637–645.
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
- Setbon, M., Raude, J., Fischler, C., & Flahault, A. (2005). Risk perception of the “mad cow disease” in France: Determinants and consequences. Risk Analysis, 25, 813–826.
- Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20, 195–203.
- Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20, 713–719.
- Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2001). Better negative than positive? Evidence of a bias for negative information about possible health dangers. Risk Analysis, 21, 199–206.
- Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 353–361.
- Siegrist, M., Earle, T. C., & Gutscher, H. (2003). Test of a trust and confidence model in the applied context of electromagnetic field (EMF) risks. Risk Analysis, 23, 705–716.
- Sijtsma, K., & Van Der Ark, L. A. (2003). Investigation and treatment of missing item scores in test and questionnaire data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 505–528.
- Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13, 675–682.
- Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311–322.
- Sparks, P., & Shepherd, R. (1994). Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: An experimental study. Risk Analysis, 14, 799–806.
- Van Kleef, E., Frewer, L. J., Chryssochoidis, G., Houghton, J. R., Korzen-Bohr, S., Krystallis, T., Lassen, J., Pfenning, U., & Rowe, G. (2006). Perceptions of food risk management among key stakeholders: Results from a cross-European study. Appetite, 47, 46–63.
- Van Rijswijk, W., Cornelisse-Vermaat, J., & Frewer, L. (2006). Can traceability improve consumers' confidence in food quality and safety? The importance of matching information with consumer needs. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Management in AgriFood Chains and Networks, Ede , The Netherlands .
- Verbeke, W. (2001). Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat revisited after the Belgian dioxin crisis. Food Quality and Preference, 12, 489–498.
- Verbeke, W., Sioen, I., Pieniak, Z., Van Camp, J., & De Henauw, S. (2005). Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about health benefits and safety risks from fish consumption. Public Health Nutrition, 8, 422–429.
- Verbeke, W., & Vackier, I. (2004). Profile and effects of consumer involvement in fresh meat. Meat Science, 67, 159–168.
- Verbeke, W., & Van Kenhove, P. (2002). Impact of emotional stability and attitude on consumption decisions under risk: The Coca-Cola crisis in Belgium. Journal of Health Communication, 7, 455–472.
- Verbeke, W., & Viaene, J. (1999). Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: Empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference, 10, 437–445.
- White, M. P., & Richard Eiser, J. (2005). Information specificity and hazard risk potential as moderators of trust asymmetry. Risk Analysis, 25, 1187–1198.
- Williams, P. R. D., & Hammitt, J. K. (2001). Perceived risks of conventional and organic produce: Pesticides, pathogens, and natural toxins. Risk Analysis, 21, 319–330.