This study investigates the potential impacts of the proposed nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, upon tourism, retirement and job-related migration, and business development in Las Vegas and the state. Adverse impacts may be expected to result from perceptions of risk, stigmatization, and socially amplified reactions to “unfortunate events” associated with the repository (major and minor accidents, discoveries of radiation releases, evidence of mismanagement, attempts to sabotage or disrupt the facility, etc.). The conceptual underpinnings of risk perception, stigmatization, and social amplification are discussed and empirical data are presented to demonstrate how nuclear images associated with Las Vegas and the State of Nevada might trigger adverse economic effects. The possibility that intense negative imagery associated with the repository may cause significant harm to Nevada's economy can no longer be ignored by serious attempts to assess the risks and impacts of this unique facility. The behavioral processes described here appear relevant as well to the social impact assessment of any proposed facility that produces, uses, transports, or disposes of hazardous materials.

REFERENCES

1 K. Finsterbusch, Understanding Social Impacts: Assessing the Effects of Public Projects (Sage, Beverly Hills , California , 1980).
Google Scholar
2 W. R. Freudenburg, “Social Impact Assessment,” Annual Review of Sociology 12, 451–478 (1986).
10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.002315
Web of Science® Google Scholar
3 C. P. Wolf, “Social Impact Assessments: The State of the Art Updated,” Social Impact Assessment 20, 3–22 (1977).
Google Scholar
4 R. Nisbett and T. D. Wilson, “Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes,” Psychological Review 84, 231–259 (1977).
10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
Web of Science® Google Scholar
5 E. J. Baker, D. J. Moss, S. G. West, and J. K. Weyant, Impact. of Offshore Nuclear Generating Stations on Recreational Behavior at Adjacent Coastal Sites (NUREG-0394, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington , D.C. , 1977).
Google Scholar
6 S. G. West and E. J. Baker, “Public Reaction to Nuclear Power: The Case of Offshore Nuclear Power Plants,” in R. F. Kidd and J. M. Saks (eds.), Advances in Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 2 (1983), pp. 101–129.
Google Scholar
7 L. Carter, Nuclear Imperatives and Public Trust: Dealing with Radioactive Waste (Resources for the Future, Washington , D.C. , 1987).
Google Scholar
8 B. L. Cohen, “A Simple Probabilistic Risk Analysis for High-Level Waste Repositories,” Nuclear Technology 68, 73–76 (1985).
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
9 S. A. Weart, Nuclear Fear: A History of Images (Harvard University Press, Cambridge , 1988).
Google Scholar
10 P. Slovic, “Perception of Risk,” Science 236, 280–285 (1987).
10.1126/science.3563507
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11 P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, and B. Fischhoff, “ Images of Disaster: Perception and Acceptance of Risks from Nuclear Power,” in G. Goodman and W. Rowe (eds.), Energy Risk Management (Academic, London , 1979), pp. 223–245.
Google Scholar
12 H. Kunreuther, W. Desvousges, and P. Slovic, “Nevada's Predicament: Public Perceptions of Risk from the Proposed Nuclear Waste Repository,” Environment 30(8), 16–20, 30–33 (1988).
10.1080/00139157.1988.9932541
Web of Science® Google Scholar
13 P. Slovic, M. Layman, and J. Flynn, “Risk Perception, Trust, and Nuclear Waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain,” Environment 33, 6–11, 28–30 (1991).
10.1080/00139157.1991.9931375
Web of Science® Google Scholar
14 R. L. Dupont, Business Week (September 2, 1981), pp. 8–9.
Google Scholar
15 B. L. Cohen, Before It's Too Late: A Scientist's Case for Nuclear Energy (Plenum, New York , 1983).
10.1007/978-1-4684-4577-0
Google Scholar
16 R. E. Kasperson, O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and S. Ratick, “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework,” Risk Analysis 8, 177–187 (1988).
10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 M. L. Mitchell, “The Impact of External Parties on Brand-Name Capital: The 1982 Tylenol Poisonings and Subsequent Cases,” Economic Inquiry 27, 601–618 (October 1989).
10.1111/j.1465-7295.1989.tb00792.x
Web of Science® Google Scholar
18 W. Burns, R. Kasperson, J. Kasperson, O. Renn, S. Emani, and P. Slovic, Social Amplification of Risk: An Empirical Study (unpublished technical report available from Decision Research, Eugene, Oregon, 1990).
Google Scholar
19 A. Mazur, The Dynamics of Technical Controversy (Communications Press, Washington , D.C. , 1981).
Google Scholar
20 J. A. Moore, “Speaking of Data: The Alar Controversy,” EPA Journal 15, 5–9 (MayJune 1989).
Google Scholar
21 M. R. Edelstein, Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure (Westview, Boulder , Colorado , 1988).
Google Scholar
22 J. S. Petterson, “Perception vs. Reality of Radiological Impact: The Goiania Model,” Nuclear News 31, 84–90 (1988).
Google Scholar
23 K. E. Boulding, The Image (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor , 1956).
10.3998/mpub.6607
Google Scholar
24 G. W. Kearsley, “Methodological Change and the Elicitation of Images in Human Geography,” Journal of Mental Imagery 9, 71–82 (1985).
Google Scholar
25 D. J. McInnis and L. L. Price, “The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions,” Journal of Consumer Research 13, 473–491.
Google Scholar
26 A. Paivio, Imagery and Verbal Processes (Erlbaum, Hillsdale , New Jersey , 1979).
Google Scholar
27 T. F. Saarinen and J. L. Sell, “Environmental Perception,” Progress in Human Geography 4, 525–548 (1980).
10.1177/030913258000400403
Google Scholar
28 L. B. Szalay and J. Deese, Subjective Meaning and Culture: An Assessment Through Word Associations (Erlbaum, Hillsdale , New Jersey , 1978).
Google Scholar
29 F. Galton, “Psychometric Experiments,” Brain 2, 149–162 (1880).
10.1093/brain/2.2.149
Google Scholar
30 W. Wundt, “Uber Psychologische Methoden,” Philosophische Studien 1, 1–38 (1883).
Google Scholar
31 S. Freud, Collected Papers (Hogarth, London , 1924).
Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume11, Issue4

December 1991

Pages 683-696

This article also appears in:

Nuclear Power, Weapons and Waste Management: A 40-year Retrospective

Perceived Risk, Stigma, and Potential Economic Impacts of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada

Abstract

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Perceived Risk, Stigma, and Potential Economic Impacts of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada

Abstract

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information