Volume 40, Issue 8 pp. 1070-1076

Visual Confrontation Naming Outcome After Standard Left Anterior Temporal Lobectomy with Sparing Versus Resection of the Superior Temporal Gyrus: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

Bruce Hermann

Corresponding Author

Bruce Hermann

Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. B. P. Hermann at Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, 600 N. Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792, U.S.A.Search for more papers by this author
Keith Davies

Keith Davies

Epi-Care Center, Baptist Memorial Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Semmes-Murphey Clinic, University of Tennessee-Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee-Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin Foley

Kevin Foley

Epi-Care Center, Baptist Memorial Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Semmes-Murphey Clinic, University of Tennessee-Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee-Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Brian Bell

Brian Bell

Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Epi-Care Center, Baptist Memorial Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 August 2005
Citations: 88

Abstract

Summary: Purpose: Intraoperative mapping of eloquent cortex during left (speech dominant) anterior temporal lobectomy has shown a significant proportion of patients to have sites on the anterior superior temporal gyrus at which visual confrontation naming can be disrupted by electrical stimulation. The purpose of this investigation was to conduct a randomized clinical trial to determine whether sparing versus resection of the superior temporal gyrus affected visual confrontation naming outcome after standard left anterior temporal lobectomy. Also examined was the degree to which inherent patient characteristics were associated with language outcome regardless of surgical technique.

Methods: Thirty patients with intractable left temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing standard anterior temporal lobectomy were randomized in regard to whether the superior temporal gyrus was resected or spared. Patients were tested preoperatively and 6–8 months postoperatively by using two conventional tests of visual confrontation naming ability.

Results: No significant differences were found between the groups in either confrontation naming or surgical outcome. Postoperative decline in nominal speech was most closely associated with later age at onset of epilepsy/absence of hippocampal sclerosis.

Conclusions: It appears that specific types of localization-related temporal lobe epilepsy are more closely associated with the risk of adverse language outcome after anterior temporal lobectomy than with the surgical variations investigated in this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me