Volume 26, Issue 2 pp. 233-239
Review

Biological Grafts for Hemodialysis Access: Historical Lessons, State-of-the-Art and Future Directions

Ramanath Dukkipati

Ramanath Dukkipati

Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance and Los Angeles, California

Search for more papers by this author
Marissa Peck

Marissa Peck

Cytograft Tissue Engineering Inc, Novato, California

Search for more papers by this author
Rajiv Dhamija

Rajiv Dhamija

Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, California

Search for more papers by this author
Dirk M Hentschel

Dirk M Hentschel

Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Renal Division, Boston, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Tyler Reynolds

Tyler Reynolds

Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance and Los Angeles, California

Search for more papers by this author
Gautam Tammewar

Gautam Tammewar

Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Torrance and Los Angeles, California

Search for more papers by this author
Todd McAllister

Todd McAllister

Cytograft Tissue Engineering Inc, Novato, California

St. Joseph’s Translational Research Institute, Atlanta, GA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 August 2012
Citations: 22
Address Correspondence to: Ramanath Dukkipati, M.D., Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90509, or e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

The vast majority of arteriovenous grafts (AVG) have been constructed using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). While ePTFE grafts have the advantage of being relatively inexpensive and easy to manufacture, distribute, ship, and store, their primary patency rates are disappointing when compared with the native AVF. Though use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in the United States has increased substantially, approximately 25% of hemodialysis patients continue to use AVG as their vascular access. We present here a comprehensive review of biological grafts and their use in hemodialysis vascular access. In this review, we discuss the use of synthetics and then explore the evolution of biological grafts over the past 20 years, their clinical impact, and future challenges in widespread clinical use in hemodialysis patients. Provided are in depth descriptions of currently used nonbiological arteriovenous grafts and the recent approaches in increasing the patency of synthetic grafts. Recent technological advances using tissue-engineered AVGs have shown promise for patients receiving hemodialysis and their potential to provide an attractive, viable option for vascular access have been discussed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.