Volume 21, Issue 10 pp. 839-843

A Composite Skin Substitute (Graftskin) for Surgical Wounds

A Clinical Experience

WILLIAM H. EAGLSTEIN MD

Corresponding Author

WILLIAM H. EAGLSTEIN MD

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: William H. Eaglstein, MD, University of Miami School of Medicine, Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, P.O. Box 016250 (R-250), Miami, FL 33101.Search for more papers by this author
MANUEL IRIONDO MD

MANUEL IRIONDO MD

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Search for more papers by this author
KAREN LASZLO MD

KAREN LASZLO MD

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: October 1995
Citations: 32

This work supported in part by Organogenesis Inc. and the Dermatology Foundation of Miami.

Abstract

background Bioengineered skin substitutes offer tissue replacement without requiring a donor site and might produce better healing.

objective To evaluate the recipient's response to grafting a bioengineered skin equivalent onto acute surgical wounds.

methods Graftskin, which is made of: 1) a bovine collagen matrix containing human fibroblasts, and 2) an overlying sheet of stratified human epithelium, was grafted onto the excision sites of 15 patients.

results Blood and cell studies for toxicity were negative. Graftskin proved easy to handle, and a typical clinical appearance of the skin substitute during “take” was detected. Compared with expectations improved healing occurred. Twelve of 15 patients had initial clinical takes.

conclusion Graftskin was not clinically rejected and was not toxic. It often appeared to take and produced better than expected healing.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.