Volume 49, Issue 9 pp. 654-659
Free Access

Intrathecal baclofen in children with spastic cerebral palsy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study

Marjanke A Hoving MD

Corresponding Author

Marjanke A Hoving MD

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands

* Correspondence to first author at Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, P Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Elisabeth P M Van Raak MD PhD

Elisabeth P M Van Raak MD PhD

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Geert H J J Spincemaille MD PhD

Geert H J J Spincemaille MD PhD

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Liesbeth J Palmans

Liesbeth J Palmans

Department of Physical Therapy, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Frans A M Sleypen

Frans A M Sleypen

Department of Physical Therapy, Franciscusoord Rehabilitation Centre for Children, Valkenburg, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Johan S H Vles MD PhD

Johan S H Vles MD PhD

Department of Child Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Search for more papers by this author
on behalf of the Dutch Study Group on Child Spasticity

on behalf of the Dutch Study Group on Child Spasticity

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 August 2007
Citations: 51

Abstract

Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy can be very effective in the treatment of intractable spasticity, but its effectiveness and safety have not yet been thoroughly studied in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The aims of this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study were to select children eligible for continuous ITB infusion, to assess the effective ITB bolus dose, and to evaluate the effects, side effects, and complications. Outcome measures included the original Ashworth scale and the Visual Analogue Scale for individually formulated problems. We studied nine females and eight males, aged between 7 and 16 years (mean age 13y 2mo [SD 2y 9mo]). Twelve children had spastic CP and five had spastic-dyskinetic CP. One child was classified on the Gross Motor Function Classification System at Level III, two at Level I V, and 14 at Level V. The test treatment worked successfully for all 17 children with an effective ITB bolus dose of 12.5μg in one, 20μg in another, 25μg in 10, and 50μg in five children. ITB significantly reduced muscle tone, diminished pain, and facilitated ease of care. The placebo did not have these effects. Nine side effects of ITB were registered, including slight lethargy in seven children. Fourteen children had symptoms of lowered cerebrospinal fluid pressure. We conclude that ITB bolus administration is effective and safe for carefully selected children with intractable spastic CP.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.