Volume 26, Issue 2 pp. 89-97

Post-marketing experience with an opioid nasal spray for migraine: lessons for the future

E Loder

Corresponding Author

E Loder

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Elizabeth Loder MD, FACP, Director, Pain and Headache Management Programs, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Tel. + 1 617 573 2493, fax + 1 617 573 7119, e-mail [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 December 2005
Citations: 1

Abstract

In 1992 a nasal spray formulation of butorphanol, an opioid medication intended for pain relief, was marketed in the USA on an unscheduled basis. Only a few years later, amid widespread reports of abuse and dependence, primarily in migraine patients, its manufacturer voluntarily requested the Food and Drug Administration to reschedule the drug as a Schedule IV narcotic. The events surrounding this episode are reviewed, and four problem areas that might have contributed are identified: (i) inadequate review of previous experience with other formulations of butorphanol; (ii) failure to consider the impact of disease state and drug formulation on the risk of adverse events; (iii) the limited scope of clinical trials prior to approval; and (iv) aggressive marketing efforts. The implications of these lessons for future drug development and post-marketing surveillance in the migraine field are considered.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.