Post-marketing experience with an opioid nasal spray for migraine: lessons for the future
Corresponding Author
E Loder
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Elizabeth Loder MD, FACP, Director, Pain and Headache Management Programs, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Tel. + 1 617 573 2493, fax + 1 617 573 7119, e-mail [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
E Loder
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
Elizabeth Loder MD, FACP, Director, Pain and Headache Management Programs, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Tel. + 1 617 573 2493, fax + 1 617 573 7119, e-mail [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In 1992 a nasal spray formulation of butorphanol, an opioid medication intended for pain relief, was marketed in the USA on an unscheduled basis. Only a few years later, amid widespread reports of abuse and dependence, primarily in migraine patients, its manufacturer voluntarily requested the Food and Drug Administration to reschedule the drug as a Schedule IV narcotic. The events surrounding this episode are reviewed, and four problem areas that might have contributed are identified: (i) inadequate review of previous experience with other formulations of butorphanol; (ii) failure to consider the impact of disease state and drug formulation on the risk of adverse events; (iii) the limited scope of clinical trials prior to approval; and (iv) aggressive marketing efforts. The implications of these lessons for future drug development and post-marketing surveillance in the migraine field are considered.
References
- 1 Gillis JC, Benfield P, Goa KL. Transnasal butorphanol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in acute pain management. Drugs 1995; 50: 157–75.
- 2 Fisher MA, Glass S. Butorphanol (Stadol): a study in problems of current drug information and control. Neurology 1997; 48: 1156–60.
- 3 Controlled Substances Act, Title II, Section 801. Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970.
- 4 Evans WS, Bowen JN, Gordano FL, Clark B. A case of stadol dependence. JAMA 1985; 253: 2191–2.
- 5 Brown GR. Stadol dependence: another case. JAMA 1985; 254: 910.
- 6 Smith SG, Davis WM. Nonmedical use of butorphanol and diphenhydramine. JAMA 1984; 252: 1010.
- 7 Migraine drug can be addictive. Beloit Daily News Monday 16 June: 1997.
- 8 Migraines, stadol, addiction and more. Des Moines Register 16 June 1997: 2a.
- 9 Frankel A. ATLA's War Room. The American Lawyer 16 October 2000.
- 10 Accessed at http://www.stadol-addiction-help.com/ on 28 January 2004.
- 11 Accessed at http://neuro-www.mgh.harvard.edu/forum_2/PainF/stadolruinedmyfamily.html on 6 December 2004.
- 12 Accessed at http://neuro-www.mgh.harvard.edu/forum_2/PainF/minetoo.html on 6 December 2004.
- 13 Accessed at. http://neuro-mancer.mgh.harvard.edu/ubb/Forum172/HTML/000002-4.html on 5 December 2004.
- 14 Butorphanol now in Schedule IV. Pharm Today 1997; 3: 1.
- 15 Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Gilman A. The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 6th edn. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1980: 494.
- 16 Drug Abuse Advisory Committee, FDA, 1 June 1978. Proceedings obtainable through the Freedom of Information Act. Reported by Fisher MA et al. (see Footnote 3).
- 17 Jasinski DR, Preston KL. Abuse liability of butorphanol. Bristol-Myers report CHU-G-23505, 1988.
- 18 Sullivan JT, Preston KL, Testa MP, Jasinski DR. Relative abuse liability and pharmacodynamics of transnasal and intramuscular butorphanol. NIDA Res Monogr 1991; 105: 452.
- 19
Jaskinski DR.
Human pharmacology of narcotic antagonists.
J Clin Pharmacol
1979; 7: 287S–290S.
10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb04702.x Google Scholar
- 20 Caplan LR, Thomas C, Banks G. Central nervous system complications of addiction to ‘T's and blues’. Neurology 1982; 32: 623–828.
- 21 United States Code. 21 USC 811(b). 1997.
- 22 Public Citizen Comments on Stadol. Public Citizen's Health Research Group's comments on: Schedules of Controlled Substances: Proposed Placement of Butorphanol into Schedule IV. The Consumer Law News August 11, 1997.
- 23 Gillis JC, Benfield P, Goa KL. Transnasal butorphanol: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in acute pain management. Drugs 1995; 50: 157–75.
- 24 Preston KL, Sullivan JT, Testa M, Jasinski DR. Psychopharmacology and abuse potential of transnasal butorphanol. Alc Drug Depend 1994; 35: 159–67.
- 25 Smith SG, Davis WM. Non-medical use of butorphanol and diphenhydramine. JAMA 1984; 252: 1010.
- 26 Austin RP. Diversion of butorphanol. Am J Hosp Pharm 1983; 40: 1306.
- 27 Butorphanol nasal spray package insert. Physician's desk reference edition, 55th edn. Montvale: Medical Economics Co., 2001.
- 28 Brands B, Sproule B, Marshman J, eds. Drugs and drug abuse – a reference text, 3rd edn. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1998.
- 29 Hoffert MJ, Couch JR, Diamond S, Elkind AH, Goldstein J, Kohlerman NJ et al. Transnasal butorphanol in the treatment of acute migraine. Headache 1995; 35: 65–9.
- 30 Robbins L. Letter to the editor. Headache 1994; 33: 220.
- 31 ‘Spray's claims false, suit says’. Augusta Chronicle 7 March 1998.
- 32 183 F.R.D. 520 (N.D. Ill 1998). Decided 18 November 1998.
- 33 Stadol advertisement. N Engl J Med 1998; 323: 338.
- 34 Package insert for butorphanol nasal spray. Physician's desk reference. Montvale: Medical Economics Co., 2002.
- 35 Singer RS. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC®) in the outpatient treatment of severe pain from migraine headache. Presented at the American Pain Society 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting, Chicago, 20–23 March, 2003.
- 36 Singer RS. Actiq (Oral fentanyl citrate) in the outpatient treatment of ER-bound migrane patients. Headache 2004; 42: 40.
- 37 Landy S. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) for the outpatient treatment of migraine headache pain. Abstract presented at the 22nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Pain Society 20–23 March 2003.
- 38 Prescribing information for oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate. Accessed at http://www.actiq.com/pdf/actiq8pgpi.pdf on 28 January 2004.
- 39 Therapeutic spotlight: crisis management of severe migraine. Alternatives to emergency room care. Neurol Rev (Suppl.) August 2003.
- 40 Singer RS. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in the outpatient treatment of severe pain from migraine headaches. The Pain Clinic 2004; 6: 10–13.
- 41 Loder E. Opioids in chronic nonmalignant pain – has the pendulum swung too far? N Engl Pain Assoc Newsletter 1999; 4: 14.
- 42 Saper JR. The role of chronic opioid therapy in managing chronic daily headache: a roundtable discussion. Presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society, Seattle, WA, 2002.
- 43 Rothrock J. The role of chronic opioid therapy in managing chronic daily headache: a roundtable discussion. Presented at the Annual Scientific Meeting of the American Headache Society, Seattle, WA, 2002.
- 44 Mao J, Sung B, Ji R, Lim G. Chronic morphine induces down regulation of spinal glutamate transporters: implications in morphine tolerance and abnormal pain sensitivity. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 8312–23.
- 45 Mao J, Sung B, Ru-Rong J, Lim G. Neuronal apoptosis associated with morphine tolerance: evidence for an opioid-induced neurotoxic mechanism. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 7650–61.
- 46 Robbins L. Tramadol for tension-type headache. Letter to the editor. Headache 2004; 44: 192–3.
- 47 MaassenVanDenBrink A, Reekers M, Bax WA, Ferrari MD, Saxena PR. Coronary side-effect potential of current and prospective antimigraine drugs. Circulation 1998; 98: 25–30.
- 48 Wood AJJ. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and clopidogrel – a need for new approaches to drug safety (Editorial). N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1824–6.
- 49 Accessed at http://www.pharmacists.ca/content/hcp/tools/drugnews/discontinued.htm on 29 June 2005.
- 50 Accessed at http://www.rpwbcom/Drugs/history.html on 29 June 2005.