Volume 18, Issue 3 pp. 454-459

The burden of headache in Russia: validation of the diagnostic questionnaire in a population-based sample

I. Ayzenberg

I. Ayzenberg

Department of Neurology, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Z. Katsarava

Z. Katsarava

Department of Neurology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
R. Mathalikov

R. Mathalikov

Moscow Medical Setchenov Academy, Moscow, Russia

Search for more papers by this author
M. Chernysh

M. Chernysh

Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Search for more papers by this author
V. Osipova

V. Osipova

Moscow Medical Setchenov Academy, Moscow, Russia

Search for more papers by this author
G. Tabeeva

G. Tabeeva

Moscow Medical Setchenov Academy, Moscow, Russia

Search for more papers by this author
T. J. Steiner

T. J. Steiner

Division of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Imperial College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
on behalf of Lifting The Burden: the Global Campaign to Reduce Burden of Headache Worldwide and the Russian Linguistic Subcommittee of the International Headache Society

on behalf of Lifting The Burden: the Global Campaign to Reduce Burden of Headache Worldwide and the Russian Linguistic Subcommittee of the International Headache Society

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 August 2010
Citations: 45
I. Ayzenberg, Department of Neurology, St. Joseph Hospital, University of Bochum, Gudrunstr 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany (tel.: +49 234 5092411; fax: +49 234 5092414; e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Background: We report validation of the Russian-language version of the Lifting The Burden headache screening and diagnostic questionnaire in a population-based sample of 501 individuals in four cities (Smolensk, Tchelyabinsk, Nishny Novgorod and Tver) and three rural areas (Tula, Tver and Gornyi) of Russia.

Methods: The structured questionnaire, based on ICHD-II criteria, was applied face to face by trained non-medical interviewers calling at randomly selected households. Response rates were about 73% in cities and 80% in rural areas.

Results: Of those responding, 301 reported headache in the previous year; of the total sample, 143 people with and 47 without headache according to the questionnaire were re-interviewed by telephone by one of the two neurologists unaware of the questionnaire diagnoses. Migraine (MIG), either definite (dMIG) or probable (pMIG), was diagnosed by the questionnaire in 72 cases, and tension-type headache (TTH), either definite (dTTH) or probable (pTTH), in 66 cases; the five others with headache were unclassifiable by questionnaire. Physicians diagnosed dMIG or pMIG in 65 cases, dTTH or pTTH in 89 cases and no headache in 31 cases; in five cases, headache was unclassifiable. The questionnaire had sensitivities and specificities of 77% and 82% for MIG (κ = 0.58) and of 64% and 91% for TTH (κ = 0.56).

Conclusions: We concluded that the questionnaire can be utilized in a population-based countrywide survey of the burden attributable to primary headache disorders in Russia.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.