Volume 80, Issue 5 pp. 1147-1178
Original Article

Toward a Tripartite Model of Intrinsic Motivation

Noémie Carbonneau

Corresponding Author

Noémie Carbonneau

Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Comportement Social, Université du Québec à Montréal

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Noémie Carbonneau, Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Comportement Social, Département de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Box 8888, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal (Québec) Canada, H3C 3P8. Email: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Robert J. Vallerand

Robert J. Vallerand

Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Comportement Social, Université du Québec à Montréal

Search for more papers by this author
Marc-André K. Lafrenière

Marc-André K. Lafrenière

Laboratoire de Recherche sur le Comportement Social, Université du Québec à Montréal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 November 2011
Citations: 60
The research was facilitated by a Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Fellowship to the first author and by grants from the SSHRC and the Fonds de Recherche sur la Société et la Culture (FQRSC) to the second author.
Correction added on 11 January 2016, after initial online publication. A duplicate of this article was published under the DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00785.x. This duplicate has now been deleted and its DOI redirected to this version of the article.

Abstract

Intrinsic motivation (IM) refers to engaging in an activity for the pleasure inherent in the activity. The present article presents a tripartite model of IM consisting of IM to know (i.e., engaging in an activity to experience pleasure while learning and trying to understand something new), IM toward accomplishment (i.e., engaging in an activity for the pleasure experienced when attempting task mastery), and IM to experience stimulation (i.e., engaging in an activity for feelings of sensory pleasure). The tripartite model of IM posits that each type of IM can result from task, situational, and personality determinants and can lead to specific types of cognitive, affective, and behavioral outcomes. The purpose of this research was to test some predictions derived from this model. Across 4 studies (Study 1: N = 331; Study 2: N = 113; Study 3: N = 58; Study 4: N = 135), the 3 types of IM as well as potential determinants and consequences were assessed. Results revealed that experiencing one type of IM over the others depends in part on people's personality styles. Also, each type of IM was found to predict specific outcomes (i.e., affective states and behavioral choices). The implications of the tripartite model of IM for motivation research are discussed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.