Full Access
Marketization and Performance Measurement in Swedish Central Government: A Comparative Institutionalist Study
Sven Modell,
Fredrika Wiesel,
Sven Modell
Manchester Business School, the University of Manchester, and Stockholm University School of Business
Search for more papers by this authorSven Modell,
Fredrika Wiesel,
Sven Modell
Manchester Business School, the University of Manchester, and Stockholm University School of Business
Search for more papers by this authorSven Modell ([email protected]) is Professor of Management Accounting, Manchester Business School, the University of Manchester, and Stockholm University School of Business. Fredrika Wiesel is a PhD candidate in the School of Business, Stockholm University.
Previous versions of this article were presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the European Accounting Association, Lisbon, 2007, and seminars at LaTrobe University, Manchester Business School and The University of Sydney. We gratefully acknowledge the constructive comments of an anonymous reviewer and Graeme Dean. The research was funded by the Swedish Research Council. This article was partly completed while the first author was a visiting professor at the University of Technology, Sydney.
Abstract
Public sector organizations have increasingly been subject to varying forms of marketization, ranging from competitive contracting to a more general conception of citizens or users as customers or consumers regardless of whether such economic factors prevail. Drawing on neo-institutional sociology (NIS) and other advances in economic sociology, we examine such marketization efforts as an institutionally embedded phenomenon with particular reference to how it is implicated in the performance measurement practices (PMPs) of two state agencies in Sweden. This reveals how PMPs are embedded in only partly consistent institutional logics and under what circumstances such practices can be reconciled. Some PMPs, especially those grounded in efficiency concerns, tend to play an important constitutive role in operating-level practices, partly as a result of also being embedded in regulatory pressures. Other PMPs, imbued with symbolic meanings signifying a more customer-oriented rationale, only seem to approach such a status if they are dis-embedded from the ‘global’ practices in which they originate and re-embedded in evolving PMPs dominated by efficiency concerns. We discuss the implications of these findings for emerging research into practice variations embedded in competing logics in institutional fields and for policy development.
REFERENCES
- Ahrens, T., and C. S. Chapman, ‘Management Accounting as Practice’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2007.
- Ahrens, T., and J. Dent, ‘Accounting and Organizations: Realizing the Richness of Field Research’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998.
- Alford, J., ‘Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social Exchange Perspective’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2002.
- Alford, J., and R. Speed, ‘Client Focus in Regulatory Agencies: Oxymoron or Opportunity?’, Public Management Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2006.
- Arnaboldi, M., and I. Lapsley, ‘Modern Costing Innovations and Legitimation: A Health Care Study’, Abacus, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2004.
- Beamish, T. D., ‘Economic Sociology in the Next Decade and Beyond’, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 50, No. 8, 2007.
- Beckert, J., ‘What is Sociological About Economic Sociology? Uncertainty and Embeddedness of Economic Action’, Theory and Society, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1996.
- Beckert, J., ‘Economic Sociology and Embeddedness: How Shall We Conceptualize Economic Action?’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2003.
- Bloor, M., ‘On the Analysis of Observational Data: A Discussion of the Worth and Uses of Inductive Techniques and Respondent Validation’, Sociology, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1978.
- Brignall, S., and S. Modell, ‘An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the “New Public Sector”’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2000.
- Brunsson, N., ‘Politicization and “Company-ization”—on Institutional Affiliation and Confusion in the Organizational World’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5, Nos 3/4, 1994.
-
Callon, M., ‘Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics’, in
M. Callon
(ed.), The Laws of the Markets, Blackwell, 1998.
10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03468.x Google Scholar
- Cavalluzzo, K. S., and C. Ittner, ‘Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence From Government’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2004.
- Chang, L.-C., ‘Managerial Responses to Externally Imposed Performance Measurement in the NHS: An Institutional Theory Perspective’, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2006.
- Chua, W. F., ‘Accounting, Measuring, Reporting, and Strategizing—Re-Using Verbs: A Review Essay’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 32, Nos 4/5, 2007.
- Covaleski, M. A., M. W. Dirsmith and S. Samuel, ‘Changes in the Institutional Environment and the Institutions of Governance: Extending the Contributions of Transaction Cost Economics Within the Management Control Literature’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2003.
- D’Aunno, T., M. Succi and J. A. Alexander, ‘The Role of Institutional and Market Forces in Divergent Institutional Change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2000.
- Dacin, T., M. J. Ventresca and B. D. Beal, ‘The Embeddedness of Organizations: Dialogue and Directions’, Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1999.
- Davis, G. F., and C. Marquis, ‘Prospects for Organization Theory in the Early Twenty-First Century: Institutional Fields and Mechanisms’, Organization Science, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2005.
- Dequech, D., ‘Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2003.
- Dillard, J. F., J. T. Rigsby and C. Goodman, ‘The Making and Remaking of Organization Context: Duality and the Institutionalization Process’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2004.
- DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 1, 1983.
- Dyer, W. G., and A. L. Wilkins, ‘Better Stories, not Better Constructs, to Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1991.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., ‘Building Theories From Case Study Research’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1989.
- Eisenhardt, K. M., ‘Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case for Rigour and Comparative Logic’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1991.
- Ellwood, S., ‘Full-Cost Pricing Rules Within the National Health Service Internal Market—Accounting Choices and the Achievement of Productive Efficiency’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1996.
- Fligstein, N., ‘Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, 1996.
- Fligstein, N., and L. Dauter, ‘The Sociology of Markets’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 33, 2007.
- Folger, R., and C. J. Turillo, ‘Theorizing as the Thickness of Thin Abstraction’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1999.
- Fountain, J. E., ‘Paradoxes of Public Sector Customer Service’, Governance, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2001.
- Frumkin, P., and J. Galaskiewicz, ‘Institutional Isomorphism and Public Sector Organizations’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2004.
- Geiger, D. R., and C. D. Ittner, ‘The Influence of Funding Source and Legislative Requirements on Government Cost Accounting Practices’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21, No. 6, 1996.
- Giddens, A., The Constitution of Society, Polity Press, 1984.
- Granlund, M., and K. Lukka, ‘It's a Small World of Management Accounting Practices’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1998.
- Granovetter, M., ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3, 1985.
- Greenwood, R., and C. R. Hinings, ‘Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and New Institutionalism’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1996.
- Hansen, M. B., and J. Lauridsen, ‘The Institutional Context of Market Ideology: A Comparative Analysis of the Values and Perceptions of Local Government CEOs in 14 OECD Countries’, Public Administration, Vol. 82, No. 4, 2004.
- Hensmans, M., ‘Social Movement Organizations: A Metaphor for Strategic Actors in Institutional Fields’, Organization Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2003.
- Holmblad Brunsson, K., ‘Management or Politics—or Both? How Management by Objectives May be Managed—a Swedish Example’, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2002.
- Hood, C., and G. Peters, ‘The Middle Ageing of New Public Management: Into an Age of Paradox?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2004.
- Hopper, T., and M. Major, ‘Extending Institutional Analysis Through Theoretical Triangulation: Regulation and Activity-Based Costing in Portuguese Telecommunications’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2007.
- Hung, S.-C., ‘The Plurality of Institutional Embeddedness as a Source of Organizational Attention Difference’, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 11, 2005.
- Hussain, M. M., and Z. Hoque, ‘Understanding Non-Financial Performance Measurement Practices in Japanese Banks: A New Institutional Sociology Perspective’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2002.
- Johnsen, Å., ‘Implementation Mode and Local Government Performance Measurement: A Norwegian Experience’, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1999.
- Keating, P. J., ‘A Framework for Classifying and Evaluating the Theoretical Contributions of Case Research in Management Accounting’, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1995.
- Kelly, J. M., ‘The Dilemma of the Unsatisfied Customer in a Market Model of Public Administration’, Public Administration Review, Vol. 65, No. 1, 2005.
- Kondra, A. Z., and C. R. Hinings, ‘Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory’, Organization Studies, Vol. 19, No. 5, 1998.
- Kraatz, M. S., and E. J. Zajac, ‘Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, No. 5, 1996.
- Krippner, G. R., and A. S. Alvarez, ‘Embeddedness and the Intellectual Projects of Economic Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 33, 2007.
- Lawrence, S., and U. Sharma, ‘Commodification of Education and Academic Labour—Using the Balanced Scorecard in a University Setting’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2002.
- Lindkvist, L., ‘Performance Based Compensation in Health Care—a Swedish Experience’, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1996.
- Lounsbury, M., ‘Institutional Sources of Practice Variation: Staffing College and University Recycling Programs’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2001.
- Lounsbury, M., ‘A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2007.
- Lounsbury, M., ‘Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33, Nos 4/5, 2008.
- Lounsbury, M., and E. T. Crumley, ‘New Practice Creation: An Institutional Perspective on Innovation’, Organization Studies, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2007.
- Martinez, R. J., and T. Dacin, ‘Efficiency Motives and Normative Forces: Combining Transaction Costs and Institutional Logic’, Journal of Management, Vol. 25, No. 1, 1999.
- McGuire, L., ‘Service Charters—Global Convergence or National Divergence? A Comparison of Initiatives in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States’, Public Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2002.
- Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2, 1977.
- Meyer, M. W., and L. G. Zucker, Permanently Failing Organizations, Sage, 1989.
- Miller, P., ‘The Margins of Accounting’, in M. Callon (ed.), The Laws of the Markets, Blackwell, 1998.
- Ministry of Finance, Ekonomisk styrning för effektivitet och transparens [Management Control for Efficiency and Transparency], The Ministry, 2000.
- Modell, S., ‘Performance Measurement and Institutional Processes: A Study of Managerial Responses to Public Sector Reform’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2001.
- Modell, S., ‘Institutional Perspectives on Cost Allocations: Integration and Extension’, European Accounting Review, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2002.
- Modell, S., ‘Goals Versus Institutions: The Development of Performance Measurement in the Swedish University Sector’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2003.
- Modell, S., ‘Performance Measurement Myths in the Public Sector: A Research Note’, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2004.
- Modell, S., ‘Students as Consumers? An Institutional Field-Level Analysis of the Construction of Performance Measurement Practices’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2005.
- Modell, S., ‘Internationell utblick och jämförelse’[International Overview and Comparison], in S. Modell and A. Grönlund (eds), Effektivitet och styrning i statliga myndigheter [Performance Management in Central Government], Studentlitteratur, 2006a.
- Modell, S., ‘Den statliga myndighetssektorn som organisatoriskt fält’[Central Government as an Organizational Field], in S. Modell and A. Grönlund (eds), Effektivitet och styrning i statliga myndigheter [Performance Management in Central Government], Studentlitteratur, 2006b.
- Modell, S., and A. Grönlund, ‘Outcome-Based Performance Management: Experiences From Swedish Central Government’, Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2007.
- Modell, S., K. Jacobs and F. Wiesel, ‘A Process (Re)turn? Path Dependencies, Institutions and Performance Management in Swedish Central Government’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007.
- Molander, P., J.-E. Nilsson and J.-E. Schick, Does Anyone Govern? The Relationship Between the Government Office and the Agencies in Sweden, SNS Förlag, 2002.
- Moynihan, D. P., ‘Why and How Do State Governments Adopt and Implement “Managing for Results” Reforms?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2004.
- National Audit Office, Sex år med beställar/utförarmodellen—en granskning av konkurrensutsättningen av Vägverkets driftstjänster [Six Years With the Purchaser/Provider Model—a Review of the Exposure of Operating Services to Competition Within the Swedish Road Administration], National Audit Office, 1998.
- Northcott, D., and N. France, ‘The Balanced Scorecard in New Zealand Health Sector Performance Management: Dissemination and Diffusion’, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2005.
- Ogden, S. G., ‘Accounting for Organizational Performance: The Construction of the Customer in the Privatized Water Industry’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 22, No. 6, 1997.
- Oliver, C., ‘Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1991.
- Oliver, C., ‘The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization’, Organization Studies, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1992.
- Østergren, K., ‘The Institutional Construction of Consumerism: A Study of Implementing Quality Indicators’, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2006.
- Pierre, J., ‘Central Agencies in Sweden: A Report from Utopia’, in C. Pollitt and C. Talbot (eds), Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualization, Routledge, 2004.
- Pollitt, C., ‘Bringing Consumers Into Performance Measurement: Concepts, Consequences and Constraints’, Policy and Politics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1988.
- Pollitt, C., ‘Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2006.
- Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert, Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, 2000.
- Potter, B., ‘Accounting as a Social and Institutional Practice: Perspectives to Enrich our Understanding of Accounting Change’, Abacus, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2005.
- Potter, J., ‘Consumerism and the Public Sector: How Well Does the Coat Fit?’, Public Administration, Vol. 66, No. 2, 1988.
-
Powell, W. W., ‘Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis’, in
W. W. Powell and
P. DiMaggio
(eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, 1991.
10.1063/1.105960 Google Scholar
- Quist, J., P. Skålén and S. R. Clegg, ‘The Power of Quality Models: The Example of the SIQ Model for Performance Excellence’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2007.
- Rahaman, A. S., S. Lawrence and J. Roper, ‘Social and Environmental Reporting at the VRA: Institutionalized Legitimacy or Legitimation Crisis?’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2004.
- Roberts, P. W., and R. Greenwood, ‘Integrating Transaction Cost and Institutional Theories: Toward a Constrained Efficiency Framework for Understanding Organizational Design Adoption’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1997.
- Sanderson, I., ‘Evaluation, Learning and the Effectiveness of Public Services: Towards a Quality of Public Services Model’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 9, Nos 5/6, 1996.
- Scott, W. R., ‘The Adolescence of Institutional Theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1987.
- Scott, W. R., Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed., Sage, 2001.
- Scott, W. R., and J. W. Meyer, ‘The Organization of Societal Sectors’, in J. W. Meyer and W. R. Scott (eds), Organizational Environments. Ritual and Rationality, Sage, 1983.
- Seal, W., ‘Accounting and Competitive Tendering in U.K. Local Government: An Institutionalist Interpretation’, Financial Accountability and Management, 15, Nos 3/4, 1999.
- Seo, M.-G., and W. E. D. Creed, ‘Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective’, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2002.
- Sharifi, S., and T. Bovaird, ‘The Financial Management Initiative in the U.K. Public Sector: The Symbolic Role of Performance Reporting’, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 18, Nos 2/3, 1995.
- SIQ, SIQs modell för kundorienterad verksamhetsutveckling [The SIQ Model for Performance Excellence], Swedish Institute for Quality Assurance, 2006.
- Siti-Nabiha, A. K., and R. W. Scapens, ‘Stability and Change: An Institutionalist Study of Management Accounting Change’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2005.
- Sundström, G., Stat på villovägar. Resultatstyrningens framväxt i historiskt-institutionellt perspektiv [The State at a Loss. The Development of Managing for Results From a Historical-Institutional Perspective], Stockholm University, Department of Political Science, 2003.
- Tsamenyi, M., J. Cullen and J. M. G. Gonzalez, ‘Changes in Accounting and Financial Information System in a Spanish Electricity Company: A New Institutional Theory Analysis’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2006.
- Van Helden, J. G., ‘Researching Public Sector Transformation: The Role of Management Accounting’, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005.
- Walsh, K., ‘Citizens and Consumers: Marketing and Public Sector Management’, Public Money and Management, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1991.
- Watkins, A. L., and C. E. Arrington, ‘Accounting, New Public Management and American Politics: Theoretical Insights Into the National Performance Review’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2007.
- Westphal, J. D., R. Gulati and S. M. Shortell, ‘Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1997.
- Yin, R. K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, 1984.
- Zukin, S., and P. DiMaggio, ‘Introduction’, in C. Zukin and P. DiMaggio (eds), Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
