Volume 21, Issue 7 pp. 763-768

Inhaled micronized crystalline human insulin using a dry powder inhaler: dose-response and time-action profiles1

K. Rave

Corresponding Author

K. Rave

Profil Institute for Metabolic Research, Neuss, Germany and

Klaus Rave, Profil Institute for Metabolic Research, Hellersbergstr. 9, D-41460 Neuss, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
L. Nosek

L. Nosek

Profil Institute for Metabolic Research, Neuss, Germany and

Search for more papers by this author
L. Heinemann

L. Heinemann

Profil Institute for Metabolic Research, Neuss, Germany and

Search for more papers by this author
C. Gonzales

C. Gonzales

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
C. S. Ernest

C. S. Ernest

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
J. Chien

J. Chien

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
D. Muchmore

D. Muchmore

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 May 2004
Citations: 24
1

Previously published abstract

Rave K, Muchmore D, Gonzales C, Chien JY, Ernest CS, Nosek L, Heinemann L. Inhaled insulin with an improved Spiros® dry powder inhaler: Dose-response and time-action profiles. Diabetologia 2001; 44: (Suppl. 1): A211.

Abstract

Aim  The aim of this euglycaemic glucose clamp study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics, glucodynamics, safety and tolerability of micronized crystalline human insulin inhalation powder delivered by a Spiros® dry powder inhaler system in healthy volunteers.

Methods  Thirteen healthy, non-smoking, male and female volunteers [age 30 ± 7 years; BMI 23.5 ± 2.7 kg/m2; (mean ± sd)] with normal pulmonary function participated in an open-label, randomised, 6-period crossover trial. Each volunteer received four single doses of inhaled insulin (60, 90, 120, 150 U) on separate occasions. For comparison, each volunteer also received two of three possible doses of subcutaneous (s.c.) injected regular human insulin (8, 14, or 20 U).

Results  Serum immunoreactive insulin following inhalation of insulin peaked an average of 60 min earlier compared with s.c. injected insulin (P < 0.0001). Following inhalation, the time to maximum glucose infusion rate occurred an average of 70 min earlier than with s.c. insulin: 187, 129, 161 and 162 min vs. 227, 241 and 241 min (P < 0.0001). The dose-response relationships for serum insulin pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics were linear for both inhaled and s.c. insulin. Relative bioavailability (based on serum insulin levels) ranged from 11.5 to 12.2% for the four doses of inhaled insulin and relative biopotency (based on glucose infusion rates) was 10.0 to 16.5%, respectively. Dosing was well tolerated by all volunteers.

Conclusion  This study demonstrates that inhalation of human insulin via a dry powder inhaler system provides a promising alternative route for administration of insulin.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.