The messages they send: e-mail use by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)
Gina Conti-Ramsden
Human Communication and Deafness, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorKevin Durkin
School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAllan J. Walker
School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Search for more papers by this authorGina Conti-Ramsden
Human Communication and Deafness, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Search for more papers by this authorKevin Durkin
School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAllan J. Walker
School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background: Contemporary adolescents use e-mail for a variety of purposes, including peer communication and education. Research into these uses has focused on typically developing individuals; much less is known about the use of e-mail by exceptional youth.
Aims: The present study examined the structure and form of e-mail messages sent by adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI).
Methods & Procedures: Thirty-eight adolescents with a history of SLI and 56 typically developing (TD) peers were assessed on measures of nonverbal abilities, core language skills and literacy skills (reading and spelling). The participants were asked to compose an e-mail reply to a standard e-mail sent by an experimenter. These reply e-mails were coded for linguistic structure, readability and spelling errors. Two adult raters, blind to the participants’ language ability, judged how understandable the e-mails were, how grammatically correct the e-mails were, and also the sender's command of the English language.
Outcomes & Results: Adolescents with a history of SLI produced e-mails that were similar to those sent by their TD peers in terms of structure and readability. However, they made significantly more spelling errors. Furthermore, the adult raters considered the messages from participants with a history of SLI to be of poorer standard than those sent by their TD peers.
Conclusions & Implications: The findings suggest that the e-mail messages of adolescents with a history of SLI provide indicators of the sender's language and literacy skills. Implications for intervention and technology development are discussed.
References
- Baron, N. S., 2002, Who sets e-mail style? Prescriptivism, coping strategies, and democratizing communication access. Information Society, 18, 403–413.
- Bishop, D. V. M. and Clarkson, B., 2003, Written language as a window into residual language deficits: a study of children with persistent and residual speech and language impairments. Cortex, 39, 215–237.
- Bishop, D. V. M. and Snowling, M. J., 2004, Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886.
- Bryant, J. A., Sanders-Jackson, A. and Smallwood, A. M. K., 2006. IMing, Text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11, 577–592.
- Conti-Ramsden, G. and Botting, N., 1999a, Classification of children with specific language impairment: longitudinal considerations. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 1195–1204.
- Conti-Ramsden, G. and Botting, N., 1999b, Characteristics of children attending language units in England: a national study of 7-year-olds. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 359–366.
- Conti-Ramsden, G. and Botting, N., 2000, Educational placements for children with specific language impairments. In E. G. Bishop and L. B. Leonard (eds), Speech and Language Impairments in Children: Causes, Characteristics, Intervention and Outcome ( Hove : Psychology Press), pp. 211–226.
- Conti-Ramsden, G., Crutchley, A. and Botting, N., 1997, The extent to which psychometric tests differentiate subgroups of children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 765–777.
- Dockrell, J., Lindsay, G., Connelly, V. and Mackie, C., 2007, Constraints in the production of written text in children with specific language impairments. Exceptional Children, 73, 147–164.
- Ducheneaut, N. and Bellotti, V., 2003, Ceci n’est pas un objet? Talking about objects in e-mail. Human–Computer Interaction, 18, 85–110.
- Durkin, K., Conti-Ramsden, G., Walker, A. and Simkin, Z., 2009, Educational and interpersonal uses of home computers by adolescents with and without specific language impairment (SLI). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 197–217.
- Flesch, R., 1948, A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233.
- Friedman, D. B. and Hoffman-Goetz, L., 2006, A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Education and Behaviour, 33, 352–373.
- Hair, M., Renaud, K. V. and Ramsay, J., 2007, The influence of self-esteem and locus of control on perceived email-related stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2791–2803.
- Information Mapping Inc. , 2005, E-mail and the Decline of Business Communications . IMI White Paper Series.
-
Kincaid, J. P.,
Fishburne, R. P.,
Roberts, R. L. and
Chissom, B. S., 1975, Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel (
Memphis
,
TN
: Naval Air Station, Research Branch Report).
10.21236/ADA006655 Google Scholar
- Leitao, S. and Fletcher, J., 2004, Literacy outcomes for students with speech impairment: long-term follow-up. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39, 245–256.
- Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A. and Macgill, A. R., 2008, Writing, Technology and Teens ( Washington , DC : Pew Internet & American Life Project) (available at: http://www.pewinternet.org).
- Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S. and Purcell, K., 2010, Teens and Mobile Phones ( Washington , DC : Pew Internet & American Life Project) (available at: http://www.pewinternet.org).
- Lenhart, A., Madden, M. and Hitlin, P., 2005, Teens and Technology: Youth Are Leading the Transition to a Fully Wired and Mobile Nation ( Washington , DC : Pew Internet & American Life Project) (available at: http://www.pewinternet.org).
- Leonard, L. B., 1998, Children with Specific Language Impairment ( Cambridge , MA : MIT Press).
- Livingstone, S. and Bovill, M., 2001, Families and the Internet: An Observational Study of Children and Young People's Internet Use. Final report to BT ( London : London School of Economics).
- Livingstone, S. and Brake, D., 2010, On the rapid rise of social networking sites: new findings and policy implications. Children and Society, 24, 75–83.
- Madell, D. E. and Muncer, S. J., 2007, Control over social interactions: an important reason for young people's use of Internet and mobile phones for communication? CyberPsychology and Behavior, 10, 137–140.
- Mckinley, N. and Larson, V. L., 1989, Students who can't communicate: speech–language service at the secondary level. Curriculum Report, 19, 1–8.
- Meade, C. D. and Byrd, J. C., 1989, Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 204–206.
- Montgomery, J. W., 2006, Real-time language processing in school-age children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 275–291.
-
Munter, M.,
Rogers, P. S. and
Rymer, J., 2003, Business e-mail: guidelines for users.
Business Communication Quarterly, 66, 26–40.
10.1177/108056990306600104 Google Scholar
- Overbaugh, R. C. and Casiello, A. R., 2008, Distributed collaborative problem-based graduate level learning: students’ perspectives on communication tool selection and efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 497–515.
- Pendharker, P. C. and Young, K., 2004, The development of a construct for measuring an individual's perceptions of email as a medium for electronic communication in organizations. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 47, 130–143.
- Pennington, B. and Bishop, D., 2009, Relations among speech, language and reading disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 283–306.
- Phillips, J. G. and Reddie, L., 2007, Decisional style and self-reported email use in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2414–2428.
- Puranik, C. S., Lombardino, L. J. and Altmann, L. J., 2007, Writing through retellings: an exploratory study of language-impaired and dyslexic populations. Reading and Writing, 20, 251–272.
- S. Radicati (ed.), 2010, Email Statistics Report, 2010–2014 (Palo Alto, CA: The Radicati Group) (available at: http://www.radicati.com/?p=5282).
- Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H. and Secord, W. A., 2003, Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals—4 ( San Antonio , TX : Psych Corporation/Harcourt).
-
Simkin, Z. and
Conti-Ramsden, G., 2006, Evidence of reading difficulties in subgroups of children with specific language impairment.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 22, 315–331.
10.1191/0265659006ct310xx Google Scholar
- Soucek, R. and Moser, K., 2010, Coping with information overload in email communication: evaluation of a training intervention. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1458–1466.
- St Clair, M., Durkin, K., Conti-Ramsden, G. and Pickles, A., 2010, Growth of reading skills in children with a history of specific language impairment (SLI): the role of autistic symptomatology and language related abilities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 109–131.
- Stothard, S. E., Snowling, M. J., Bishop, D. V. M., Chipchase, B. B. and Kaplan, C., 1998, Language impaired preschoolers: a follow-up into adolescence. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 41, 407–418.
- Subrahmanyam, K. and Greenfield, P. M., 2008, Communicating online: adolescent relationships and the media. Future of Children; Children and Media Technology, 18, 119–146.
- Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., Buckwalter, P., Zhang, X., Smith, E. and O’brien, M., 1997, Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 1245–1260.
- Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. W. and Rashotte, C. A., 1999, Test of Word Reading Efficiency ( Austin , TX : PRO-ED).
- Volckaert-Legrier, O., Bernicot, J. and Bert-Erboul, A., 2009, Electronic mail, a new written language register: a study with French-speaking adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 161–181.
- Wechsler, D., 1999, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence ( San Antonio , TX : Psychological Corporation).
- Wetherell, D., Botting, N. and Conti-Ramsden, G., 2007, Narrative in adolescent specific language impairment (SLI): a comparison with peers across two different narrative genres. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, 583–605.
- Whittaker, S., 2005, Supporting collaborative task management in e-mail. Human–Computer Interaction, 20, 49–88.
- Wilkinson, G. S., 1993, The Wide Range Achievement Test— 3rd Edition ( Wilmington , DE : Wide Range).