Volume 79, Issue 11 pp. 789-793

Cerebral gunshot wounds: a score based on three clinical parameters to predict the risk of early mortality

Michael Stoffel

Corresponding Author

Michael Stoffel

Departments of Neurosurgery and

Michael Stoffel, Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr, 22, 81677 Munich, Germany. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Norbert Hüser

Norbert Hüser

Surgery, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Kathrina Kayser

Kathrina Kayser

Department of Trauma Surgery, CH Baragwanath Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Monika Kriner

Monika Kriner

Institute for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Elias Degiannis

Elias Degiannis

Department of Trauma Surgery, CH Baragwanath Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Dietrich Doll

Dietrich Doll

Surgery, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany

Department of Trauma Surgery, CH Baragwanath Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 November 2009
Citations: 7

M. Stoffel MD; N. Hüser MD; K. Kayser MD; M. Kriner PhD; E. Degiannis MD; D. Doll MD.

Abstract

Background: To provide a score to predict the risk of early mortality after single craniocerebral gunshot wound (GSW) based on three clinical parameters.

Methods: All patients admitted to Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa, between October 2000 and May 2005 for an isolated single craniocerebral GSW were retrospectively evaluated for the documentation of (i) blood pressure (BP) on admission; (ii) inspection of the bullet entry and exit site; and (iii) initial consciousness (n= 214).

Results: Conscious GSW victims had an early mortality risk of 8.3%, unconscious patients a more than fourfold higher risk (39.2%). Patients with a systolic BP between 100 and 199 mm Hg had an 18.2% risk of mortality. Hypotension (<100 mm Hg) doubled this risk (37.7%) and severe hypertension (≥200 mm Hg) was associated with an even higher mortality rate of 57.1%. Patients without brain spilling out of the wound (‘non-oozer’) exhibited a mortality of 19.7%, whereas it was twice as high (43.3%) in patients with brain spill (‘oozer’). By logistic regression, a prognostic index for each variant of the evaluated parameters could be established: non-oozer:0, oozer:1, conscious:0, unconscious:2, 100 ≤RRsys < 200 mm Hg:0, RRsys < 100 mm Hg:1, RRsys≥ 200 mm Hg:2. This resulted in a score (0–5) by which the individual risk of early mortality after GSW can be anticipated.

Conclusions: Three immediately obtainable clinical parameters were evaluated and a score for predicting the risk of early mortality after a single craniocerebral GSW was established.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.