Volume 18, Issue s12 pp. 67-71

Soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) levels in renal transplant recipients

Rajil Mehta

Rajil Mehta

 Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

Search for more papers by this author
Gaurang Shah

Gaurang Shah

 Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

Search for more papers by this author
William Adler

William Adler

 Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dilip Kittur

Dilip Kittur

 Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 June 2004
Citations: 25
Dilip Kittur, Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University Hospital, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Tel.: +1 (315) 464-6644; fax: +1 (315) 464-6250;
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Allograft rejection is associated with T cell activation. T cell activation leads to secretion of soluble IL-2 receptor and elevated serum soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) levels. However, the clinical implication of individual elevated sIL-2 receptor levels is unclear. We followed levels of sIL-2R pre- and post-transplantation to determine if sIL-2R levels predict rejection episodes or degree of graft function.

Materials and methods: Serum samples of 12 patients who underwent living or cadaveric renal transplant were followed weekly with serial sIL-2R levels. These levels were followed until the serum creatinine reached a baseline. Of the 12 patients, three patients developed delayed graft function. The remaining nine patients were followed for a period of 3 months. Sera of these nine patients in the initial 3 months post-transplant were monitored for sIL-2R levels. For comparison, sIL-2R levels were also measured in 150 healthy volunteers and five dialysis patients.

Results: Recipients undergoing severe rejection episodes had higher overall serum levels of sIL-2R (1515 ± 496 U/mL) as compared with recipients who had stable renal transplants and no episodes of rejection (698 ± 333 U/mL) (P= 0.034). Comparison of sIL-2R ratios (post-transplant sIL-2R level/pre-transplant sIL-2R level) revealed that ratios of 0.6 or higher were more frequently seen in patients who subsequently underwent severe rejection episodes. Dialysis patients were found to have higher sIL-2R levels (2605 ± 1312 U/mL) compared with renal transplant patients (1047 ± 192 U/mL) (P< 0.001) and healthy volunteers (349 ± 185 U/mL) (P< 0.001).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that individual levels of sIL-2R are not predictive of rejection in the early post-transplant period, but s-IL2R ratios greater than 0.6 may be predictive of severe rejection episodes.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.