Volume 7, Issue 2 pp. 206-210
Original Articles

Appropriate allocation of pediatric donor kidneys

R. C. Kockelbergh

R. C. Kockelbergh

Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
D. M. A. Francis

Corresponding Author

D. M. A. Francis

Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

A/Prof D. M. A. Rancis MD Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital. Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia Telephone (03)3427703. Fax number (03)3478332.Search for more papers by this author
R. J. Millar

R. J. Millar

Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
R. G. Walker

R. G. Walker

Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
C. Jones

C. Jones

Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
G. Becker

G. Becker

Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 April 1993
Citations: 3

Abstract

Optimal allocation of pediatric donor kidneys is controversial. We reviewed the outcome of transplanting pediatric donor kidneys into children and adults, together with the outcome of transplanting adult kidneys into adults and children, with the aim of identifying the most appropriate donor-recipient combinations. Three-year graft survival was 73% in 23 adults transplanted with pediatric kidneys, 87% in 23 adults given adult kidneys, 93% in 15 children who received adult kidneys, but only 64% in 11 children who received pediatric kidneys (p <0.05). All single kidneys from donors less than 2.5 years of age failed because of acute rejection early after transplantation. The study does not support the allocation of pediatric kidneys specifically to children and questions the use of single kidneys from very small donors.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.