Representativeness of child controls recruited by random digit dialling
Corresponding Author
Helen D. Bailey
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, and
Helen Bailey, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, PO BOX 855, Perth, WA 6872, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorElizabeth Milne
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, and
Search for more papers by this authorNicholas de Klerk
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, and
Search for more papers by this authorLin Fritschi
Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA,
Search for more papers by this authorCarol Bower
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, and
Search for more papers by this authorJohn Attia
University of Newcastle, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Newcastle, NSW,
Search for more papers by this authorBruce K. Armstrong
Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Helen D. Bailey
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, and
Helen Bailey, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, PO BOX 855, Perth, WA 6872, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorElizabeth Milne
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, and
Search for more papers by this authorNicholas de Klerk
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, and
Search for more papers by this authorLin Fritschi
Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA,
Search for more papers by this authorCarol Bower
Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Centre for Child Health Research, and
Search for more papers by this authorJohn Attia
University of Newcastle, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Newcastle, NSW,
Search for more papers by this authorBruce K. Armstrong
Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Bailey HD, Milne E, de Klerk N, Fritschi L, Bower C, Attia J, Armstrong BK. Representativeness of child controls recruited by random digit dialling. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2010.
Recruiting control subjects who are representative of the population from which the cases are drawn is a challenge in case–control studies. This paper examines the performance of random digit dialling (RDD) in obtaining a control sample, and the sample's representativeness of the population with respect to socio-economic status.
The study subjects were recruited from 2003 to 2006 for a national, population-based case–control study investigating causes of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in children <15 years of age in Australia. Control families' addresses were linked to Australian Bureau of Statistics Census 2006 Collection Districts and thus to Socio-Economic Indexes for Area scores, which are area-based measures of socio-economic status. These scores were compared with those of all collection districts where families lived.
We estimate that 55% of eligible families in the RDD sample agreed to participate in the study. Participation was directly related to socio-economic status with those of highest economic status most likely to participate. Completeness of participation in the components of data collection was similarly related to socio-economic status. This evidence of selection according to socio-economic status indicates that there may also be selection with respect to other factors potentially important in the aetiology of ALL.
References
- 1 Wacholder S, McLaughlin JK, Silverman DT, Mandel JS. Selection of controls in case-control studies. 1. Principles. American Journal of Epidemiology 1992; 135: 1019–1028.
- 2 Olson SH, Kelsey JL, Pearson TA, Levin B. Evaluation of random digit dialing as a method of control selection in case-control studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 1992; 135: 210–222.
- 3 Brogan DJ, Denniston MM, Liff JM, Flagg EW, Coates RJ, Brinton LA. Comparison of telephone sampling and area sampling: response rates and within-household coverage. American Journal of Epidemiology 2001; 153: 1119–1127.
- 4 Mertens AC, Robison LL. Evaluation of parental participation in a case-control study of infant leukaemia. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 1997; 11: 240–246.
- 5 Australian Bureau of Statistics. Information Paper: An Introduction to Socio-Economic Indexes, 2006 [Internet]. Catalogue number 2039.0; Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2008. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/D729075E079F9FDECA2574170011B088/$File/20390_2006.pdf[last accessed May 2008].
- 6 Australian Bureau of Statistics. SEIFA Data Cube only, 2006 – Data only, ‘Table 1. Census Collection District (CD) SEIFA Summary, 2006’, data cube: Excel spreadsheet [Internet]. Cat. no. 2033.0.55.001; Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2008. http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/7D366066CBD1D00ACA256E850001423E/$File/81593_oct%202003.pdf[last accessed May 2008].
- 7 Australian Bureau of Statistics. ‘ACT, NSW, NT, Other Territories, QLD, SA, Victoria, WA, Tasmania, (Collection Districts) Basic Community Profile: Tables: B04 Age by Sex: Ages 0–4, 5–9, 10–14 (Total persons),B24 Family Composition: Couple family with children <15, One Parent family with children <15 (Total families)’. Retrieved from 2006 Census DataPacks, CD-ROM, Release 2, Cat. no. 2069.0.30.001; Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2007.
- 8
White E,
Armstrong BK,
Saracci R.
Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology: Collecting, Evaluating, and Improving Measures of Disease Risk Factors, 2nd
edn.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198509851.001.0001 Google Scholar
- 9 Law GR, Smith AG, Roman E. The importance of full participation: lessons from a national case – control study. British Journal of Cancer 2002; 86: 350–355.
- 10 Australian Bureau of Statistics. Household Telephone Connections, Queensland, Oct 2003 [Internet]. Catalogue number 8159.3; Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004.
- 11 Mezei G, Spinelli JJ, Wong P, Borugian M, McBride ML. Assessment of selection bias in the Canadian case-control study of residential magnetic field exposure and childhood leukemia. American Journal of Epidemiology 2008; 167: 1504–1510.
- 12 Richiardi L, Boffetta P, Merletti F. Analysis of nonresponse bias in a population-based case-control study on lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2002; 55: 1033–1040.
- 13 Mensah FK, Willett EV, Simpson J, Smith AG, Roman E. Birth order and sibship size: evaluation of the role of selection bias in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. American Journal of Epidemiology 2007; 166: 717–723.
- 14 Ma X, Buffler PA, Layefsky M, Does MB, Reynolds P. Control selection strategies in case-control studies of childhood diseases. American Journal of Epidemiology 2004; 159: 915–921.
- 15 Hum L, Kreiger N, Finkelstein MM. The relationship between parental occupation and bone cancer risk in offspring. International Journal of Epidemiology 1998; 27: 766–771.
- 16 Wen WQ, Shu XO, Steinbuch M, Severson RK, Reaman GH, Buckley JD, et al. Paternal military service and risk for childhood leukemia in offspring. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 151: 231–240.
- 17 Holly EA, Bracci PM, Hong MK, Mueller BA, Preston-Martin S. West Coast study of childhood brain tumours and maternal use of hair-colouring products. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2002; 16: 226–235.
- 18 van Wijngaarden E, Stewart PA, Olshan AF, Savitz DA, Bunin GR. Parental occupational exposure to pesticides and childhood brain cancer. American Journal of Epidemiology 2003; 157: 989–997.
- 19 Olshan AF, Smith JC, Bondy ML, Neglia JP, Pollock BH. Maternal vitamin use and reduced risk of neuroblastoma. Epidemiology 2002; 13: 575–580.
- 20 Bunin GR, Kushi LH, Gallagher PR, Rorke-Adams LB, McBride ML, Cnaan A. Maternal diet during pregnancy and its association with medulloblastoma in children: a children's oncology group study (United States). Cancer Causes and Control 2005; 16: 877–891.
- 21 Menegaux F, Ripert M, Hemon D, Clavel J. Maternal alcohol and coffee drinking, parental smoking and childhood leukaemia: a French population-based case-control study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2007; 21: 293–299.
- 22 Chen Z, Stewart PA, Davies S, Giller R, Krailo M, Davis M, et al. Parental occupational exposure to pesticides and childhood germ-cell tumors. American Journal of Epidemiology 2005; 162: 858–867.
- 23 Spector LG, Xie Y, Robison LL, Heerema NA, Hilden JM, Lange B, et al. Maternal diet and infant leukemia: the DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor hypothesis: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 2005; 14: 651–655.
- 24 Cooney MA, Daniels JL, Ross JA, Breslow NE, Pollock BH, Olshan AF. Household pesticides and the risk of Wilms tumor. Environmental Health Perspectives 2007; 115: 134–137.
- 25 Lancashire RJ, Sorahan T. Breastfeeding and childhood cancer risks: OSCC data. British Journal of Cancer 2003; 88: 1035–1037.
- 26 Kerr MA, Nasca PC, Mundt KA, Michalek AM, Baptiste MS, Mahoney MC. Parental occupational exposures and risk of neuroblastoma: a case-control study (United States). Cancer Causes and Control 2000; 11: 635–643.
- 27 Rosenbaum PF, Buck GM, Brecher ML. Early child-care and preschool experiences and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. American Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 152: 1136–1144.
- 28 Meinert R, Kaletsch U, Kaatsch P, Schuz J, Michaelis J. Associations between childhood cancer and ionizing radiation: results of a population-based case-control study in Germany. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 1999; 8: 793–799.
- 29 Infante-Rivard C, Siemiatycki J, Lakhani R, Nadon L. Maternal exposure to occupational solvents and childhood leukemia. Environmental Health Perspectives 2005; 113: 787–792.
- 30 Dockerty JD, Herbison P, Skegg DC, Elwood M. Vitamin and mineral supplements in pregnancy and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a case-control study. BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 136.
- 31 MacArthur AC, McBride ML, Spinelli JJ, Tamaro S, Gallagher RP, Theriault GP. Risk of childhood leukemia associated with vaccination, infection, and medication use in childhood. American Journal of Epidemiology 2008; 167: 598–606.
- 32 Yu CL, Wang SF, Pan PC, Wu MT, Ho CK, Smith TJ, et al. Residential exposure to petrochemicals and the risk of leukemia: using geographic information system tools to estimate individual-level residential exposure. American Journal of Epidemiology 2006; 164: 200–207.
- 33 Kabuto M, Nitta H, Yamamoto S, Yamaguchi N, Akiba S, Honda Y, et al. Childhood leukemia and magnetic fields in Japan: a case-control study of childhood leukemia and residential power-frequency magnetic fields in Japan. International Journal of Cancer 2006; 119: 643–650.
- 34 Bunin GR, Spector LG, Olshan AF, Robison LL, Roesler M, Grufferman S, et al. Secular trends in response rates for controls selected by random digit dialing in childhood cancer studies: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. American Journal of Epidemiology 2007; 166: 109–116.
- 35 Spector LG, Ross JA, Puumala SE, Roesler M, Olshan AF, Bunin GR. Feasibility of nationwide birth registry control selection in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology 2007; 166: 852–856.
- 36 Poole C, Greenland S, Luetters C, Kelsey JL, Mezei G. Socioeconomic status and childhood leukaemia: a review. International Journal of Epidemiology 2006; 35: 370–384.
- 37 Borugian MJ, Spinelli JJ, Mezei G, Wilkins R, Abanto Z, McBride ML. Childhood leukemia and socioeconomic status in Canada. Epidemiology 2005; 16: 526–531.
- 38 Bower C, Miller M, Payne J, Serna P. Promotion of folate for the prevention of neural tube defects: who benefits? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2005; 19: 435–444.
- 39 Martin LT, McNamara M, Milot A, Bloch M, Hair EC, Halle T. Correlates of smoking before, during, and after pregnancy. American Journal of Health Behavior 2008; 32: 272–282.
- 40 Hernan MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 2004; 15: 615–625.