Volume 18, Issue 4 pp. 277-280

Trends in neural tube defects in Western Australia in Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations

Carol Bower

Corresponding Author

Carol Bower

Birth Defects Registry of Western Australia,

Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, Western Australia

Professor Carol Bower, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, PO Box 855, West Perth, Western Australia 6872. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Sandra Eades

Sandra Eades

Menzies School of Health Research, Northern Terrritory, and

Search for more papers by this author
Jan Payne

Jan Payne

Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, Western Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Heather D’Antoine

Heather D’Antoine

Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, Western Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Fiona Stanley

Fiona Stanley

Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, Perth, Western Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 July 2004
Citations: 39

Summary

Neural tube defects (NTD) were 43% more common in Indigenous than in non-Indigenous infants in Western Australia in the 1980s, and there has been a fall in NTD overall in Western Australia since promotion of folate and voluntary fortification of food has occurred. In order to investigate whether the fall had occurred in both indigenous and non-Indigenous infants, data on NTD (births and terminations) were obtained from the WA Birth Defects Registry, and on all births from the Maternal and Child Health Research Data Base. Knowledge of folate was asked in a survey of indigenous women interviewed postpartum. Before the promotion of folate (1980–92), there has been a 42% increase in NTD in Indigenous compared with non-Indigenous infants (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 1.94]); while in the most recent period (1996–2000), the prevalence in Indigenous infants was almost twice that of non-Indigenous infants (PR 1.98 [CI 1.25, 3.15]). Fifty-five per cent of Indigenous women knew about folate in pregnancy. Similar to sudden infant death syndrome, this study has highlighted health promotion that has been successful in reducing the risk of a childhood condition overall, but has failed to be effective for Indigenous children.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.