Volume 400, Issue 3 pp. 1593-1602

Probing the epoch of reionization with Milky Way satellites

Joseph A. Muñoz

Corresponding Author

Joseph A. Muñoz

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, MS 10, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

E-mail: [email protected]

Hubble Fellow.

Search for more papers by this author
Piero Madau

Piero Madau

Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Abraham Loeb

Abraham Loeb

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, MS 10, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jürg Diemand

Corresponding Author

Jürg Diemand

Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA

E-mail: [email protected]

Hubble Fellow.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 December 2009
Citations: 15

ABSTRACT

While the connection between high-redshift star formation and the local Universe has recently been used to understand the observed population of faint dwarf galaxies in the Milky Way (MW) halo, we explore how well these nearby objects can probe the epoch of first light. We construct a detailed, physically motivated model for the MW satellites based on the state-of-the-art Via Lactea II dark-matter simulations. Our model incorporates molecular hydrogen (H2) cooling in low-mass systems and inhomogeneous photoheating feedback during the internal reionization of our own Galaxy. We find that the existence of MW satellites fainter than MV≈− 5 is strong evidence for H2 cooling in low-mass haloes, while satellites with −5 > MV > −9 were affected by hydrogen cooling and photoheating feedback. The age of stars in very low-luminosity systems and the minimum luminosity of these satellites are key predictions of our model. Most of the stars populating the brightest MW satellites could have formed after the epoch of reionization. Our models also predict a significantly larger dispersion in M300 values than observed and a number of luminous satellites with M300 as low as 106  M.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.