Volume 14, Issue 2 pp. 95-106

Buying Time II: an economic evaluation of a joint NHS/Social Services residential rehabilitation unit for older people on discharge from hospital

Annie Ellis BSc MSc Certificate

Annie Ellis BSc MSc Certificate

Centre for Evidence-Based Social Services, Institute of Health & Social Care Research, Peninsula Medical School, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exetre, EX1 2LU, UK

Mid Devon Primary Care Research Group, Wyndham House Surgery, Silverton, Devon EX5 4HZ, UK,

Search for more papers by this author
Tessa Trappes-Lomax BSc MA Certificate/Postqualifying Certificate MPhil

Tessa Trappes-Lomax BSc MA Certificate/Postqualifying Certificate MPhil

South Hams & West Devon Primary Care Trust, The Lescaze Offices, Shinners Bridge, Dartington, TQ9 6JE, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Mary Fox BSc MSc

Mary Fox BSc MSc

Mid Devon Primary Care Research Group, Wyndham House Surgery, Silverton, Devon EX5 4HZ, UK,

Search for more papers by this author
Rod Taylor BSc PhD Postgraduate Certificate

Rod Taylor BSc PhD Postgraduate Certificate

Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK,

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Power CQ

Michael Power CQ

Centre for Social Policy, The Warren House Group, Dartington, Totnes, TQ9 6EG, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan Stead MBBS MRCGP MPhil

Jonathan Stead MBBS MRCGP MPhil

Mid Devon Primary Care Research Group, Wyndham House Surgery, Silverton, Devon EX5 4HZ, UK,

Search for more papers by this author
Ian Bainbridge BA Diploma

Ian Bainbridge BA Diploma

Social Care Services for Older People (Phase 3), Social Services Inspectorate, 40 Berkeley Square, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1HP, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 February 2006
Citations: 4
Annie Ellis Research Facilitator Mid Devon Primary Care Research Group Wyndham House Surgery Silverton Devon EX5 4HZ UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The study's aim was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of an NHS/Social Services short-term residential rehabilitation unit (a form of intermediate care) for older people on discharge from community hospital compared with ‘usual’ community services. An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a prospective controlled trial, which explored the effectiveness of a rehabilitation unit in a practice setting. The aim of the unit was to help individuals regain independence. A matched control group went home from hospital with the health/social care services they would ordinarily receive. The research was conducted in two matched geographical areas in Devon: one with a rehabilitation unit, one without. Participants were recruited from January 1999 to October 2000 in 10 community hospitals and their eligibility determined using the unit's strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, including 55 years or older and likely to benefit from a short-term rehabilitation programme: potential to improve, realistic, achievable goals, motivation to participate. Ninety-four people were recruited to the intervention and 112 to the control group. Details were collated of the NHS and Social Services resources participants used over a 12-month follow-up. The cost of the resource use was compared between those who went to the unit and those who went straight home. Overall, costs were very similar between the two groups. Aggregated mean NHS/Social Services costs for the 12 months of follow-up were £8542.28 for the intervention group and £8510.68 for the control. However, there was a clear ‘seesaw’ effect between the NHS and Social Services: the cost of the unit option fell more heavily on Social Services (£5011.56, whereas £3530.72 to the NHS), the community option more so on the NHS (£5146.74, whereas £3363.94 to Social Services). This suggests that residential rehabilitation for older people is no more cost-effective over a year after discharge from community hospital than usual community services. The variability in cost burden between the NHS and Social Services has implications for ‘who pays’ and being sure that agencies share both pain and gain.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.