Volume 19, Issue 2 pp. 172-177

Salivary gland dysfunction (‘dry mouth’) in patients with cancer: a consensus statement

A. DAVIES frcp, consultant

Corresponding Author

A. DAVIES frcp, consultant

Palliative Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey

Andrew Davies, Consultant in Palliative Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK (e-mail: [email protected]). Search for more papers by this author
J. BAGG phd, professor

J. BAGG phd, professor

Clinical Microbiology, Glasgow Dental School, Glasgow

Search for more papers by this author
D. LAVERTY msc, nurse consultant

D. LAVERTY msc, nurse consultant

Palliative Care, St Joseph's Hospice, London

Search for more papers by this author
P. SWEENEY phd, clinical senior lecturer

P. SWEENEY phd, clinical senior lecturer

Special Care Dentistry, Glasgow Dental School, Glasgow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
M. FILBET md, director

M. FILBET md, director

Palliative Care Unit, University Hospital Lyon Sud, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
K. NEWBOLD md, consultant clinical oncologist

K. NEWBOLD md, consultant clinical oncologist

Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
J. DE ANDRÉS md, associate professor

J. DE ANDRÉS md, associate professor

Anesthesiology, General University Hospital, Valencia, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
S. MERCADANTE md, director

S. MERCADANTE md, director

the Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Pain Relief and Palliative Care Units, University of Palermo La Maddalena Cancer Centre, Palermo, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 February 2010
Citations: 15

Abstract

DAVIES A., BAGG J., LAVERTY D., SWEENEY P., FILBET M., NEWBOLD K., DE ANDRÉS J. & MERCADANTE S. (2010) European Journal of Cancer Care19, 172–177
Salivary gland dysfunction (‘dry mouth’) in patients with cancer: a consensus statement

A group of interested professionals was convened to develop some evidence-based recommendations on the management of salivary gland dysfunction (SGD) in oncology patients. A Medline search was performed to identify the literature on SGD. The abstracts of all identified papers were read, and the full texts of all relevant papers were reviewed. The evidence was graded according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network grading system for recommendations in evidence-based guidelines. The summary of the main recommendations are: (1) patients with cancer should be regularly assessed for SGD (grade of recommendation – D); (2) the management of SGD should be individualised (D); (3) consideration should be given to strategies to prevent the development of radiation-induced SGD (C); (4) consideration should be given to treatment of the cause(s) of the SGD (C); (5) the treatment of choice for the symptomatic management of SGD is use of an appropriate saliva stimulant (C); (6) consideration should be given to prevention of the complications of the SGD (D); (7) consideration should be given to treatment of the complications of the SGD (D); and (8) patients with SGD should be regularly reassessed (D).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.