Volume 134, Issue 6 pp. 632-639

Patient self-management of anticoagulation therapy: a trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis

Sue Jowett

Sue Jowett

Health Economics Facility, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham

Search for more papers by this author
Stirling Bryan

Stirling Bryan

Health Economics Facility, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham

Search for more papers by this author
Ellen Murray

Ellen Murray

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah McCahon

Deborah McCahon

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham

Search for more papers by this author
James Raftery

James Raftery

Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
F. D. Richard Hobbs

F. D. Richard Hobbs

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham

Search for more papers by this author
David Fitzmaurice

David Fitzmaurice

Department of Primary Care and General Practice, University of Birmingham, Birmingham

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 August 2006
Citations: 38
Ms Sue Jowett, Health Economics Facility, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Park House, 40 Edgbaston Park Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2RT, UK.
E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

Demand for anticoagulation management is increasing due to an expansion of clinical indications for therapy. One possible model of care to meet demand is patient self-management (PSM), beneficial to patients who need control over their condition. This study aimed to determine the cost and cost-effectiveness of PSM of anticoagulation compared with routine clinic-based care for patients receiving long-term anticoagulation. A cost–utility analysis was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial; 617 patients were recruited and followed up for 12 months. There was no significant difference in mean quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) between groups – after adjusting for baseline, the mean difference in QALYs was 0·009 (95% CI, −0·012 to 0·030). Overall mean healthcare costs in the PSM arm were significantly higher at £417 (CI £394–£442) compared with £122 (CI £103–£144) in the control arm. Therefore, using a formal cost-effectiveness analysis, PSM of anticoagulation does not appear to be cost-effective. However, PSM may have other benefits in relieving pressure on traditional clinic-based care, and the cost-effectiveness of this model of care for some subgroups of anticoagulation patients needs to be explored further.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.