Volume 160, Issue 6 pp. 1273-1285

Laser and other light therapies for the treatment of acne vulgaris: systematic review

F.L. Hamilton

F.L. Hamilton

Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
J. Car

J. Car

Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
C. Lyons

C. Lyons

Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
M. Car

M. Car

Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
A. Layton

A. Layton

Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, North Yorkshire and York PCT, Harrogate HG2 7SX, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
A. Majeed

A. Majeed

Department of Primary Care and Social Medicine, Imperial College London, London W6 8RP, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 May 2009
Citations: 72
Fiona Hamilton.
E-mail:
[email protected]

Conflicts of interest
F.L.H., J.C., A.M. and M.C. declare no competing interests. C.L. provides a private cosmetic dermatology service, which includes the use of laser therapies. A.L. has acted as an advisory consultant and researcher holding small grants for basic science and clinical research related to acne. She has been supported by a number of pharmaceutical companies linked to acne therapy over the years and has presented at pharmacy-supported symposia.

Summary

Background Acne is common and can lead to scarring of the skin, as well as to psychological distress and reduced self-esteem. Most topical or oral treatments for acne are inconvenient and have side-effects. Laser and other light therapies have been reported to be convenient, safe and effective in treating acne.

Objectives To carry out a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of light and laser therapies for acne vulgaris.

Methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, LILACS, ISI Science Citation Index and Dissertation Abstracts International for relevant published trials.

Results We identified 25 trials (694 patients), 13 of light therapy and 12 of light therapy plus light-activated topical cream (photodynamic therapy, PDT). Overall, the results from trials of light alone were disappointing, but the trials of blue light, blue–red light and infrared radiation were more successful, particularly those using multiple treatments. Red–blue light was more effective than topical 5% benzoyl peroxide cream in the short term. Most trials of PDT showed some benefit, which was greater with multiple treatments, and better for noninflammatory acne lesions. However, the improvements in inflammatory acne lesions were not better than with topical 1% adapalene gel, and the side-effects of therapy were unacceptable to many participants.

Conclusions Some forms of light therapy were of short-term benefit. Patients may find it easier to comply with these treatments, despite the initial discomfort, because of their short duration. However, very few trials compared light therapy with conventional acne treatments, were conducted in patients with severe acne or examined long-term benefits of treatment.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.