Volume 159, Issue 5 pp. 1138-1143

Methyldibromoglutaronitrile allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds

L.A. Fischer

L.A. Fischer

The National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, Ledreborg Allé 40, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
J.D. Johansen

J.D. Johansen

The National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, Ledreborg Allé 40, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
T. Menné

T. Menné

The National Allergy Research Centre, Department of Dermatology, University of Copenhagen, Gentofte Hospital, Ledreborg Allé 40, 2820 Gentofte, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 October 2008
Citations: 10
Louise Arup Fischer.
E-mail: [email protected]

Conflicts of interest
None declared.

Summary

Background Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (MDBGN) is a preservative, which was approved for use in cosmetics in the mid-1980s. The incidence of allergy to MDBGN rose during the 1990s, but is now decreasing due to regulatory intervention. Experimental studies with other allergens have shown a significant relationship between the patch test and the repeated open application test (ROAT) reactivity.

Objectives To study the relationship between elicitation threshold doses at single occluded exposure and repeated open application, using MDBGN as the allergen.

Methods Eighteen subjects allergic to MDBGN were tested with a dilution series of MDBGN in a patch test and a ROAT (duration up to 21 days). Seventeen people with no MDBGN allergy were included as a control group for the ROAT.

Results The response frequency for the ROAT (in μg MDBGN cm−2 per application) was significantly higher than the response frequency for the patch test, while the response frequency for the accumulated ROAT dose, at 1, 2 and 3 weeks was very similar to the patch test response frequency; indeed there was no statistical significant difference.

Conclusions For elicitation of MDBGN allergy the response frequency for the patch test is lower than the response frequency (per application) for the ROAT, but approximately the same as the response frequency for the accumulated ROAT doses. This is important for risk assessment in general.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.