Volume 105, Issue 7 pp. 1176-1189

Smoking cessation in severe mental illness: what works?

Lindsay Banham

Corresponding Author

Lindsay Banham

South London and the Maudsley Mental Health Trust, Beckenham, Kent, UK and

Department of Health Sciences, and Hull York Medical School, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, York, UK

Lindsay Banham, Lambeth Hospital, 108 Landor Road, London SW9 9NU, UK. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Simon Gilbody

Simon Gilbody

Department of Health Sciences, and Hull York Medical School, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, York, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 June 2010
Citations: 187

ABSTRACT

Aims  The physical health of people with severe mental illness (SMI) is poor. Smoking-related illnesses are a major contributor to excess mortality and morbidity. An up-to-date review of the evidence for smoking cessation interventions in SMI is needed to inform clinical guidelines.

Methods  We searched bibliographic databases for relevant studies and independently extracted data. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of smoking cessation or reduction conducted in adult smokers with SMI. Interventions were compared to usual care or placebo. The primary outcome was smoking cessation and secondary outcomes were smoking reduction, change in weight, change in psychiatric symptoms and adverse events.

Results  We included eight RCTs of pharmacological and/or psychological interventions. Most cessation interventions showed moderate positive results, some reaching statistical significance. One study compared behavioural support and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to usual care and showed a risk ratio (RR) of 2.74 (95% CI 1.10–6.81) for short-term smoking cessation, which was not significant at longer follow-up. We pooled five trials that effectively compared bupropion to placebo giving an RR of 2.77 (95% CI 1.48–5.16), which was comparable to Hughes et al.'s 2009 figures for general population data; RR = 1.69 (95% CI 1.53–1.85). Smoking reduction data were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis, but results were generally positive. Trials suggest few adverse events. All trials recorded psychiatric symptoms and the most significant changes favoured the intervention groups over the control groups.

Conclusions  Treating tobacco dependence is effective in patients with SMI. Treatments that work in the general population work for those with severe mental illness and appear approximately equally effective. Treating tobacco dependence in patients with stable psychiatric conditions does not worsen mental state.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.