Volume 25, Issue 10 pp. 1019-1024
Original Article
Free Access

Comparison of Three Electron Microscopy Techniques for the Detection of Human Rotaviruses

Pierre Trépanier

Pierre Trépanier

Université du Québec, Centre de Recherche en Virologie, and Centre de Recherche en Immunologie, Institut Armand-Frappier, C.P. 100, Laval, Québec, Canada, H7N 4Z3

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Alain

Robert Alain

Université du Québec, Centre de Recherche en Virologie, and Centre de Recherche en Immunologie, Institut Armand-Frappier, C.P. 100, Laval, Québec, Canada, H7N 4Z3

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Valeriu Micusan

Valeriu Micusan

Université du Québec, Centre de Recherche en Virologie, and Centre de Recherche en Immunologie, Institut Armand-Frappier, C.P. 100, Laval, Québec, Canada, H7N 4Z3

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Bernadette McLaughlin

Bernadette McLaughlin

Université du Québec, Centre de Recherche en Virologie, and Centre de Recherche en Immunologie, Institut Armand-Frappier, C.P. 100, Laval, Québec, Canada, H7N 4Z3

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Laurent Berthiaume

Laurent Berthiaume

Université du Québec, Centre de Recherche en Virologie, and Centre de Recherche en Immunologie, Institut Armand-Frappier, C.P. 100, Laval, Québec, Canada, H7N 4Z3

Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Ste-Justine, Montréal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: October 1981
Citations: 4

Abstract

Rotavirus detection by direct electron microscopy was compared with direct and indirect immune electron microscopy techniques. The latter two approaches permitted the enumeration of 25 and 103 times more rotaviruses respectively, than direct electron microscopy. Also, 70% and 90% of the virus particles were aggregated by direct and indirect immune electron microscopy techniques respectively, thus facilitating their detection.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.