MATE CHOICE, GENETIC INCOMPATIBILITY, AND OUTBREEDING IN THE ORNATE DRAGON LIZARD, CTENOPHORUS ORNATUS
Natasha R. LeBas
Department of Zoology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia
Department of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK. E-mail: [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorNatasha R. LeBas
Department of Zoology, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia
Department of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, UK. E-mail: [email protected].
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Abstract There has been recent interest in the role genetic incompatibility may play in mate or sperm choice. One source of incompatibility may be too similar or disparate genomes. An isolated population of the ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus, was followed over a breeding season and parentage assigned to the offspring using microsatellites. It was found that the adults in the population had an eight per cent chance of mating with a relative. I examined whether C. ornatus mate (or fertilize their eggs) with respect to genetic similarity. There was no difference in a female's relatedness to the male in whose territory she resided and her average relatedness to all other males. Neither was there a difference in the relatedness of the male that sired a female's offspring and the female's average relatedness to all other males. There was no evidence of a cost to mating with a more genetically similar mate, because offspring survival was not influenced by degree of inbreeding or outbreeding. However, females that were more outbred had fewer offspring survive. In this small population there are two possible explanations for the decreased fitness associated with outbreeding. First, the species may have an evolutionary history of inbreeding and thus may be susceptible to outbreeding depression. Second, as fitter individuals produce more offspring, these offspring have an increased probability of breeding with relatives, leading to an indirect relationship between fitness and outbreeding.
Literature Cited
- Barnard, C. J., and J. Fitzsimons. 1988. Kin recognition and mate choice in mice: the effects of kinship, familiarity and social interference on intersexual selection. Anim. Behav. 36: 1078–1090.
- Bateson, P. 1982. Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail. Nature 295: 236–237.
- Bateson, P. 1983. Optimal outbreeding, Pp. 257–277 in P. Bateson, ed. Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge , U.K.
- Bensch, S., D. Hasselquist, and T. Von Schantz. 1994. Genetic similarity between parents predicts hatching failure: noninces-tuous inbreeding in the great reed warbler. Evolution 48: 317–326.
- Bradshaw, S. D. 1963. The biology of Amphibolurus ornatus. Thesis, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
- Brooker, M. G., I. Rowley, M. Adams, and P. R. Baverstock. 1990. Promiscuity: An inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 191–199.
- Brown, A. F. 1991. Outbreeding depression as a cost of dispersal in the harpacticoid copepod, Tigriopus californicus. Biol Bull. 181: 123–126.
- Bull, C. M., and S. J. B. Cooper. 1999. Relatedness and avoidance of inbreeding in the lizards, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav. Ecol. So-ciobiol. 46: 367–372.
- Bull, C. M., M. Doherty, L. R. Schulze, and Y. Pamula. 1994. Recognition of offspring by females of the Australian skink, Tiliqua rugosa. J. Herpetol. 28: 117–120.
- Burley, N., C. Minor, and C. Strachan. 1990. Social preferences of zebra finches for siblings, cousins and non-kin. Anim. Behav. 39: 775–784.
- Ciszek, D. 2000. New colony formation in the “highly inbred” eusocial naked mole-rat: Outbreeding is preferred. Behav. Ecol. 11: 1–6.
- Coltman, D. W., W. D. Bowen, and J. M. Wright. 1998. Birth weight and neonatal survival of harbour seal pups are positively correlated with genetic variation measured my microsatellites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 803–809.
- Coulson, T., S. Albon, J. Slate, and J. Pemberton. 1999. Microsatellite loci reveal sex-dependent responses to inbreeding and out-breeding in red deer calves. Evolution 53: 1951–1960.
- Coulson, T. N., J. M. Pemberton, S. D. Albon, M. Beaumont, T. C. Marshall, J. Slate, F. E. Guinness, and T. H. Clutton-Brock. 1998. Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer. Proc.R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 489–495.
- Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York .
- Gibbs, H. L., and P. R. Grant. 1989. Inbreeding in Darwin's medium ground finches (Geospiza fortis). Evolution 43: 1273–1284.
- Goodnight, K. F., and D. C. Queller. 1999. Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers. Molec. Ecol. 8: 1231–1234.
- Gullberg, A., M. Olsson, and H. Tegelstrom. 1999. Evolution in populations of Swedish sand lizards: genetic differentiation and loss of variability revealed by multilocus DNA fingerprinting. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 17–26.
- Hoglund, J. L. 1992. Levels of inbreeding among prairie dogs. Am. Nat. 139: 591–602.
- Jimenez, J. A., K. A. Hughes, G. Alaks, L. Graham, and R. C. Lacy. 1994. An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science 266: 271–273.
- Keane, B. 1990. The effect of relatedness on reproductive success and mate choice in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leu-copus. Anim. Behav. 39: 264–273.
- Keller, L. F., P. Arcese, J. N. M. Smith, W. M. Hochachka, and S. C. Stearns. 1994. Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck. Nature 372: 356–357.
- Knowlton, N., and J. B. C. Jackson. 1993. Inbreeding and out-breeding in marine invertebrates. Pp. 200–249 in N. W. Thorn-hill, ed. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago , IL .
- LeBas, N. R. 2001. Microsatellite determination of male reproductive success in a natural population of the territorial ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Molec. Ecol. 10: 193–204.
- LeBas, N. R., and P. B. S. Spencer. 2000. Polymorphic microsat-ellite markers in the ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Molec. Ecol. 9: 365–366.
- Madsen, T., B. Stille, and R. Shine. 1996. Inbreeding depression in an isolated population of adders, Vipera berus. Biol. Conserv. 75: 113–118.
- Main, A. R., and C. M. Bull. 1996. Mother-offspring recognition in two Australian lizards, Tiliqua rugosa and Egernia stokesii. Anim. Behav. 52: 193–200.
- Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. E. B. Kruuk, and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molec. Ecol. 7: 639–655.
- Marshall, T. C., and J. A. Spalton. 2000. Simultaneous inbreeding and outbreeding in reintroduced Arabian oryx. Anim. Conserv. 3: 241–248.
- Ober, C., T. Hyslop, S. Elias, L. R. Weitkamp, and W. W. Hauck. 1998. Human leukocyte antigen matching and fetal loss: results of a 10-year prospective study. Hum. Reprod. 13: 33–38.
- Olsson, M., A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelstrom. 1996a. Malformed offspring, sibling matings, and selection against inbreeding in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). J. Evol. Biol. 9: 229–242.
- Olsson, M., T. Madsen, R. Shine, A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelstrom. 1994. Rewards of promiscuity. Nature 372: 230.
- Olsson, M., R. Shine, T. Madsen, A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelstrom. 1996b. Sperm selection by females. Nature 383: 585.
- Pemberton, J. M., D. W. Coltman, T. N. Coulson, and J. Slate. 1999. Using microsatellites to measure the fitness consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding. Pp. 151–164 in D. Goldstein and C. Schlotterer, eds. Microsatellites: Evolution and applications. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford , U.K.
- Pusey, A., and M. Wolf. 1996. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 201–206.
- Queller, D. C., and K. F. Goodnight. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43: 258–275.
- Ralls, K., P. H. Harvey, and A. M. Lyles. 1986. Inbreeding in natural populations of birds and mammals. Pp. 35–56 in M. Soule, ed. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sin-auer, Sunderland , MA .
- Saccheri, I., M. Kuussaari, M. Kankare, P. Vikman, W. Fortelius, and I. Hanski. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392: 491–494.
- Shields, W. M. 1982. Philopatry, inbreeding avoidance, and the evolution of sex. State Univ. of New York Press, Albany , NY .
- Shine, R., and S. J. Downes. 1999. Can pregnant lizards adjust their offspring phenotypes to environmental conditions Oecologia 119: 1–8.
- Sillero-Zubiri, C., D. Gottelli, and D. W. MacDonald. 1996. Male philopatry, extra-pack copulations and inbreeding avoidance in Ethiopian wolves (Canis simensis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 331–340.
- Stockley, P., J. B. Searle, D. W. MacDonald, and C. S. Jones. 1993. Female multiple mating behaviour in the common shrew as a strategy to reduce inbreeding. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 254: 173–179.
- Templeton, A. R. 1986. Coadapation and outbreeding depression. Pp. in M. Soule ed. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland , MA .
- Tregenza, T., and N. Wedell. 2000. Genetic compatibility and mate choice. Molec. Ecol. 9: 1013–1027.
- van Noordwijk, A. J., and W. Scharloo. 1981. Inbreeding in an island population of the great tit. Evolution 35: 674–688.
- Waser, N. M. 1993. Population strucure, optimal outbreeding, and assortative mating in angiosperms. Pp. 89–107 in N. W. Thorn-hill, ed. The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago , IL .
- Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97–159.
- Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ .
- Zeh, J. A., and D. W. Zeh. 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1711–1717.
- Zeh, J. A., and D. W. Zeh. 1997. The evolution of polyandry II: postcopulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 69–75.