Volume 55, Issue 9 pp. 1815-1821
Free Access

COSTS OF COUNTERDEFENSES TO HOST RESISTANCE IN A PARASITOID OF DROSOPHILA

Alex R. Kraaijeveld

Alex R. Kraaijeveld

Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Population Biology and Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Kerry A. Hutcheson

Kerry A. Hutcheson

Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Population Biology and Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth C. Limentani

Elizabeth C. Limentani

Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Population Biology and Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
H. Charles J. Godfray

H. Charles J. Godfray

Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Population Biology and Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, United Kingdom

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 May 2007
Citations: 61

Abstract

Abstract The ability of a parasitoid to evolve enhanced counterdefenses against host resistance and its possible costs were studied in a Drosophila-parasitoid system. We reared Asobara tabida (Braconidae, Hymenoptera) exclusively on D. melanogaster to impose artificial selection for improved counterdefenses against cellular encapsulation, the main host defense against parasitism. Controls were reared on D. subobscura, the main host of the population of wasps from which the laboratory culture was derived and a species that never encapsulates parasitoids. We observed improved survival and avoidance of encapsulation in all five selection lines compared to their paired control lines, although there was unexpected variation among pairs. Improved survival was associated with parasitoid eggs becoming embedded in host tissue, where they were protected from circulating haemocytes. There were no differences among lines in average adult size, fat content, egg load, or performance on D. subobscura. However, the duration of the egg stage in selection lines was longer than that of control lines, probably because of reduced nutrient and/or oxygen supply when eggs are embedded in host tissue. We suggest that this delay in hatching reduces the probability of parasitoid survival if another parasitoid egg is laid in the same host (superparasitism or multiparasitism) and hence is a cost of enhanced counterdefenses against host resistance.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.