Volume 45, Issue 8 pp. 864-869
Brief Communications

What is the evidence status of Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC)? Insight from a matching exercise with the guidelines for echocardiography

R. Fonseca

R. Fonseca

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
K. Negishi

K. Negishi

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
T. H. Marwick

Corresponding Author

T. H. Marwick

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, Australia

Correspondence

Thomas H. Marwick, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Private Bag 23, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 July 2015
Citations: 8
Funding: R. Fonseca is supported by a scholarship from the Farrell Foundation, Hobart, Australia.
Conflict of interest: None.

Abstract

There is interest in adapting the American Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for transthoracic echocardiography to Australian practice. We matched 90 of 98 AUC with the guidelines (53 appropriate, 12 sometimes appropriate, 25 rarely appropriate), but eight lacked any match. Among the matched criteria, 76 (82%) indications were concordant with the guidelines. A stronger evidence base would be desirable to settle these discrepancies before Australian adoption of AUC.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.