Volume 31, Issue 4 pp. 379-385
Original Article

Does intensity-modulated radiation therapy by helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer increase the subsequent risk of bladder cancer? A propensity score-matched analysis

Fumio Tsukuda

Corresponding Author

Fumio Tsukuda

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence

Fumio Tsukuda, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Higashikoiwa, Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Yasunari Tanaka

Yasunari Tanaka

Department of Urology, Juntendo University Nerima Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shuichiro Narita

Shuichiro Narita

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Toshihiro Shimizu

Toshihiro Shimizu

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shu Nakasuka

Shu Nakasuka

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kiichi Hagiwara

Kiichi Hagiwara

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Noboru Sakamoto

Noboru Sakamoto

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kawano Toshihiro

Kawano Toshihiro

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yutaka Horiguchi

Yutaka Horiguchi

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shoji Koga

Shoji Koga

Department of Urology, Edogawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 January 2024
Citations: 2

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of bladder cancer after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer in comparison to the risk post-radical prostatectomy (RP) using propensity score-matched analysis and to assess the risk factors for bladder cancer.

Methods

This retrospective study included 2067 patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer treated at our institution between June 2007 and December 2016. Of these, 1547 patients were treated with IMRT and 520 underwent RP. The propensity scores were calculated using age, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification, prostate volume, Brinkman index, and follow-up time as matched covariates. A propensity score-matched patient cohort (n = 718; IMRT: 359, RP: 359) was created, and the risk of bladder cancer after treatment was compared.

Results

In total, bladder cancer was detected in 33 patients. Five patients in the IMRT group and one in the RP group died of bladder cancer. In the propensity score-matched analysis, the 5-year bladder cancer-free survival rate was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the RP group (91.7% and 96.2%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that IMRT and the Brinkman index were the risk factors for bladder cancer in this cohort (odds ratio = 5.085, 95% confidence interval = 1.436–18.008, p = 0.012 and odds ratio = 1.001, 95% confidence interval = 1.000–1.001, p = 0.010, respectively).

Conclusions

IMRT for prostate cancer using helical tomotherapy increases the subsequent risk of bladder cancer compared with RP and is an independent risk factor for bladder cancer similar to smoking.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Our reserch data are available upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.