Volume 22, Issue 2 pp. 188-193
Original Article Clinical Investigation

Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 784 Japanese patients

Takeshi Hashimoto

Takeshi Hashimoto

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kunihiko Yoshioka

Corresponding Author

Kunihiko Yoshioka

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence: Kunihiko Yoshioka, M.D., Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1 Nishi-shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Go Nagao

Go Nagao

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yoshihiro Nakagami

Yoshihiro Nakagami

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yoshio Ohno

Yoshio Ohno

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yutaka Horiguchi

Yutaka Horiguchi

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kazunori Namiki

Kazunori Namiki

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Jun Nakashima

Jun Nakashima

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Masaaki Tachibana

Masaaki Tachibana

Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 October 2014
Citations: 21

Abstract

Objectives

To examine biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients, and to develop a risk stratification model for biochemical recurrence.

Methods

The study cohort consisted of 784 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant or adjuvant endocrine therapy. The relationships of biochemical recurrence with perioperative findings were evaluated. The prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence-free survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model analyses.

Results

During the follow-up period, 80 patients showed biochemical recurrence. The biochemical recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 92.2%, 85.2% and 80.1%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the prostate-specific antigen level, prostate-specific antigen density, biopsy Gleason score, percent positive core, pathological T stage, pathological Gleason score, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion and positive surgical margin were significantly associated with biochemical recurrence. In multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen density ≥0.4 (P = 0.0011), pathological T stage ≥3a (P = 0.002), pathological Gleason score ≥8 (P = 0.007) and positive surgical margin (P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of biochemical recurrence. The patients were stratified into three risk groups according to these factors. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 89.4% in the low-risk group, 65.6% in the intermediate-risk group and 30.3% in the high-risk group.

Conclusions

The prostate-specific antigen density, pathological T stage, pathological Gleason score and positive surgical margin were independent prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence. The risk stratification model developed using these four factors could help clinicians identify patients with a poor prognosis who might be good candidates for clinical trials of alternative management strategies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.