Volume 51, Issue 1 pp. 1-9
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Are the cut-offs of the rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody different to distinguish rheumatoid arthritis from their primary differential diagnoses?

Rita Angélica Pineda-Sic

Rita Angélica Pineda-Sic

Rheumatology Department, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
David Vega-Morales

Corresponding Author

David Vega-Morales

Rheumatology Department, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico

Correspondence

David Vega-Morales, Av. Gonzalitos No. 235 Nte. Col. Mitras Centro, Monterrey, N.L. C.P. 64460, Mexico.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Leticia Santoyo-Fexas

Leticia Santoyo-Fexas

Rheumatology Department, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
Mario Alberto Garza-Elizondo

Mario Alberto Garza-Elizondo

Rheumatology Department, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
Andrés Mendiola-Jiménez

Andrés Mendiola-Jiménez

Rheumatology Department, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
Karina Itzel González Marquez

Karina Itzel González Marquez

Rheumatology Department, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
Berenice Carrillo-Haro

Berenice Carrillo-Haro

School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 November 2023

Abstract

Objective: Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) are commonly used for diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although other rheumatic diseases with arthritis can test positive. This study aimed to determine the cutoff values for RF and anti-CCP with the best diagnostic performance in a sample of patients with RA, compared with other rheumatic diseases.

Methods: This was a descriptive, prospective study. EUROINMMUN enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for RF isotypes immunoglobulin (Ig) A (IgA), IgG and IgM and third-generation assay IgG for anti-CCP were used in serum samples of patients with RA, other rheumatic diseases and healthy subjects. The cutoff with the best diagnostic performance was determined by the Youden Index and receiver operating characteristic analysis

Results: Three hundred and thirty-two serum samples were analysed. The cutoffs proposed in our population were for RF in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects IgM 135 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were psoriatic arthritis (Psa) IgA 47.2 IU/mL, clinically suspicious arthralgia (CSA) IgA 39.5 IU/mL, primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) IgM 180.6 IU/mL, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) IgA 42.6 IU/mL, primary fibromyalgia (pFM) IgM 68.6 IU/mL, osteoarthritis (OA) IgM 48 IU/mL, gout IgM 117 IU/mL and healthy IgM 16.3 IU/mL. For anti-CCP, in RA patients versus other rheumatic diseases, and healthy subjects 6.95 IU/mL, for each disease, compared with RA, were Psa 6.8 IU/mL, CSA 9.95 IU/mL, pSS 20.7 IU/mL, SLE 6 IU /mL, pFM 11.8 IU/mL, OA 11.9 IU/mL, gout 5 IU/mL and healthy 5 IU/mL.

Conclusion: Irrespective of the manufacturer's suggested cutoff, the RA versus differential diagnosis cutoffs must be considered.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

None.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.