Volume 69, Issue 3 pp. 207-213
Scientific Research Report

Confirmation of the unidimensional structure of the Oral Health Literacy Adults Questionnaire

Priscilla M. Flynn

Corresponding Author

Priscilla M. Flynn

Department of Primary Dental Care, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Correspondence to:

Priscilla M. Flynn,

Department of Primary Dental Care,

University of Minnesota School of Dentistry,

9-372A Moos Tower,

515 Delaware Street SE,

Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Mike T. John

Mike T. John

Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Dentistry, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mohammad M. Naghibi Sistani

Mohammad M. Naghibi Sistani

Oral Health Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 December 2018
Citations: 7

Abstract

Objectives

The Oral Health Literacy Adults Questionnaire (OHL-AQ) was designed to test functional oral health literacy in general populations. Exploratory analyses suggested a unidimensional structure rather than the four constructs proposed (reading comprehension, numeracy, listening and decision-making). The purpose of this study was to conduct a confirmatory analysis of the OHL-AQ.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design used a stratified multistage sampling strategy in 22 districts of Tehran, Iran. The OHL-AQ was administered verbally in its original Persian language. Confirmatory analyses replicated the previous exploratory analyses to determine dimensionality and internal consistency. Data were then randomly assigned to two data sets and item analyses were performed to test reliability.

Results

Evidence of unidimensionality was confirmed as the exploratory factor analysis could replicate previous results in a different population. In a confirmatory factor analysis, model fit indicators were mixed because chi-square results were statistically significant and the standard root mean square residual (SRMR) neared guideline values. The comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) did not meet recommended values but the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was well within standards. Both score validity and reliability were adequate.

Conclusions

While findings overall support that OHL measured using the OHL-AQ can be considered unidimensional and therefore OHL can be characterised with one score, further dimensionality studies are needed to investigate populations in which OHL is low.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.