Collaboration and involvement of persons with lived experience in planning Canada's At Home/Chez Soi project
Corresponding Author
Geoffrey Nelson PhD
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence
Geoffrey Nelson
Department of Psychology
Wilfrid Laurier University
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3C5
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorEric Macnaughton PhD
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorSusan Eckerle Curwood PhD
Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorNathalie Egalité MA
The OMICS-ETHICS Research Group, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorJijian Voronka MA
Humanities, Social Sciences, and Social Justice Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMarie-Josée Fleury PhD
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMaritt Kirst PhD
Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorLinsay Flowers BSW
Centre for Research and Development in Education, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMichelle Patterson PhD
Centre for Applied Research in Addictions and Mental Health, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMichael Dudley MA
Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMyra Piat PhD
Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorPaula Goering PhD
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Geoffrey Nelson PhD
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence
Geoffrey Nelson
Department of Psychology
Wilfrid Laurier University
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3C5
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorEric Macnaughton PhD
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorSusan Eckerle Curwood PhD
Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorNathalie Egalité MA
The OMICS-ETHICS Research Group, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorJijian Voronka MA
Humanities, Social Sciences, and Social Justice Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMarie-Josée Fleury PhD
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMaritt Kirst PhD
Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorLinsay Flowers BSW
Centre for Research and Development in Education, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMichelle Patterson PhD
Centre for Applied Research in Addictions and Mental Health, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMichael Dudley MA
Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMyra Piat PhD
Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorPaula Goering PhD
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Planning the implementation of evidence-based mental health services entails commitment to both rigour and community relevance, which entails navigating the challenges of collaboration between professionals and community members in a planning environment which is neither ‘top-down’ nor ‘bottom-up’. This research focused on collaboration among different stakeholders (e.g. researchers, service-providers, persons with lived experience [PWLE]) at five project sites across Canada in the planning of At Home/Chez Soi, a Housing First initiative for homeless people with mental health problems. The research addressed the question of what strategies worked well or less well in achieving successful collaboration, given the opportunities and challenges within this complex ‘hybrid’ planning environment. Using qualitative methods, 131 local stakeholders participated in key informant or focus group interviews between October 2009 and February 2010. Site researchers identified themes in the data, using the constant comparative method. Strategies that enhanced collaboration included the development of a common vision, values and purpose around the Housing First approach, developing a sense of belonging and commitment among stakeholders, bridging strategies employed by Site Co-ordinators and multiple strategies to engage PWLE. At the same time, a tight timeline, initial tensions, questions and resistance regarding project and research parameters, and lack of experience in engaging PWLE challenged collaboration. In a hybrid planning environment, clear communication and specific strategies are required that flow from an understanding that the process is neither fully participatory nor expert-driven, but rather a hybrid of both.
References
- Barrera M. Jr, Castro F.G. & Steiker L.K.H. (2011) A critical analysis of approaches to the development of preventive interventions for subcultural groups. American Journal of Community Psychology 48, 439–454.
- Barwick M.A., Peters J. & Boydell K. (2009) Getting to uptake: do communities of practice support the implementation of evidence-based practice? Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 18, 16–29.
- Beresford P. & Boxall K. (2013) Where do service users’ knowledges sit in relation to professional and academic understandings of knowledge? In: P. Staddon (Ed.) Mental Health Service Users in Research: Critical Sociological Perspectives, pp. 69–86. The Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
10.1332/policypress/9781447307334.003.0006 Google Scholar
- Brown L.D. & Rogers S. (2014) The impact of mental health consumer-run organizations on transformative change. In: G. Nelson, B. Kloos & J. Ornelas (Eds) Community Psychology and Community Mental Health: Towards Transformative Change, pp. 108–129. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199362424.003.0006 Google Scholar
- Butterfoss F.D. (2007) Coalitions and Partnerships in Community Health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
- Church K. (1995) Forbidden Narratives: Critical Autobiography as Social Science. Gordon and Breach Publishers, Luxembourg.
- Church K. & Reville D. (1989) User involvement in the mental health field in Canada. Canada's Mental Health 37 (2), 22–25.
- Cornes M., Manthorpe J., Joly L. & O'Halloran S. (2014) Reconciling recovery, personalization and Housing First: integrating practice and outcome in the field of multiple exclusion homelessness. Health and Social Care in the Community 22 (2), 134–143.
- Crossley N. (2006) Contesting Psychiatry: Social Movements in Mental Health. Routledge, New York.
- DeVerteuil G. (2013) Where has NIMBY gone in urban social geography? Social and Cultural Geography 14 (6), 599–603.
- van Draanen J., Jeyaratnam J., O'Campo P., Hwang S., Harriott D., Koo M. & Stergiopoulos V. (2013) Meaningful inclusion of consumers in service delivery and research. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 36, 180–186.
- Dudley M. & Moradzadeh F. (2010) Report on Proposal Development at the Winnipeg Site: The Mental Health Commission of Canada's At Home/Chez Soi Project. Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg.
- Fleury M.-J., Vallée C., Hurtubise R. & Grenier G. (2010) Projet Chez Soi Montréal – Projet de recherche et de démonstration sur la santé mentale et l'itinérance: Rapport d’évaluation de la planification et du développement du projet (été 2008 – automne 2009) [At Home Project Montreal - Research Demonstration Projection on Mental Health and Homelessness: Report on the Evaluation of Planning and Development of the Project (Summer 2008 - Fall 2009)]. McGill University, Montréal.
- Fleury M.-J., Grenier G., Vallée C., Hurtubise R. & Lévesque P.A. (2014) The role of advocacy coalitions in a project implementation process: the example of the planning phase of the At Home/Chez Soi project dealing with homelessness in Montreal. Evaluation and Program Planning 45, 42–49.
- Foster-Fishman P.G., Berkowitz S.L., Lounsbury D.W., Jacobson S. & Allen N.A. (2001) Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: a review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology 29, 241–261.
- Gaucher C., Flowers L., Prévost N. & Tinney W. (2010) Rapport de recherche: Phase I – Planification et développement du projet Chez-soi/At Home Moncton et volet rural [Research Report: Phase I - Planning and Development of the At Home Project Moncton and Rural Arm]. Université de Moncton, Centre de recherche et de développement en éducation, Moncton.
- Goering P.N., Streiner D.L., Adair C. et al. (2011) The At Home/Chez Soi trial protocol: a pragmatic, multi-site, randomised controlled trial of a Housing First intervention for homeless individuals with mental illness in five Canadian cities. BMJ Open 1, e000323.
- Greenwood R.M., Stefancic A. & Tsemberis S. (2013) Pathways Housing First for homeless persons with psychiatric disabilities: program innovation, research, and advocacy. Journal of Social Issues 69 (4), 645–663.
- Kirst M., Plenert E.C., Harris D.W., Kirsh B., Hwang S., O'Campo P. & Stergiopoulos V. (2010) At Home/Chez Soi Project Planning and Proposal Development Toronto Site Report. Centre for Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto.
- Laverack G. & Labonté R. (2000) A planning framework for community empowerment goals within health promotion. Health Policy and Planning 15, 255–262.
- Lincoln Y.S., Lynham S.A. & Guba E.G. (2011) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In: N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4th edn, pp. 97–128. Sage, London.
- Lord J. & Church K. (1998) Beyond “partnership shock”: getting to ‘yes’, living with ‘no’. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 12, 113–121.
- MacGillivary H. & Nelson G. (1998) Partnership in mental health: what it is and how to do it. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 12, 71–83.
- Mattessich P., Murray-Close M. & Monsey B. (2001) Collaboration: What Makes It Work – A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration, 2nd edn. Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, St. Paul.
- Morrison L.J. (2005) Talking Back to Psychiatry: The Psychiatric Consumer/Survivor/Ex-Patient Movement. Routledge, New York.
- Nelson G. & Grant J. (2011) Consumer participation in mental health services. In: E.R. Vingilis & S.A. State (Eds) Applied Research and Evaluation in Community Mental Health Services: An Update of Key Research Domains, pp. 129–145. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal and Kingston.
- Nelson G., Amio J., Prilleltensky I. & Nickels P. (2000) Partnerships for implementing school and community prevention programs. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 11, 121–145.
- Nelson G., Prilleltensky I. & MacGillivary H. (2001) Building value-based partnerships: towards solidarity with oppressed groups. American Journal of Community Psychology 29, 649–677.
- Nelson G., Macnaughton E., Goering P. et al. (2013) Planning a multi-site complex intervention for people with lived experience of mental illness and homelessness: the relationships between the national team and local sites in Canada's At Home/Chez Soi project. American Journal of Community Psychology 51, 347–358.
- Nelson G., d'Ailly H., Ochocka J., Janzen R., Maiter S. & Jacobson N. (2014) Planning transformative change for mental health services for diverse cultural-linguistic communities. In: G. Nelson, B. Kloos & J. Ornelas (Eds) Community Psychology and Community Mental Health: Towards Transformative Change, pp. 177–201. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199362424.003.0009 Google Scholar
- Nowell B. & Foster-Fishman P.G. (2011) Examining multi-sector community collaboratives as vehicles for building organizational capacity. American Journal of Community Psychology 48, 193–207.
- Padgett D.K. (2012) Qualitative and Mixed Methods in Public Health. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
10.4135/9781483384511 Google Scholar
- Patterson M., Schmidt D. & Zabkiewicz D. (2010) The At Home/Chez Soi Project: A Review of the Proposal Development and Planning Phase in Vancouver. Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver.
- Prilleltensky I. (2012) Wellness as fairness. American Journal of Community Psychology 49, 1–21.
- Rattelade S. & Sylvestre J. (2012) Understanding collaboration as a dynamic process: a case study of collaboration in a supportive housing network. Currents: Scholarship in the Human Services 11, 1–20.
- Rog D.J., Marshall T., Dougherty R.H., George P., Daniels A.S., Ghose S.S. & Delphin-Rittmon M.E. (2014) Permanent supportive housing: assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services 65, 287–294.
- Russo J. & Stastny P. (2009) Beyond involvement: looking for a common perspective on roles in research. In: J. Wallcraft, B. Schrank & M. Amering (Eds) Handbook of Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research, pp. 61–72. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex.
10.1002/9780470743157.ch5 Google Scholar
- Stake R.E. (2005) Qualitative case studies. In: N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn, pp. 443–466. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
- Stanhope V. & Dunn K. (2011) The curious case of Housing First: the limits of evidence based policy. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34, 275–282.
- Stergiopoulos V., O'Campo P., Godzik A., Jeyaratnam J., Corneau S., Sarang A. & Hwang S.W. (2012) Moving from rhetoric to reality: adapting Housing First for homeless individuals with mental illness from ethno-racial groups. BMC Health Services Research 12, 345.
- Trickett E.J. & Espino S.L.R. (2004) Collaboration and social inquiry: multiple meanings of a construct and its role in creating useful and valid knowledge. American Journal of Community Psychology 34, 1–69.
- Tsemberis S. (2010) Housing First: The Pathways Model to End Homelessness for People with Mental illness and Addiction. Hazelden, Center City.
- Valentine M.B. & Capponi P. (1989) Mental health consumer participation on boards and committees: barriers and strategies. Canada's Mental Health 37 (2), 8–12.
- Voronka J., Harris D.W., Grant J., Komaroff J., Boyle D. & Kennedy A. (2014) Un/helpful help and its discontents: peer researchers paying attention to street life narratives to inform social work policy and practice. Social Work in Mental Health 12, 249–279.
10.1080/15332985.2013.875504 Google Scholar
- Warburton J., Everingham J., Cuthill M. & Bartlett H. (2008) Achieving effective collaborations to help communities age well. The Australian Journal of Public Administration 67, 470–482.
- Weinstein J. with Southwark MIND Council members (2010) User involvement in planning and developing services. In: J. Weinstein (Ed.) Mental Health, Service User Involvement, and Recovery, pp. 138–154. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Philadelphia.
- Wenger E., McDermott R. & Snyder W. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
- Williams P. (2012) Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Boundary Spanners. The Policy Press, Bristol, UK.
10.2307/j.ctt1t89g31 Google Scholar
- Wolff T. (2010) The Power of Collaborative Solutions: Six Principles and Effective Tools for Building Healthy Communities. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.