Volume 24, Issue 2 pp. 184-193
Original Article

Collaboration and involvement of persons with lived experience in planning Canada's At Home/Chez Soi project

Geoffrey Nelson PhD

Corresponding Author

Geoffrey Nelson PhD

Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence

Geoffrey Nelson

Department of Psychology

Wilfrid Laurier University

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3C5

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Macnaughton PhD

Eric Macnaughton PhD

Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Eckerle Curwood PhD

Susan Eckerle Curwood PhD

Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Nathalie Egalité MA

Nathalie Egalité MA

The OMICS-ETHICS Research Group, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Jijian Voronka MA

Jijian Voronka MA

Humanities, Social Sciences, and Social Justice Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Marie-Josée Fleury PhD

Marie-Josée Fleury PhD

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Maritt Kirst PhD

Maritt Kirst PhD

Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Linsay Flowers BSW

Linsay Flowers BSW

Centre for Research and Development in Education, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Michelle Patterson PhD

Michelle Patterson PhD

Centre for Applied Research in Addictions and Mental Health, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Dudley MA

Michael Dudley MA

Institute of Urban Studies, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Myra Piat PhD

Myra Piat PhD

Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Paula Goering PhD

Paula Goering PhD

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 February 2015
Citations: 15

Abstract

Planning the implementation of evidence-based mental health services entails commitment to both rigour and community relevance, which entails navigating the challenges of collaboration between professionals and community members in a planning environment which is neither ‘top-down’ nor ‘bottom-up’. This research focused on collaboration among different stakeholders (e.g. researchers, service-providers, persons with lived experience [PWLE]) at five project sites across Canada in the planning of At Home/Chez Soi, a Housing First initiative for homeless people with mental health problems. The research addressed the question of what strategies worked well or less well in achieving successful collaboration, given the opportunities and challenges within this complex ‘hybrid’ planning environment. Using qualitative methods, 131 local stakeholders participated in key informant or focus group interviews between October 2009 and February 2010. Site researchers identified themes in the data, using the constant comparative method. Strategies that enhanced collaboration included the development of a common vision, values and purpose around the Housing First approach, developing a sense of belonging and commitment among stakeholders, bridging strategies employed by Site Co-ordinators and multiple strategies to engage PWLE. At the same time, a tight timeline, initial tensions, questions and resistance regarding project and research parameters, and lack of experience in engaging PWLE challenged collaboration. In a hybrid planning environment, clear communication and specific strategies are required that flow from an understanding that the process is neither fully participatory nor expert-driven, but rather a hybrid of both.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.