Cervical adenocarcinoma: integration of HPV status, pattern of invasion, morphology and molecular markers into classification
Corresponding Author
Kay J Park
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Address for correspondence: K J Park, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kay J Park
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Address for correspondence: K J Park, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Cervical adenocarcinoma is a heterogenous group of tumours with various aetiologies, molecular drivers, morphologies, response to treatment and prognosis. It has become evident that human papillomavirus (HPV) infection does not drive all adenocarcinomas, and appropriate classification is critical for patient management, especially in the era of the HPV vaccine and HPV-only screening. Identified as one of the most important developments in gynaecological pathology during the past 50 years, the separation of cervical adenocarcinomas into HPV-associated (HPVA) and HPV-independent has resulted in a transformation of the classification system for cervical adenocarcinomas. HPVA has been traditionally subclassified by morphology, such as usual type (UEA), mucinous and villoglandular, etc. However, it has become evident that cell type-based histomorphological classification is not clinically meaningful, and the newly proposed International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC) is a necessary and relevant break from this prior system. Non-HPV-associated adenocarcinomas can be divided by their distinct morphology and molecular genomics with very different responses to standard therapies and potential for future targeted therapies. These include gastric-type, clear-cell, mesonephric and endometrioid adenocarcinomas. So-called ‘serous’ carcinomas of the cervix probably represent morphological variants of UEA or drop metastases from uterine or adnexal serous carcinomas, and the existence of true cervical serous carcinomas is in question. This review will discuss the advances since WHO 2014, and how HPV status, pattern of invasion as described by Silva and colleagues, histological features and molecular markers can be used to refine diagnosis and prognostication for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma.
References
- 1Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int. J. Cancer 2019; 144; 1941–1953.
- 2Stolnicu S, Barsan I, Hoang L et al. International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC): a new pathogenetic classification for invasive adenocarcinomas of the endocervix. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018; 42; 214–226.
- 3Kurman R, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH. WHO classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. Lyon: IARC Publications, 2014.
- 4Hodgson A, Olkhov-Mitsel E, Howitt BE, Nucci MR, Parra-Herran C. International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC): correlation with adverse clinicopathological features and patient outcome. J. Clin. Pathol. 2019; 72; 347–353.
- 5Stolnicu S, Hoang L, Chiu D et al. Clinical outcomes of HPV-associated and unassociated endocervical adenocarcinomas categorized by the International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC). Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019; 43; 466–474.
- 6Hodgson A, Park KJ, Djordjevic B et al. International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification: validation and interobserver reproducibility. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019; 43; 75–83.
- 7Alvarado-Cabrero I, McCluggage WG, Estevez-Castro R et al. Micropapillary cervical adenocarcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 44 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019; 43; 802–809.
- 8Park JJ, Sun D, Quade BJ et al. Stratified mucin-producing intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: adenosquamous or columnar cell neoplasia? Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2000; 24; 1414–1419.
- 9Kojima A, Mikami Y, Sudo T et al. Gastric morphology and immunophenotype predict poor outcome in mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007; 31; 664–672.
- 10Silverberg SG, Hurt WG. Minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (‘adenoma malignum’) of the cervix: a reappraisal. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1975; 121; 971–975.
- 11Pirog EC, Park KJ, Kiyokawa T et al. Gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the cervix: tumor with wide range of histologic appearances. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2019; 26; 1–12.
- 12Karamurzin YS, Kiyokawa T, Parkash V et al. Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma: an aggressive tumor with unusual metastatic patterns and poor prognosis. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015; 39; 1449–1457.
- 13Ishii K, Hosaka N, Toki T et al. A new view of the so-called adenoma malignum of the uterine cervix. Virchows Arch. 1998; 432; 315–322.
- 14Stewart CJ, Frost F, Leake R, Mohan GR, Tan J. Foamy gland changes in gastric-type endocervical neoplasia. Pathology 2015; 47; 653–658.
- 15Talia KL, McCluggage WG. The developing spectrum of gastric-type cervical glandular lesions. Pathology 2018; 50; 122–133.
- 16Carleton C, Hoang L, Sah S et al. A detailed immunohistochemical analysis of a large series of cervical and vaginal gastric-type adenocarcinomas. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016; 40; 636–644.
- 17Wada T, Ohishi Y, Kaku T et al. Endocervical adenocarcinoma with morphologic features of both usual and gastric types: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analyses and high-risk HPV detection by in situ hybridization. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017; 41; 696–705.
- 18Young RH, Welch WR, Dickersin GR, Scully RE. Ovarian sex cord tumor with annular tubules: review of 74 cases including 27 with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome and four with adenoma malignum of the cervix. Cancer 1982; 50; 1384–1402.
10.1002/1097-0142(19821001)50:7<1384::AID-CNCR2820500726>3.0.CO;2-5 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 19Hemminki A, Markie D, Tomlinson I et al. A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Nature 1998; 391; 184–187.
- 20Kuragaki C, Enomoto T, Ueno Y et al. Mutations in the STK11 gene characterize minimal deviation adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Lab. Invest. 2003; 83; 35–45.
- 21Lee JY, Dong SM, Kim HS et al. A distinct region of chromosome 19p13.3 associated with the sporadic form of adenoma malignum of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res. 1998; 58; 1140–1143.
- 22McCluggage WG, Harley I, Houghton JP, Geyer FC, MacKay A, Reis-Filho JS. Composite cervical adenocarcinoma composed of adenoma malignum and gastric type adenocarcinoma (dedifferentiated adenoma malignum) in a patient with Peutz Jeghers syndrome. J. Clin. Pathol. 2010; 63; 935–941.
- 23Murali RDFM, Weigelt B, Park KJ. Genomic characterization of gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinomas. Mod. Pathol. 2016; 29(Suppl. 2); 1.
- 24Nagaria TGS, Stockley T, Clarke B, Bernardini MQ, Rouzbahman M. Molecular landscape of gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinomas (GAS) – next generation sequencing of 14 cases. Mod. Pathol. 2018; 98; 440.
- 25Garg S, Nagaria TS, Clarke B et al. Molecular characterization of gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma using next-generation sequencing. Mod. Pathol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0305-x
- 26Herbst AL, Ulfelder H, Poskanzer DC. Adenocarcinoma of the vagina. Association of maternal stilbestrol therapy with tumor appearance in young women. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971; 284; 878–881.
- 27Herbst AL, Scully RE. Adenocarcinoma of the vagina in adolescence. A report of 7 cases including 6 clear-cell carcinomas (so-called mesonephromas). Cancer 1970; 25; 745–757.
10.1002/1097-0142(197004)25:4<745::AID-CNCR2820250402>3.0.CO;2-2 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 28Huo D, Anderson D, Palmer JR, Herbst AL. Incidence rates and risks of diethylstilbestrol-related clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix: update after 40-year follow-up. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017; 146; 566–571.
- 29Hashiguchi M, Kai K, Nishiyama S, Nakao Y, Yokoyama M, Aishima S. Clear cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix presented as a submucosal tumor arising in a background of cervical endometriosis. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2018; 37; 88–92.
- 30Boyd J, Takahashi H, Waggoner SE et al. Molecular genetic analysis of clear cell adenocarcinomas of the vagina and cervix associated and unassociated with diethylstilbestrol exposure in utero. Cancer 1996; 77; 507–513.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960201)77:3<507::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-8 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 31Nakamura K, Nakayama K, Minamoto T et al. Lynch syndrome-related clear cell carcinoma of the cervix: a case report. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018; 19; 979.
- 32Park KJ, Kiyokawa T, Soslow RA et al. Unusual endocervical adenocarcinomas: an immunohistochemical analysis with molecular detection of human papillomavirus. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2011; 35; 633–646.
- 33Pors J, Segura S, Cheng A et al. Napsin-A and AMACR are superior to HNF-1beta in distinguishing between mesonephric carcinomas and clear cell carcinomas of the gynecologic tract. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000801.
- 34Huffman JW. Mesonephric remnants in the cervix. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1948; 56; 23–40.
- 35Sneeden VD. Mesonephric lesions of the cervix; a practical means of demonstration and a suggestion of incidence. Cancer 1958; 11; 334–336.
10.1002/1097-0142(195803/04)11:2<334::AID-CNCR2820110217>3.0.CO;2-C CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 36Hart WR, Norris HJ. Mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the cervix. Cancer 1972; 29; 106–113.
10.1002/1097-0142(197201)29:1<106::AID-CNCR2820290117>3.0.CO;2-0 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 37Clement PB, Young RH, Keh P, Ostor AG, Scully RE. Malignant mesonephric neoplasms of the uterine cervix. A report of eight cases, including four with a malignant spindle cell component. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1995; 19; 1158–1171.
- 38Tambouret R, Clement PB, Young RH. Endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma with a deceptive pattern of spread to the uterine cervix: a manifestation of stage IIb endometrial carcinoma liable to be misinterpreted as an independent carcinoma or a benign lesion. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2003; 27; 1080–1088.
- 39Cavalcanti MS, Schultheis AM, Ho C et al. Mixed mesonephric adenocarcinoma and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: case description of a previously unreported entity with insights into its molecular pathogenesis. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2017; 36; 76–89.
- 40Pors J, Cheng A, Leo JM, Kinloch MA, Gilks B, Hoang L. A comparison of GATA3, TTF1, CD10, and calretinin in identifying mesonephric and mesonephric-like carcinomas of the gynecologic tract. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018; 42; 1596–1606.
- 41Mirkovic J, Sholl LM, Garcia E et al. Targeted genomic profiling reveals recurrent KRAS mutations and gain of chromosome 1q in mesonephric carcinomas of the female genital tract. Mod. Pathol. 2015; 28; 1504–1514.
- 42Kenny SL, McBride HA, Jamison J, McCluggage WG. Mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix and corpus: HPV-negative neoplasms that are commonly PAX8, CA125, and HMGA2 positive and that may be immunoreactive with TTF1 and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-beta. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2012; 36; 799–807.
- 43Silver SA, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Mezzetti TP, Tavassoli FA. Mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix: a study of 11 cases with immunohistochemical findings. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2001; 25; 379–387.
- 44Domfeh AB, Kuhn E, Park K, Parkash V. Papillary serous carcinoma of the cervix – two diseases with distinct clinico-pathologic profiles? Mod. Pathol. 2013; 26; 272A.
- 45Diaz De Vivar A, Roma AA et al. Invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma: proposal for a new pattern-based classification system with significant clinical implications: a multi-institutional study. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2013; 32; 592–601.
- 46Roma AA. Patterns of invasion of cervical adenocarcinoma as predicators of outcome. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2015; 22; 345–354.
- 47Roma AA, Diaz De Vivar A, Park KJ et al. Invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma: a new pattern-based classification system with important clinical significance. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015; 39; 667–672.
- 48Roma AA, Mistretta TA, Diaz De Vivar A et al. New pattern-based personalized risk stratification system for endocervical adenocarcinoma with important clinical implications and surgical outcome. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016; 141; 36–42.
- 49Parra-Herran C, Taljaard M, Djordjevic B et al. Pattern-based classification of invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma, depth of invasion measurement and distinction from adenocarcinoma in situ: interobserver variation among gynecologic pathologists. Mod. Pathol. 2016; 29; 879–892.
- 50Douglas G, Howitt BE, Schoolmeester JK et al. Architectural overlap between benign endocervix and pattern-A endocervical adenocarcinoma: are all pattern-A tumors invasive? Pathol. Res. Pract. 2017; 213; 799–803.
- 51Paquette C, Jeffus SK, Quick CM, Conaway MR, Stoler MH, Atkins KA. Interobserver variability in the application of a proposed histologic subclassification of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015; 39; 93–100.
- 52Spaans VM, Scheunhage DA, Barzaghi B et al. Independent validation of the prognostic significance of invasion patterns in endocervical adenocarcinoma: pattern A predicts excellent survival. Gynecol. Oncol. 2018; 151; 196–201.
- 53Roma AA, Park KJ, Xie H et al. Role of lymphovascular invasion in pattern C invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017; 41; 1205–1211.
- 54Hodgson A, Amemiya Y, Seth A, Cesari M, Djordjevic B, Parra-Herran C. Genomic abnormalities in invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma correlate with pattern of invasion: biologic and clinical implications. Mod. Pathol. 2017; 30; 1633–1641.
- 55Alvarado-Cabrero I, Roma AA, Park KJ, Rutgers JK, Silva EG. Factors predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis, relapse, and disease outcome in pattern C endocervical adenocarcinomas. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2017; 36; 476–485.
- 56Rutgers JK, Roma AA, Park KJ et al. Pattern classification of endocervical adenocarcinoma: reproducibility and review of criteria. Mod. Pathol. 2016; 29; 1083–1094.
- 57Djordjevic B, Parra-Herran C. Application of a Pattern-based classification system for invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma in cervical biopsy, cone and loop electrosurgical excision (LEEP) material: pattern on cone and LEEP is predictive of pattern in the overall tumor. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2016; 35; 456–466.
- 58Reyes C, Murali R, Park KJ. Secondary involvement of the adnexa and uterine corpus by carcinomas of the uterine cervix: a detailed morphologic description. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2015; 34; 551–563.
- 59Ronnett BM, Yemelyanova AV, Vang R et al. Endocervical adenocarcinomas with ovarian metastases: analysis of 29 cases with emphasis on minimally invasive cervical tumors and the ability of the metastases to simulate primary ovarian neoplasms. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2008; 32; 1835–1853.
- 60Stolnicu S, Barsan I, Hoang L et al. Stromal invasion pattern identifies patients at lowest risk of lymph node metastasis in HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinomas, but is irrelevant in adenocarcinomas unassociated with HPV. Gynecol. Oncol. 2018; 150; 56–60.
- 61Lou H, Villagran G, Boland JF et al. Genome analysis of Latin American cervical cancer: frequent activation of the PIK3CA pathway. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015; 21; 5360–5370.
- 62Ojesina AI, Lichtenstein L, Freeman SS et al. Landscape of genomic alterations in cervical carcinomas. Nature 2014; 506; 371–375.
- 63Tornesello ML, Annunziata C, Buonaguro L, Losito S, Greggi S, Buonaguro FM. TP53 and PIK3CA gene mutations in adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia of the cervix. J. Transl. Med. 2014; 12; 255.
- 64Wright AA, Howitt BE, Myers AP et al. Oncogenic mutations in cervical cancer: genomic differences between adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix. Cancer 2013; 119; 3776–3783.
- 65Chappell WH, Steelman LS, Long JM et al. Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTOR inhibitors: rationale and importance to inhibiting these pathways in human health. Oncotarget 2011; 2; 135–164.
- 66Fruman DA, Rommel C. PI3K and cancer: lessons, challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014; 13; 140–156.
- 67Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer. Nature 2017; 543; 378–384.