Towards the creative university: Five forms of creativity and beyond
Ronald Barnett
University College London Institute of Education, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorRonald Barnett
University College London Institute of Education, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The Creative University is susceptible to multiple interpretations which are moving in a fluid conceptual space. This conceptual openness can be adequately understood only as a set of discursive formations that reflect underlying societal changes. It is becoming a commonplace to suggest that creativity should no longer be seen as a matter of heroic individuals at work, for creativity is always a networked matter, but that reflection has to be widened to encompass a sense of underlying shifting societal forces, with the economy central stage and hence the emergence of the hybrid idea of the creative economy. Qua institution, the creative university sits uneasily between discourses of economicism and societal flourishing. The creative university, accordingly, has to be seen in this milieu, which is steering the university but which also is affording it new possibilities for creativity. Five levels of creativity are identified that serve as domains in which these forces and affordances coexist. One such level, university reflexive creativity, is singled out as the most significant of the five. The creative university, it follows, unfolds as sets of interactions between individuals, institutional structures and corporate agency. Even as the constraints multiply, so too ever-wider possibilities for the creative university may be opening.
REFERENCES
- D. Araya, & M. A. Peters (Eds.). (2010). Education in the creative economy: Knowledge and learning in the age of innovation. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
- Bakhurst, D. (2011). The formation of reason. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Barnett, R. (2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
- Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible Utopia. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
- Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Bennich-Bjorkman, L., & Rothstein, B. (1991). A creative university: Is it possible? In Studies of higher education and research (Vol. 4). Stockholm, Sweden: Council for Studies of Higher Education.
- Bhaskar, R. (1975/2008). A realist theory of science. London, UK and New York, NY: Verso.
- Boutang, Y. M. (2001). Cognitive capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Bradwell, P. (2009). The edgeless university: Why higher education must embrace technology. London, UK: Demos.
- Bull, D., & Grant, J. (2019). What's wrong with public engagement? WonkHE. Retrieved from https://wonkhe.com/blogs/whats-wrong-with-public-engagement/
- Davids, N., & Waghid, Y. (2018). Embrace the ecological university. Mail and Guardian, South Africa, 6 April.
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980/2007). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London, UK and New York, NY: Continuum.
- Elkjaer, B., & Mossfeldt Nickelsen, N. C. (2019). Exploring universities as “organisations that may learn”. In B. Lund & S. Arndt (Eds.), The creative university: Contemporary responses to the changing role of the university (pp. 119–135). Leiden, The Netherlands and Boston, MA: Brill.
- Facer, K., & Enright, B. (2019). Creating living knowledge: Connected communities programme, community-university relationships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge. London, UK: AHRC.
- Feyerabend, P. (2001). Conquest of abundance: A tale of abstraction versus the richness of being. Chicago, IL and London, UK: University of Chicago.
- R. Finnegan (Ed.). (2005). Participating in the knowledge society: Research beyond university walls. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.1057/9780230523043 Google Scholar
- Florida, R., Knudsen, B., & Stolarick, K. (2010). The university and the creative economy. In D. Araya & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Education in the creative economy: Knowledge and learning in the age of innovation (pp. 45–76). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
- Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London, UK: Tavistock.
10.3406/bude.1972.3176 Google Scholar
- Fung, D. (2017). A connected curriculum for higher education. London, UK: UCL Press.
10.14324/111.9781911576358 Google Scholar
- Gibbs, P. (2007). Trusting in the university: The contribution of temporality and trust to a praxis of higher learning. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Goddard, J. (2018). The civic university and the city. In P. Meusburger, M. Heffernan, & L. Suarsana (Eds.), Geographies and the university (pp. 355–373). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-75593-9_11 Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. (2007). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic writings (pp. 307–342). London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
- J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.). (2012). Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
10.1007/978-94-6209-128-3 Google Scholar
- Iba, T. (2010). An autopoietic systems theory for creativity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(4), 6610–6625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.071
10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.071 Google Scholar
- Irwin, A., & Michael, M. (2003). Science, social theory and public knowledge. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
- Kuhn, T. (1970/2012). The structure of scientific revolutions ( 4th ed.). Chicago, IL and London, UK: University of Chicago.
- Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
10.4159/9780674039964 Google Scholar
- List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design and status of corporate agents. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591565.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Lund, B., & Arndt, S. (2019a). What is a creative university? In B. Lund & S. Arndt (Eds.), The creative university: Contemporary responses to the changing role of the university (pp. 1–10). Leiden, The Netherlands and Boston, MA: Brill.
10.1163/9789004384149 Google Scholar
- B. Lund, & S. Arndt (Eds.). (2019b). The creative university: Contemporary responses to the changing role of the university. Leiden, The Netherlands and Boston, MA: Brill.
10.1163/9789004384149 Google Scholar
- Maxwell, N. (2014). How universities can help create a wiser world: The urgent need for an academic revolution. Exeter, UK: Imprint.
- McArthur, J. (2013). Rethinking knowledge within higher education: Adorno and social justice. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
- McCulloch-Lovell, E. (2010). The creative campus: Practicing what we teach. In D. Araya & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Education in the creative economy: Knowledge and learning in the age of innovation (pp. 525–536). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
- M. Molesworth, R. Scullion, & R. Nixon (Eds.). (2011). The marketisation of higher education and the student as consumer. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
- Montuori, A., & Donnelly, G. (2013). Creativity at the opening of 21st century. Creative Nursing, 19(2), 58–63.
- Murphy, P. (2018). The platform university: The destruction and resurrection of universities in the auto-industrial age. In R. Barnett & M. A. Peters (Eds.), The idea of the university. Vol 2: Contemporary perspectives (pp. 483–500). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
- Nixon, J. (2012). Higher education and the public good: Imagining the university. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
- Norgard, R., & Bengtsen, S. (2018). The worldhood university: Design signatures and guild thinking. In S. Bengtsen & R. Barnett (Eds.), The thinking university: A philosophical examination of thought and higher education (pp. 167–184). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-77667-5_12 Google Scholar
- Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
- Nussbaum, M. (2002). Education for citizenship in an era of global connection. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 21(4–5), 289–303.
10.1023/A:1019837105053 Google Scholar
- Peters, M. A., & Araya, D. (2010). The creative economy: Origins, categories and concepts. In D. Araya & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Education in the creative economy: Knowledge and learning in the age of innovation (pp. Xiii–XXX). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
- Reichart, S. (2019). The role of universities in regional innovation ecosystems. Brussels, Belgium: European University Association.
- Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning spaces: Creating opportunities for knowledge creation in academic life. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
- Stratford, R. (2015). What is the ecological university and why is it a significant challenge for higher education policy and practice? Educational Philosophy and Theory.
- Watson, D., Hollister, R. M., Stroud, S. E., & Babcock, E. (2011). The engaged university: International perspectives on civic engagement. New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203818763 Google Scholar
- Weber, S. (2013). Imagining the creative university: Dispositives of creation, strategies of innovation, politics of reality. In M. A. Peters & T. Besley (Eds.), The creative university (pp. 161–192). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Sense.
10.1007/978-94-6209-245-7_13 Google Scholar
- Weller, S. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible utopia. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(1), 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1554740
- Williams, B. (1985/2008). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
- Wright, S., & Greenwood, D. (2017). Universities run for, by, and with the faculty, students and staff: Alternatives to the neoliberal destruction of higher education. Learning and Teaching: The International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences, 10(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2017.100104
- Zizek, S. (2009). The parallax view. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT.