Volume 23, Issue 3 pp. 288-296
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of characteristics of centers practicing incremental vs. conventional approaches to hemodialysis delivery – postdialysis recovery time and patient survival

Andrew Davenport

Corresponding Author

Andrew Davenport

UCL Department of Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to: Andrew Davenport, UCL Department of Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Ayman Guirguis

Ayman Guirguis

Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, UK

Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, East & North Herts NHS Trust, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, UK

Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Almond

Michael Almond

Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Clara Day

Clara Day

Department of Renal Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph Chilcot

Joseph Chilcot

Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
David Wellsted

David Wellsted

Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Ken Farrington

Ken Farrington

Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, UK

Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, East & North Herts NHS Trust, Coreys Mill Lane, Stevenage, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 March 2019
Citations: 19
Conflict of interests: None of the authors have any conflict of interests.
Disclosure of grants or other funding: National Institute for Health Research Program, Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0110-21073).

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional haemodialysis (HD) involves treatment times of around 4 hours thrice weekly, taking no account of residual kidney function (RKF). In incremental HD the frequency and duration of dialysis sessions are individualized according to RKF. There are no studies comparing these approaches. We utilized data from a recent multicenter study to compare patient characteristics and outcomes between a center practicing incremental HD and others using a conventional approach.

Methods: Seven hundred and nine patients attending for routine outpatient HD in five UK centers were studied. One center practiced incremental dialysis (n = 254) and four conventional HD (n = 455). Data collected included demographics, comorbidity, dialysis parameters, routine biochemistry and hematology, recovery time postdialysis, and Beck Depression Inventory-II score (BDI-II). Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months.

Findings: Pre- and postdialysis BP, serum calcium and phosphate were higher in the incremental center, whilst sessional Kt/Vurea was lower (all P < 0.001), as was the proportion of patients with a mean postdialysis BP <100 mmHg (P = 0.011). Patients recovered from their HD session more quickly in the incremental center, with significantly more patients reporting recovery within 1 and 4 hours Short-term survival was significantly better in the incremental center both unadjusted and adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, dialysis vintage, anuria, history of cancer, heart disease, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, serum albumin, BDI-II score, and sessional Kt/V.

Discussion: The association between incremental dialysis, shorter postdialysis recovery times and improved short-term survival may be related to reduced haemodynamic stress as a consequence of less intensive ultrafiltration and reduced length of dialysis sessions. Prospective studies are required to test this hypothesis.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.