Volume 27, Issue 2 pp. 261-269
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

How to implement medical and patient associations in low-income countries: A proposition from the African French Alliance for the Treatment of Haemophilia (AFATH)

Thomas Sannié

Corresponding Author

Thomas Sannié

Thomas Sannié, Association Française des Hémophiles, Paris, France

Correspondence

Thomas Sannié, Association Française des Hémophiles, 6 rue Alexandre Cabanel, 75015 Paris, France

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Philippe de Moerloose

Philippe de Moerloose

Philippe de Moerloose, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
AFATH
First published: 23 February 2021
Citations: 2

AFATH members are explained in Appendix.

Abstract

Introduction

There is a lack of joint recommendations by healthcare professionals (HCP) and patient organizations when a partnership between high and low-income countries in the field of haemophilia is planned.

Aim

To draft recommendations to clarify the methodology when a partnership between low- and high-income countries is planned with the objective of a long-term implication. This methodology is to be implemented for fulfilling both medical and associative aims.

Methods

Based on the available literature, a first document was written, then diffused to AFATH (Alliance Franco-Africaine pour le Traitement de l’Hémophilie) members, and after a one-day meeting and further amendments, a second draft was approved by all members before submission for publication.

Results

Based on 6 years experience, several recommendations regarding the joint and separate roles of patient association and HCP for a first mission in French-speaking sub-Saharan African countries have been established. The proposed methodology for establishing preliminary contacts, the first visit and the key points for diagnostic action, medical follow-up, patient education and advocacy strategy outlines a model of partnership between patients and HCP.

Conclusion

This paper written jointly by patients and physicians underlines the importance of reciprocal expert guidance and a partnership based on complementary inputs.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest in relation to this manuscript.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.