Citizen satisfaction under changing political leadership: The role of partisan motivated reasoning
Abstract
There exists a gap in our understanding of what citizen satisfaction evaluations actually represent. While recent years have witnessed a move away from performance-based models to cognitive-implicit models of citizen satisfaction, the inherent political nature of government, its institutions, and services has been largely ignored. Drawing on the functional responsibility chain between political principals and governmental, public-service-delivering institutions, we outline a theory of citizen satisfaction that accounts for the political nature of these institutions. In the context of two consecutive general elections, we find a partisan bias in citizen satisfaction with government and the legislative branch, but not for institutions that are more clearly separated from national government. These mixed findings are suggestive of a dispersion effect of the partisan bias in citizen satisfaction, namely, that citizens are less likely to use their partisan lenses in cases where the responsibility of political principals is dispersed across multiple actors.
REFERENCES
- Andersen, S. C., & Hjortskov, M. (2016). Cognitive biases in performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 647–662.
- Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2007). Losers' consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Anduiza, E., Gallego, A., & Munoz, J. (2013). Turning a blind eye: Experimental evidence of partisan bias in attitudes toward corruption. Comparative Political Studies, 46(12), 1664–1692.
-
Angrist, J. D., &
Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400829828 Google Scholar
- Arceneaux, K. (2006). The federal face of voting: Are elected officials held accountable for the functions relevant to their office? Political Psychology, 27(5), 731–754.
- Arceneaux, K., & Vander, R. J. (2013). The effects of need for cognition and need for affect on partisan evaluations. Political Psychology, 34(1), 23–42.
- Bækgaard, M., & Serritzlew, S. (2016). Interpreting performance information: Motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 73–82.
- Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.
-
Baumeister, R. F.,
Bratslavsky, E.,
Finkenauer, C., &
Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323 Google Scholar
- Boyne, G., James, O., John, P., & Petrovsky, N. (2009). Democracy and government performance: Holding incumbents accountable in english local governments. Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1273–1284.
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
- Charbonneau, É., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2012). Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City schools. American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 54–65.
- Dahlberg, S., & Linde, J. (2015). The winner-loser gap in satisfaction with democracy over time: Evidence from a Swedish citizen panel. Quality of Government Working Paper Series, 2015, 1.
- Essaisson, P. (2011). Electoral losers revisited—How citizens react the defeat at the ballot box. Electoral Studies, 30, 102–113.
- Favero, N., & Meier, K. J. (2013). Evaluating urban public schools: Parents, teachers, and state assessments. Public Administration Review, 73(3), 401–412.
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. E. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 58, 203–210.
- Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Some facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq. Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–974.
- Gerber, A. S., & Huber, G. A. (2009). Partisanship and economic behavior. Do partisan differences in economic forecasts predict real economic behavior? American Political Science Review, 103(3), 407–426.
- Goren, P. (2002). Character weakness, partisan bias, and presidential evaluation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 627–641.
- Goren, P., Federico, C. M., & Kittilson, M. C. (2009). Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 805–820.
- Hamilton, V. L. (1978). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41(4), 316–328.
- Hansen, K. M., Olsen, A. L., & Bech, M. (2015). Cross-national yardstick comparisons: A choice experiment on a forgotten voter heuristic. Political Behavior, 37(4), 767–789.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013). Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 285–306.
- Hjortskov, M. (2016). Citizen satisfaction: Political voice and cognitive biases (PhD thesis). Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Hobolt, S. B., Tilley, J., & Wittrock, J. (2013). Listening to the government: How information shapes responsibility attributions. Political Behavior, 35, 153–174.
- Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- James, O. (2009). Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 107–123.
- James, O. (2011). Managing citizens' expectations of public service performance: Evidence from observation and experimentation in local government. Public Administration, 89(4), 1419–1435.
-
James, O., &
Jilke, S. (2017). Citizen and users' reponses to public service failure: Experimentation about blame, exit and voice. In O. James, S. Jilke, & G. G. Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions (pp. 361–375). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/9781316676912.018 Google Scholar
- James, O., Jilke, S., Petersen, C., & Van de Walle, S. (2016). Citizens' blame of politicians for public service failure: experimental evidence about blame reduction through delegation and contracting. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 83–93.
- James, O., & John, P. (2007). Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent English local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567–580.
- James, O., & Moseley, A. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens' perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behavior? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92(2), 493–511.
- James, O., & Van Ryzin, G. (2017). Motivated reasoning about public performance: An experimental study of how citizens judge the affordable care act. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 197–209.
- Jilke, S. (2016). Job satisfaction and regime change: Evidence from a natural experiment. International Public Management Journal, 19(3), 370–396.
- Jilke, S., Petrovsky, N., Meuleman, B., & James, O. (2017). Measurement equivalence in replications of experiments: When and why it matters and guidance on how to determine equivalence. Public Management Review, 19(9), 1293–1310.
- Kahan, D. M. (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgement and Decision Making, 8(4), 407–424.
- Karp, J., & Brockington, D. (2005). Social desirability and response validity: A comparative analysis of overreporting voter turnout in five countries. Journal of Politics, 67(3), 825–840.
-
Key, V. O., Jr. (1966). The responsible electorate: Rationality in presidential voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/harvard.9780674497764 Google Scholar
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–198.
-
Lodge, C. S., &
Taber, M. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139032490 Google Scholar
- Malhotra, N., & Kuo, A. G. (2008). Attributing blame: The public's response to hurricane Katrina. Journal of Politics, 70(1), 120–135.
- Marvel, J. D. (2014). The Boston marathon bombings: Who's to blame and why it matters for public administration. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 713–725.
- Marvel, J. D. (2015). Public opinion and public sector performance: Are individuals' beliefs about performance evidence-based or the product of anti-public sector bias? International Public Management Journal, 18(2), 209–227.
- Marvel, J. D. (2016). Unconscious bias in citizens' evaluations of public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 143–158.
- Marvel, J. D., & Girth, A. M. (2016). Citizen attributions of blame in third-party governance. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 96–108.
- McGraw, K. M. (1990). Avoiding blame: An experimental investigation of political excuses and justifications. British Journal of Political Science, 20(1): 119–142.
-
McGraw, K. M. (2001). Political accounts and attribution processes. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 160–197). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511896941.009 Google Scholar
-
Mok, J. Y.,
James, O., &
Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Expectations and satisfaction with public services. In O. James, S. Jilke, & G. G. Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions, pp. 345–360. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/9781316676912.017 Google Scholar
- Mortensen, P. B. (2012). “It's the central government's fault”: Elected regional officials' use of blame-shifting rhetoric. Governance, 25, 439–461.
- Nielsen, P. A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2017). How do politicians attribute bureaucratic responsibility for government performance? Negativity bias and interest group advocacy. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 27(2), 269–283.
- Olsen, A. L. (2015). Negative performance information causes asymmetrical evaluations and elicits strong responsibility attributions. Working Paper.
- Overman, S. (2017). Autonomous agencies, happy citizens? Challenging the satisfaction claim. Governance, 30(2), 211–227.
- Petrovsky, N., Mok, J. Y., & Leon-Cazares, F. (2016). Citizen expectations and satisfaction in a young democracy: A test of the expectancy-disconfirmation model. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 395–407.
-
Pierce, L.,
Rogers, T., &
Snyder, J. A. (2016). Losing hurts: The happiness impact of partisan electoral loss. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3(1), 44–59.
10.1017/XPS.2015.8 Google Scholar
- Powell, G. B., & Whitten, G. D. (1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 391–414.
- Roch, C. H., & Poister, T. H. (2006). Citizens, accountability, and services satisfaction: The influence of expectations. Urban Affairs Review, 41(3), 292–308.
- Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320.
- Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news, bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 372–385.
-
Swindell, D., &
Kelly, J. M. (2000). Linking citizen satisfaction data to performance measures: A preliminary evaluation. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(1), 30–52.
10.2307/3381075 Google Scholar
- Tilley, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2011). Is the government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility. Journal of Politics, 73(2), 316–330.
- Van Ryzin, G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–448.
- Van Ryzin, G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy-disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597–614.
- Van Ryzin, G. G., Immerwahr, S., & Altmann, S. (2008). Measuring street cleanliness: A comparison of New York city's scorecard and results from a citizen survey. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 295–303.
-
Weaver, R. K. (1986). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy, 6(4), 371–398.
10.1017/S0143814X00004219 Google Scholar
- Weaver, K. (1987). The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Politics, 6(4), 371–398.