Volume 17, Issue 10 pp. 1358-1377
REVIEW ARTICLE

Identifying frailty in primary care: A systematic review

Linda Lee

Corresponding Author

Linda Lee

Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Schlegel-University of Waterloo Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Correspondence: Dr Linda Lee MD, MClSc(FM), CCFP, FCFP, Centre for Family Medicine, 10B Victoria Street South, Kitchener, ON, Canada, N2G 1C5. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Tejal Patel

Tejal Patel

Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

University of Waterloo School of Pharmacy, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Loretta M. Hillier

Loretta M. Hillier

St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada

Aging, Rehabilitation and Geriatric Care Research Center of the Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Niraj Maulkhan

Niraj Maulkhan

Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Karen Slonim

Karen Slonim

Center for Family Medicine Family Health Team, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Costa

Andrew Costa

Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 April 2017
Citations: 45

Abstract

Aim

Identification of frailty in the primary care setting could be improved with the availability of easily identifiable markers of frailty. The purpose of this article was to systematically review markers for frailty or risk tools that have been validated in the ambulatory care setting.

Methods

Medline, PubMed, CIHAHL and Embase databases were searched up to March 2016 for studies on frailty markers in community-dwelling individuals 65 years or older. Studies were included for review if they were carried out in primary care or outpatient settings, used a validated definition of frailty, compared two or more markers, and used randomized controlled trial, quasi-experimental or prospective cohort designs.

Results

Of the 3405 titles screened, 12 were retained for review. All of the studies were prospective cohort designs. Studies most frequently assessed biological markers, such as immune, inflammation, endocrine biomarkers and metabolic syndrome markers. Not one specific marker was repeatedly identified as a definitive marker for frailty.

Conclusions

There is a lack of psychometrically sound and clinically useful frailty markers. There is a need for further research to identify highly sensitive, specific and accurate markers that are feasible to use in the context of busy primary care practice. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 1358–1377.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.