Volume 25, Issue 2 pp. 744-752
PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access

Microplastic ingestion ubiquitous in marine turtles

Emily M. Duncan

Emily M. Duncan

Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK

College of Life and Environmental Sciences: Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Marine Ecology and Biodiversity, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Annette C. Broderick

Annette C. Broderick

Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Wayne J. Fuller

Wayne J. Fuller

Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Near East University, Nicosia, North Cyprus, Turkey

Society for Protection of Turtles, Kyrenia, North Cyprus, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Tamara S. Galloway

Tamara S. Galloway

College of Life and Environmental Sciences: Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew H. Godfrey

Matthew H. Godfrey

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, Beaufort, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Hamann

Mark Hamann

College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Colin J. Limpus

Colin J. Limpus

Department of Environment and Science, Threatened Species Unit, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Penelope K. Lindeque

Penelope K. Lindeque

Marine Ecology and Biodiversity, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew G. Mayes

Andrew G. Mayes

School of Chemistry, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Lucy C. M. Omeyer

Lucy C. M. Omeyer

Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK

Search for more papers by this author
David Santillo

David Santillo

Greenpeace Research Laboratories, School of Biosciences, Innovation Centre Phase 2, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Robin T. E. Snape

Robin T. E. Snape

Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK

Society for Protection of Turtles, Kyrenia, North Cyprus, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Brendan J. Godley

Corresponding Author

Brendan J. Godley

Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK

Correspondence

Brendan J. Godley, Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 December 2018
Citations: 245

Abstract

Despite concerns regarding the environmental impacts of microplastics, knowledge of the incidence and levels of synthetic particles in large marine vertebrates is lacking. Here, we utilize an optimized enzymatic digestion methodology, previously developed for zooplankton, to explore whether synthetic particles could be isolated from marine turtle ingesta. We report the presence of synthetic particles in every turtle subjected to investigation (n = 102) which included individuals from all seven species of marine turtle, sampled from three ocean basins (Atlantic [ATL]: n = 30, four species; Mediterranean (MED): n = 56, two species; Pacific (PAC): n = 16, five species). Most particles (n = 811) were fibres (ATL: 77.1% MED: 85.3% PAC: 64.8%) with blue and black being the dominant colours. In lesser quantities were fragments (ATL: 22.9%: MED: 14.7% PAC: 20.2%) and microbeads (4.8%; PAC only; to our knowledge the first isolation of microbeads from marine megavertebrates). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) of a subsample of particles (n = 169) showed a range of synthetic materials such as elastomers (MED: 61.2%; PAC: 3.4%), thermoplastics (ATL: 36.8%: MED: 20.7% PAC: 27.7%) and synthetic regenerated cellulosic fibres (SRCF; ATL: 63.2%: MED: 5.8% PAC: 68.9%). Synthetic particles being isolated from species occupying different trophic levels suggest the possibility of multiple ingestion pathways. These include exposure from polluted seawater and sediments and/or additional trophic transfer from contaminated prey/forage items. We assess the likelihood that microplastic ingestion presents a significant conservation problem at current levels compared to other anthropogenic threats.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.