A physics-informed generative adversarial network framework for multiaxial fatigue life prediction
Corresponding Author
GaoYuan He
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Correspondence
GaoYuan He and YongXiang Zhao, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Email: [email protected] & [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
YongXiang Zhao
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Correspondence
GaoYuan He and YongXiang Zhao, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Email: [email protected] & [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorChuLiang Yan
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Beijing Aircraft Strength Institution, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
GaoYuan He
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Correspondence
GaoYuan He and YongXiang Zhao, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Email: [email protected] & [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
YongXiang Zhao
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Correspondence
GaoYuan He and YongXiang Zhao, School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China.
Email: [email protected] & [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorChuLiang Yan
School of Mechanical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Beijing Aircraft Strength Institution, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Deep learning has achieved great success in multiaxial fatigue life prediction. However, when data-driven models are used to describe data from physical processes, the relationship between inputs and outputs is agnostic. This paper proposes a deep learning framework combining generative adversarial networks and physical models to predict multiaxial fatigue life. This framework incorporates three life prediction equations in the loss function of generator, respectively. The results show that models with suitable physical constraints outperform neural networks in predicting results. Introducing the Smith–Watson–Topper model as a physical loss degrades the predictive performance of the physics-informed network. On the contrary, introducing Fatemi–Socie and Shang–Wang model as physical loss improves the predictive performance of physics-informed network. Learning using physics knowledge can lead to the ability of model to generate data that satisfy the governing equations of physics.
Highlights
- A physics-informed GAN integrating fatigue life prediction model is proposed.
- The physics-informed GAN can learn the knowledge of physical equations.
- Different physical loss weights affect the training process of PIGAN.
- The integrated prediction model affects the performance of physics-informed GAN.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1Nieslony A. Determination of fragments of multiaxial service loading strongly influencing the fatigue of machine components. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2009; 23(8): 2712-2721.
- 2Livieri P, Lazzarin P. Fatigue strength of steel and aluminium welded joints based on generalised stress intensity factors and local strain energy values. Int J Fract. 2005; 133(3): 247-276.
- 3Pitoiset X, Preumont A. Spectral methods for multiaxial random fatigue analysis of metallic structures. Int J Fatigue. 2000; 22(7): 541-550.
- 4Liu Y, Kang G, Gao Q. A multiaxial stress-based fatigue failure model considering ratchetting-fatigue interaction. Int J Fatigue. 2010; 32(4): 678-684.
- 5Liu Y, Mahadevan S. Strain-based multiaxial fatigue damage modelling. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2005; 28(12): 1177-1189.
- 6Palin-Luc T, Lasserre S. An energy based criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue. Eur J Mech a Solids. 1998; 17(2): 237-251.
- 7Kruch S, Prigent P, Chaboche JL. A fracture mechanics based fatigue-creep-environment crack growth model for high temperature. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 1994; 59(1-3): 141-148.
- 8Cruces AS, Garcia-Gonzalez A, Moreno B, Itoh T, Lopez-Crespo P. Critical plane based method for multiaxial fatigue analysis of 316 stainless steel. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2022; 118:103273.
- 9Chen X, Xu S, Huang D. A critical plane-strain energy density criterion for multiaxial low-cycle fatigue life under non-proportional loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1999; 22(8): 679-686.
- 10Liao D, Zhu SP, Qian G. Multiaxial fatigue analysis of notched components using combined critical plane and critical distance approach. Int J Mech Sci. 2019; 160: 38-50.
- 11Lazzarin P, Livieri P, Berto F, Zappalorto M. Local strain energy density and fatigue strength of welded joints under uniaxial and multiaxial loading. Eng Fract Mech. 2008; 75(7): 1875-1889.
- 12Zhu SP, Yu ZY, Liu Q, Ince A. Strain energy-based multiaxial fatigue life prediction under normal/shear stress interaction. Int J Damage Mech. 2019; 28(5): 708-739.
- 13Walat K, Kurek M, Ogonowski P, Lagoda T. The multiaxial random fatigue criteria based on strain and energy damage parameters on the critical plane for the low-cycle range. Int J Fatigue. 2012; 37: 100-111.
- 14Kandil FA, Brown MW, Miller KJ. Biaxial low-Cycle Fatigue Fracture of 316 Stainless Steel at Elevated Temperature. The Metal Society Press; 1982: 203-210.
- 15Fatemi A, Socie DF. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 1988; 11(3): 149-165.
- 16Smith KN, Waston P, Topper TH. A stress–strain function for the fatigue of metals. J Mech des. 1970; 15(4): 767-778.
- 17Shang DG, Wang DJ. A new multiaxial fatigue damage model based on the critical plane approach. Int J Fatigue. 1998; 20(3): 241-245.
- 18He GY, Zhao YX, Yan CL. Parameter estimation in multiaxial fatigue short crack growth model using hierarchical Bayesian linear regression. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2023; 46(3): 845-865.
- 19Gulgec NS, Takac M, Pakzad SN. Structural sensing with deep learning: strain estimation from acceleration data for fatigue assessment. Comput-Aided Civ Inf. 2020; 35(12): 1349-1364.
- 20Li XQ, Song LK, Bai GC. Deep learning regression-based stratified probabilistic combined cycle fatigue damage evaluation for turbine bladed disks. Int J Fatigue. 2022; 159:106812.
- 21Maleki E, Unal O, Guagliano M, Bagherifard S. Analysing the fatigue behaviour and residual stress relaxation of gradient nano-structured 316L steel subjected to the shot peening via deep learning approach. Met Mater Int. 2022; 28(1): 112-131.
- 22Tao C, Zhang C, Ji H, Qiu J. Fatigue damage characterization for composite laminates using deep learning and laser ultrasonic. Compos Part B Eng. 2021; 216:108816.
- 23Zhang XC, Gong JG, Xuan FZ. A deep learning based life prediction method for components under creep, fatigue and creep-fatigue conditions. Int J Fatigue. 2021; 148:106236.
- 24Pałczynski K, Skibicki D, Pejkowski Ł, Andrysiak T. Application of machine learning methods in multiaxial fatigue life prediction. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2023; 46(2): 416-432.
- 25Gan L, Wu H, Zhong Z. Fatigue life prediction in presence of mean stresses using domain knowledge-integrated ensemble of extreme learning machines. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2022; 45(9): 2748-2766.
- 26Zhou K, Sun X, Shi S, Song K, Chen X. Machine learning-based genetic feature identification and fatigue life prediction. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2021; 44(9): 2524-2537.
- 27Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J Comput Phys. 2019; 378: 686-707.
- 28Cai S, Li H, Zheng F, et al. Artificial intelligence velocimetry and microaneurysm-on-a-chip for three-dimensional analysis of blood flow in physiology and disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(13):e2100697118.
- 29Cai S, Mao Z, Wang Z, Yin M, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: a review. Acta Mech Sin. 2021; 37(12): 1727-1738.
- 30Raissi M, Yazdani A, Karniadakis GE. Hidden fluid mechanics: learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations. Science. 2020; 367(6481): 1026-1030.
- 31Hu X, Hu H, Verma S, Zhang Z. Physics-guided deep neural networks for power flow analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2021; 36(3): 2082-2092.
- 32Park J, Park J. Physics-induced graph neural network: an application to wind-farm power estimation. Energy. 2019; 187(15):115883.
10.1016/j.energy.2019.115883 Google Scholar
- 33Zamzam AS, Sidiropoulos ND. Physics-aware neural networks for distribution system state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2020; 35(6): 4347-4356.
- 34Rao C, Sun H, Liu Y. Physics-informed deep learning for computational elastodynamics without labeled data. J Eng Mech. 2021; 147(8):04021043.
- 35Samaniego E, Anitescu C, Goswami S, et al. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: concepts, implementation and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2020; 362:112790.
- 36Shukla K, Di Leoni PC, Blackshire J, Sparkman D, Karniadakis GE. Physics-informed neural network for ultrasound nondestructive quantification of surface breaking cracks. J Nondestruct Eval. 2020; 39(3): 61.
- 37Yin M, Zheng X, Humphrey JD, Karniadakis GE. Non-invasive inference of thrombus material properties with physics-informed neural networks. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2021; 375:113603.
- 38Chen D, Li Y, Liu K, Li Y. A physics-informed neural network approach to fatigue life prediction using small quantity of samples. Int J Fatigue. 2023; 166:107270.
- 39Li X, Zhang W. Physics-informed deep learning model in wind turbine response prediction. Renew Energy. 2022; 185: 932-944.
- 40Zhou T, Jiang S, Han T, Zhu S-P, Cai Y. A physically consistent framework for fatigue life prediction using probabilistic physics-informed neural network. Int J Fatigue. 2023; 166: 107234.
- 41Li XQ, Song LK, Bai GC, Li DG. Physics-informed distributed modeling for CCF reliability evaluation of aeroengine rotor systems. Int J Fatigue. 2023; 167: 107342.
- 42Yucesan YA, Viana FAC. A hybrid physics-informed neural network for main bearing fatigue prognosis under grease quality variation. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2022; 171: 108875.
- 43Zhang XC, Gong JG, Xuan FZ. A physics-informed neural network for creep-fatigue life prediction of components at elevated temperatures. Eng Fract Mech. 2021; 258:108130.
- 44Viana FAC, Nascimento RG, Dourado A, Yucesan YA. Estimating model inadequacy in ordinary differential equations with physics-informed neural networks. Comput Struct. 2021; 245:106458.
- 45Nascimento RG, Fricke K, Viana FAC. A tutorial on solving ordinary differential equations using Python and hybrid physics-informed neural network. Eng Appl Artif Intel. 2020; 96:103996.
- 46He GY, Zhao YX, Yan CL. MFLP-PINN: a physics-informed neural network for multiaxial fatigue life prediction. Eur J Mech A Solids. 2023; 98:104889.
- 47Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial networks. Commun ACM. 2020; 63(11): 139-144.
- 48Creswell A, White T, Dumoulin V, Arulkumaran K, Sengupta B, Bharath AA. Generative adversarial networks: an overview. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2018; 35(1): 53-65.
- 49Wolterink JM, Leiner T, Viergever MA, Isgum I. Generative adversarial networks for noise reduction in low-dose CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017; 36(12): 2536-2545.
- 50Yang Q, Yan P, Zhang Y, et al. Low-dose CT image denoising using a generative adversarial network with Wasserstein distance and perceptual loss. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018; 37(6): 1348-1357.
- 51He GY, Zhao YX, Yan CL. Application of tabular data synthesis using generative adversarial networks on machine learning-based multiaxial fatigue life prediction. Int J Press Vessel Pip. 2022; 199:104779.
- 52Sun X, Zhou K, Shi S, Song K, Chen X. A new cyclical generative adversarial network based data augmentation method for multiaxial fatigue life prediction. Int J Fatigue. 2022; 162:106996.
- 53Skibicki D, Pejkowski L. Low-cycle multiaxial fatigue behaviour and fatigue life prediction for CuZn37 brass using the stress-strain models. Int J Fatigue. 2017; 102: 18-36.
- 54Yu Q, Zhang J, Jiang Y, Li Q. Multiaxial fatigue of extruded AZ61A magnesium alloy. Int J Fatigue. 2011; 33(3): 437-447.
- 55Wu ZR, Hu XT, Song YD. Multiaxial fatigue life prediction for titanium alloy TC4 under proportional and nonproportional loading. Int J Fatigue. 2014; 59: 170-175.