Measuring environmental sustainability performance of freight transportation seaports in China: A data envelopment analysis approach based on the closest targets
Xingchen Li
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Department of Consumer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Feng Li
School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China
Correspondence
Feng Li, School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorNenggui Zhao
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Search for more papers by this authorQingyuan Zhu
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois
Search for more papers by this authorXingchen Li
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Department of Consumer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Feng Li
School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China
Correspondence
Feng Li, School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorNenggui Zhao
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Search for more papers by this authorQingyuan Zhu
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui Province, China
Department of Business Administration, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Because of China's rapid economic development, its freight transportation system has grown to become one of China's high-pollution-emission sectors. However, there are few studies that pay close attention to measuring and improving the environmental performance of China's freight transportation system, especially in regard to seaports. In this paper, data envelopment analysis (DEA) is applied to measure the environmental performance of freight transportation seaports. In addition, we also provide benchmarking information to point the way to improving environmental performance effectively. Our proposed DEA model is based on the closest targets, which satisfies the strong monotonicity and can yield the most relevant solution for the inefficient seaports. An empirical study of 21 of China's primary freight transportation seaports shows that most of them have relatively good environmental performance. Among the five coastal port groups, the Bohai-rim port group had the best environmental performance, whereas the Pearl River port group had the worst. Our data show significant differences between the best and worst performances, indicating that more measures should be taken to balance and coordinate the development between the five coastal port groups.
REFERENCES
- Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2010). A Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Optimization, 59(7), 985–996.
- Ando, K., Kai, A., Maeda, Y., & Sekitani, K. (2012). Least distance based inefficiency measures on the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 55(1), 73–91.
10.15807/jorsj.55.73 Google Scholar
- Aparicio, J., Borras, F., Ortiz, L., & Pastor, J. T. (2014). Benchmarking in healthcare: An approach based on closest targets. ( pp. 67–91). Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Managing service productivity.
- Aparicio, J., & Pastor, J. T. (2013). A well-defined efficiency measure for dealing with closest targets in DEA. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(17), 9142–9154.
- Aparicio, J., & Pastor, J. T. (2014). Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA. Omega, 44, 51–57.
- Aparicio, J., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2007). Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(3), 209–218.
- Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
- Barros, C. P., & Athanassiou, M. (2004). Efficiency in European seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 6(2), 122–140.
10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100099 Google Scholar
- Chang, Y. T. (2013). Environmental efficiency of ports: A data envelopment analysis approach. Maritime Policy & Management, 40, 467–478.
- Chang, Y. T., Park, H. K., Lee, S., & Kim, E. (2018). Have Emission Control Areas (ECAs) harmed port efficiency in Europe? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 58, 39–53.
- Chang, Y. T., Zhang, N., Danao, D., & Zhang, N. (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy, 58, 277–283.
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
- Chen, C. M., & Delmas, M. A. (2012). Measuring eco-inefficiency: A new frontier approach. Operations Research, 60(5), 1064–1079.
- Chin, A. T., & Low, J. M. (2010). Port performance in Asia: Does production efficiency imply environmental efficiency? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(8), 483–488.
- Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G.E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Cook, W. D., & Seiford, L. M. (2009). Data envelopment analysis (DEA)—Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 1–17.
- Cullinane, K., & Wang, T. (2010). The efficiency analysis of container port production using DEA panel data approaches. OR Spectrum, 32(3), 717–738.
- Cullinane, K., Wang, T. F., Song, D. W., & Ji, P. (2004). An application of DEA windows analysis to container port production. Review of Network Economics, 3(2), 184–206.
10.2202/1446-9022.1050 Google Scholar
- Cullinane, K., Wang, T. F., Song, D. W., & Ji, P. (2005). The application of mathematical programming approaches to estimating container port production efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24(1), 73–92.
- Du, J., Liang, L., Yang, F., Bi, G. B., & Yu, X. B. (2010). A new DEA-based method for fully ranking all decision-making units. Expert Systems, 27(5), 363–373.
- Frei, F. X., & Harker, P. T. (1999). Projections onto efficient frontiers: Theoretical and computational extensions to DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(3), 275–300.
- Fukuyama, H., Maeda, Y., Sekitani, K., & Shi, J. (2014). Input–output substitutability and strongly monotonic p-norm least distance DEA measures. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(3), 997–1007.
- Fukuyama, H., & Sekitani, K. (2012). An efficiency measure satisfying the Dmitruk–Koshevoy criteria on DEA technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(2), 131–143.
- González, E., & Álvarez, A. (2001). From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(3), 512–520.
- Hung, S. W., Lu, W. M., & Wang, T. P. (2010). Benchmarking the operating efficiency of Asia container ports. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 706–713.
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2011). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights. Cancún, Mexico.
- Itoh, H. (2002). Efficiency changes at major container ports in Japan: A window application of data envelopment analysis. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 14(2), 133–152.
10.1111/1467-940X.00052 Google Scholar
- Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(4), 1077–1082.
- Lee, T., Yeo, G. T., & Thai, V. V. (2014). Environmental efficiency analysis of port cities: Slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis approach. Transport Policy, 33, 82–88.
- Li, F., Zhu, Q., & Liang, L. (2018). Allocating a fixed cost based on a DEA-game cross efficiency approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 96, 196–207.
- Li, F., Zhu, Q., & Zhuang, J. (2018). Analysis of fire protection efficiency in the United States: A two-stage DEA-based approach. OR Spectrum, 40(1), 23–68.
- Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its Nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 56(5), 1278–1288.
- Liu, Q., & Lim, S. H. (2015). Toxic air pollution and container port efficiency in the USA. Maritime Economics & Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.29, 19, 94–105.
- Martinez-Budria, E., Diaz-Armas, R., Navarro-Ibanez, M., & Ravelo-Mesa, T. (1999). A study of the efficiency of Spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Transport Economics, 26(2), 237–253.
- Merk, O. (2012). Container ship emissions in world ports: A comparative overview. In Proceeding of IFSPA 2012 Hong Kong Conference. Hong: Kong.
- Natural Resources Defense Council., 2014. Prevention and control of shipping and port air emissions in China.
- Pille, P., & Paradi, J. (1997). Facets at the frontier and efficiency measurement in DEA. In Fifth European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis.
- Portela, M. C. A. S., Borges, P. C., & Thanassoulis, E. (2003). Finding closest targets in non-oriented DEA models: The case of convex and non-convex technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2–3), 251–269.
- Roll, Y., & Hayuth, Y. (1993). Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). Maritime Policy & Management, 20(2), 153–161.
10.1080/03088839300000025 Google Scholar
- Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 16–20.
- Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2005). A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 161(2), 579–581.
- Shephard, R.W. (1974). Indirect production functions. Mathematical Systems in Economics, No. 10. Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan.
- Song, M., An, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., & Wu, J. (2012). Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 4465–4469.
- Song, M., Zhang, G., Fang, K., & Zhang, J. (2016). Regional operational and environmental performance evaluation in China: Non-radial DEA methodology under natural and managerial disposability. Natural Hazards, 84(1), 243–265.
- Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2012). Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries. Energy Economics, 34(3), 686–699.
- Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.
- Tongzon, J. (2001). Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35(2), 107–122.
- Turner, H., Windle, R., & Dresner, M. (2004). North American container port productivity: 1984–1997. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 40(4), 339–356.
- Viton, P. A. (1997). Technical efficiency in multi-mode bus transit: A production frontier analysis. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 31(1), 23–39.
- Wang, H., Huo, D., & Ortiz, J. (2015). Assessing energy efficiency of port operations in china—A case study on sustainable development of green ports. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3(05), 28–33.
- Wang, K., Lu, B., & Wei, Y. M. (2013). China's regional energy and environmental efficiency: A range-adjusted measure based analysis. Applied Energy, 112, 1403–1415.
- Wu, J., & Liang, L. (2009). Performances and benchmarks of container ports using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1(3), 295–310.
- Wu, J., Liang, L., & Yang, F. (2009). Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 722–730.
- Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., Liu, H., & Liang, L. (2016). Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in China based on a parallel DEA approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48, 460–472.
- Yan, J., Sun, X., & Liu, J. J. (2009). Assessing container operator efficiency with heterogeneous and time-varying production frontiers. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 43(1), 172–185.
- Zhang, C., Zhou, K., Yang, S., & Shao, Z. (2017). On electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 353–368.
- Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Wang, H. (2012). Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(3), 625–635.
- Zhu, Q., Wu, J., Ji, X., & Li, F. (2018). A simple MILP to determine closest targets in non-oriented DEA model satisfying strong monotonicity. Omega, 79, 1–8.
- Zhu, Q., Wu, J., & Song, M. (2018). Efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis in the big data context. Computers & Operations Research, 98, 291–300.
