Volume 55, Issue 12 pp. 1892-1901
Critical Review and Invited Commentary

Epilepsy surgery in patients with bilateral temporal lobe seizures: A systematic review

Yahya Aghakhani

Corresponding Author

Yahya Aghakhani

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Address correspondence to Yahya Agha-Khani, Clinical Neuroscience Department, University of Calgary, 4448 Front St SE, Calgary, Alberta T3M 1M4, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Xiaorong Liu

Xiaorong Liu

Institute of Neuroscience and the Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Nathalie Jette

Nathalie Jette

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Department of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Samuel Wiebe

Samuel Wiebe

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Department of Community Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 November 2014
Citations: 60

Summary

We explored the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion, degree of seizure laterality on intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), and seizure outcome in patients with ambiguous or presumed bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (BiTLE) on scalp EEG. We systematically reviewed the literature using Embase and MEDLINE up to May 31, 2012. Patients with bilateral iEEG, temporal lobe surgery, and follow-up ≥1 year were included. We undertook three separate analyses on patients whose scalp EEG showed ambiguous onset or BiTLE (1) group data of those whose iEEG demonstrated unilateral TLE, (2) group data of those whose iEEG demonstrated BiTLE, (3) individual patient analysis in those with BiTLE for whom iEEG seizure laterality data were provided. Of 1,403 patients with ambiguous or presumed BiTLE on scalp EEG, 1,027 (73%) proved to have unilateral TLE on iEEG and contributed to the first analysis. Of these, 58% had Engel class I and 9% Engel class II outcomes. Of 132 patients in the second analysis (true BiTLE), Engel class I and II outcomes were achieved in 23% and 14%, respectively. Of 41 patients in the third analysis, 66% and 2% had Engel class I and II outcomes, respectively. The median proportion of seizures ipsilateral to the resection on iEEG did not differ between BiTLE patients with Engel class I–II (76%) and Engel III–IV (78%) outcomes (p = 0.87). Patients with ambiguous or independent bitemporal seizure onset on scalp EEG achieved good surgical outcomes. Overall, a significantly higher proportion of patients achieved good outcomes when iEEG showed unilateral TLE (67%) than when it showed true BiTLE (45%). However, the degree of seizure lateralization in those with BiTLE was not associated with seizure outcome, and it has a limited role in selecting the side of surgery.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me