Volume 28, Issue 2 pp. 540-547
Original Article

B-type natriuretic peptide over N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide to predict incident atrial fibrillation after cryptogenic stroke

E. Palà

E. Palà

Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

E Palà and J. Pagola contributed equally to this work.

Contribution: Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (lead), ​Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (lead), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
J. Pagola

J. Pagola

Stroke Unit, Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebrón Hospital and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

E Palà and J. Pagola contributed equally to this work.

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Funding acquisition (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
J. Juega

J. Juega

Stroke Unit, Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebrón Hospital and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
J. Francisco-Pascual

J. Francisco-Pascual

Arrhythmia Unit—Cardiology Department, Vall d'Hebrón Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

Contribution: Data curation (equal), ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
A. Bustamante

A. Bustamante

Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Supervision (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
A. Penalba

A. Penalba

Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Supervision (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
I. Comas

I. Comas

Clinical Biochemestry Service, Clinical Laboratories, Vall d'Hebrón Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
M. Rodriguez

M. Rodriguez

Stroke Unit, Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebrón Hospital and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
M. De Lera Alfonso

M. De Lera Alfonso

Stroke Unit, University Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
J. F. Arenillas

J. F. Arenillas

Stroke Unit, University Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
R. de Torres

R. de Torres

Stroke Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
S. Pérez-Sánchez

S. Pérez-Sánchez

Stroke Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
J. A. Cabezas

J. A. Cabezas

Stroke Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (supporting)

Search for more papers by this author
F. Moniche

F. Moniche

Stroke Unit, University Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
T. González-Alujas

T. González-Alujas

Echocardiography Lab Cardiology Department, Vall d'Hebrón Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

Contribution: ​Investigation (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
C. A. Molina

C. A. Molina

Stroke Unit, Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebrón Hospital and Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Funding acquisition (equal), Resources (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
J. Montaner

Corresponding Author

J. Montaner

Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence: J. Montaner, Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Pg. Vall d'Hebron 119–129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain (tel.: +34 93 489 4029; fax: 34-93-489-4015; e-mail: [email protected]).

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Funding acquisition (equal), Methodology (equal), Resources (equal), Supervision (lead), Writing - review & editing (equal)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 October 2020
Citations: 26

Abstract

Background and purpose

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are well-known surrogates of atrial fibrillation (AF) detection but studies usually present data on either BNP or NT-proBNP. The aim was to determine and directly compare the validity of the two biomarkers as a tool to predict AF and guide prolonged cardiac monitoring in cryptogenic stroke patients.

Methods

Non-lacunar acute ischaemic stroke (<72 h) patients over 55 years of age with cryptogenic stroke after standard evaluation were included in the Crypto-AF study and blood was collected. BNP and NT-proBNP levels were determined by automated immunoassays. AF was assessed by 28 days’ monitoring. Highest (optimizing specificity) and lowest (optimizing sensitivity) quartiles were used as biomarker cut-offs to build predictive models adjusted by sex and age. The integrated discrimination improvement index (IDI) and DeLong test were used to compare the performance of the two biomarkers.

Results

From 320 patients evaluated, 218 were included in the analysis. AF was detected in 50 patients (22.9%). NT-proBNP (P < 0.001) and BNP (P < 0.001) levels were higher in subjects with AF and their levels correlated (r = 0.495, P < 0.001). BNP showed an increased area under the curve (0.720 vs. 0.669; P = 0.0218) and a better predictive capacity (IDI = 3.63%, 95% confidence interval 1.36%–5.91%) compared to NT-proBNP. BNP performed better than NT-proBNP in a specific model (IDI = 3.7%, 95% confidence interval 0.87%–6.5%), whilst both biomarkers performed similarly in the case of a sensitive model.

Conclusions

Both BNP and NT-proBNP were increased in cryptogenic stroke patients with AF detection. Interestingly, BNP outperforms NT-proBNP, especially in terms of specificity.

Disclosure of conflicts of interest

The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.