Volume 13, Issue 4 pp. 859-866
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Job- and schoolprescription: A local adaptation to individual placement and support for first episode psychosis

Wenche ten Velden Hegelstad

Corresponding Author

Wenche ten Velden Hegelstad

TIPS, Network for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Psychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Correspondence

Wenche ten Velden Hegelstad, TIPS, Network for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Psychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, P.O. 8100, 4068 Stavanger, Norway.

Email: [email protected]; [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Inge Joa

Inge Joa

TIPS, Network for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Psychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Network for medical sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Lena Heitmann

Lena Heitmann

Job- and SchoolPrescription, Psychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Jan Olav Johannessen

Jan Olav Johannessen

TIPS, Network for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Psychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Network for medical sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Johannes Langeveld

Johannes Langeveld

TIPS, Network for Clinical Research in Psychosis, Psychiatric Division, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 June 2018
Citations: 10
Funding information The Norwegian Employment and Welfare Directorate

Abstract

Aim

Individual placement and support (IPS) for first episode psychosis (FEP) has proven effective for employment and education, but yields differing results across geographical regions. Local adaptations may be necessary for various reasons, such as regional differences in employment- and welfare services; in educational opportunities and job markets. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an adapted Norwegian intervention offering early IPS for education and employment to persons with FEP.

Method

Matched control (N = 66) study with a 1-year early IPS intervention and a 2-year follow up. A rating of fidelity to the IPS model was conducted.

Results

Fidelity was “good.” Adaptations to the model included the use of internships and flexible combinations of education and employment. Thirty out of 33 participants completed the intervention. Fourteen were in competitive employment >20 h/wk post intervention, compared to 2 in the control group. Fifteen participants were enrolled in education >20 h/wk, 10 of whom also had employment >20 h/wk and 3 < 20 h/wk, compared to 5 in the control group, with 2 having employment <20 h/wk on the side. Symptom levels did not predict outcome.

Conclusion

The School- and JobPrescription adaptation of IPS, allowing for temporary internships as a step towards obtaining the goal of paid competitive employment and facilitating flexible combinations of employment and education, showed encouraging results. These were however not sustained after closure of the intervention. At the 2-year follow up, Job- and SchoolPrescription advantages had waned, underscoring the point in IPS that support should be time-unlimited.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.